RulE: Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Rule Embedding

Read original: arXiv:2210.14905 - Published 5/21/2024 by Xiaojuan Tang, Song-Chun Zhu, Yitao Liang, Muhan Zhang

🌿

Overview

The paper introduces a novel framework called RulE (Rule Embedding) for knowledge graph (KG) reasoning.
RulE jointly represents entities, relations, and logical rules in a unified embedding space.
The learned rule embeddings allow for soft logical rule inference, addressing the brittleness of traditional logic-based approaches.
RulE also injects prior rule information into the entity and relation embeddings, improving the performance of knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods.

Plain English Explanation

Knowledge graphs are structured databases that store information in the form of interconnected entities and relationships. Reasoning over these knowledge graphs is an important task, as it allows us to uncover new insights and inferences.

The RulE framework proposed in this paper aims to enhance knowledge graph reasoning by leveraging logical rules. Imagine you have a set of rules, like "If someone is a parent, they are also a relative." RulE can learn representations (or embeddings) of these rules and use them to make more informed inferences about the knowledge graph.

Unlike traditional knowledge graph embedding methods, which only focus on representing entities and relations, RulE jointly learns embeddings for entities, relations, and logical rules. This allows the framework to understand the relationships between these different elements and make more nuanced and flexible inferences.

For example, if a rule like "If someone is a parent, they are also a relative" is partially true in the knowledge graph, RulE can assign a confidence score to this rule. This means it can still use the rule to make inferences, but with a degree of uncertainty, rather than treating it as a rigid, all-or-nothing proposition.

Additionally, by incorporating the logical rule information into the entity and relation embeddings, RulE can improve the performance of knowledge graph embedding methods, which are often used for tasks like link prediction and knowledge graph completion.

Technical Explanation

The RulE framework consists of two key components:

Rule Embedding: RulE learns embeddings for logical rules by jointly representing entities, relations, and rules in a unified embedding space. This allows the framework to capture the interactions between these different elements and perform soft logical rule inference.
Embedding Enrichment: The learned rule embeddings are used to enrich the entity and relation embeddings, injecting prior logical rule information into the knowledge graph representation. This helps improve the performance of standalone knowledge graph embedding methods.

The authors conduct extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks to evaluate the effectiveness of RulE. The results show that RulE outperforms many existing embedding-based and rule-based approaches for knowledge graph reasoning tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling and principled framework for leveraging logical rules to enhance knowledge graph reasoning. The key strength of RulE is its ability to perform soft logical rule inference, which addresses the brittleness of traditional logic-based approaches.

However, the paper does not delve into the limitations or potential challenges of the RulE framework. For example, the effectiveness of RulE may depend on the quality and coverage of the logical rules available, and the framework's performance may degrade in scenarios where the rules are incomplete or inconsistent.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the computational complexity and scalability of RulE, especially as the size and complexity of the knowledge graph and rule set increase. This information would be valuable for assessing the practical applicability of the framework in real-world scenarios.

Further research could also investigate the interpretability of the learned rule embeddings and how they can be leveraged to provide insights into the underlying structure and dynamics of the knowledge graph.

Conclusion

The RulE framework proposed in this paper represents a novel and promising approach to enhancing knowledge graph reasoning. By jointly learning embeddings for entities, relations, and logical rules, RulE can perform soft logical inference and improve the performance of standalone knowledge graph embedding methods.

The framework's ability to address the limitations of traditional logic-based approaches makes it a valuable contribution to the field of knowledge graph reasoning. While the paper does not explore all the potential limitations and challenges of RulE, it lays the groundwork for further research and development in this area, which could have significant implications for a wide range of applications that rely on knowledge graphs.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌿

RulE: Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Rule Embedding

Xiaojuan Tang, Song-Chun Zhu, Yitao Liang, Muhan Zhang

Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is an important problem for knowledge graphs. In this paper, we propose a novel and principled framework called textbf{RulE} (stands for {Rul}e {E}mbedding) to effectively leverage logical rules to enhance KG reasoning. Unlike knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods, RulE learns rule embeddings from existing triplets and first-order {rules} by jointly representing textbf{entities}, textbf{relations} and textbf{logical rules} in a unified embedding space. Based on the learned rule embeddings, a confidence score can be calculated for each rule, reflecting its consistency with the observed triplets. This allows us to perform logical rule inference in a soft way, thus alleviating the brittleness of logic. On the other hand, RulE injects prior logical rule information into the embedding space, enriching and regularizing the entity/relation embeddings. This makes KGE alone perform better too. RulE is conceptually simple and empirically effective. We conduct extensive experiments to verify each component of RulE. Results on multiple benchmarks reveal that our model outperforms the majority of existing embedding-based and rule-based approaches.

5/21/2024

Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning for Knowledge Graph Reasoning

Fengsong Sun, Jinyu Wang, Zhiqing Wei, Xianchao Zhang

Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is a task that aims to predict unknown facts based on known factual samples. Reasoning methods can be divided into two categories: rule-based methods and KG-embedding based methods. The former possesses precise reasoning capabilities but finds it challenging to reason efficiently over large-scale knowledge graphs. While gaining the ability to reason over large-scale knowledge graphs, the latter sacrifices reasoning accuracy. This paper aims to design a reasoning framework called Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning(NPLL) that achieves accurate reasoning on knowledge graphs. Our approach introduces a scoring module that effectively enhances the expressive power of embedding networks, striking a balance between model simplicity and reasoning capabilities. We improve the interpretability of the model by incorporating a Markov Logic Network based on variational inference. We empirically evaluate our approach on several benchmark datasets, and the experimental results validate that our method substantially enhances the accuracy and quality of the reasoning results.

7/8/2024

Improving rule mining via embedding-based link prediction

N'Dah Jean Kouagou, Arif Yilmaz, Michel Dumontier, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

Rule mining on knowledge graphs allows for explainable link prediction. Contrarily, embedding-based methods for link prediction are well known for their generalization capabilities, but their predictions are not interpretable. Several approaches combining the two families have been proposed in recent years. The majority of the resulting hybrid approaches are usually trained within a unified learning framework, which often leads to convergence issues due to the complexity of the learning task. In this work, we propose a new way to combine the two families of approaches. Specifically, we enrich a given knowledge graph by means of its pre-trained entity and relation embeddings before applying rule mining systems on the enriched knowledge graph. To validate our approach, we conduct extensive experiments on seven benchmark datasets. An analysis of the results generated by our approach suggests that we discover new valuable rules on the enriched graphs. We provide an open source implementation of our approach as well as pretrained models and datasets at https://github.com/Jean-KOUAGOU/EnhancedRuleLearning

6/17/2024

Learning Rules from KGs Guided by Language Models

Zihang Peng, Daria Stepanova, Vinh Thinh Ho, Heike Adel, Alessandra Russo, Simon Ott

Advances in information extraction have enabled the automatic construction of large knowledge graphs (e.g., Yago, Wikidata or Google KG), which are widely used in many applications like semantic search or data analytics. However, due to their semi-automatic construction, KGs are often incomplete. Rule learning methods, concerned with the extraction of frequent patterns from KGs and casting them into rules, can be applied to predict potentially missing facts. A crucial step in this process is rule ranking. Ranking of rules is especially challenging over highly incomplete or biased KGs (e.g., KGs predominantly storing facts about famous people), as in this case biased rules might fit the data best and be ranked at the top based on standard statistical metrics like rule confidence. To address this issue, prior works proposed to rank rules not only relying on the original KG but also facts predicted by a KG embedding model. At the same time, with the recent rise of Language Models (LMs), several works have claimed that LMs can be used as alternative means for KG completion. In this work, our goal is to verify to which extent the exploitation of LMs is helpful for improving the quality of rule learning systems.

9/14/2024