Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle for Deep Learning

Read original: arXiv:2407.21347 - Published 8/1/2024 by David Zagardo
Total Score

0

Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle for Deep Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • A novel algorithm called "Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle" is proposed for training deep learning models with strong privacy guarantees.
  • The algorithm aims to improve the accuracy and utility of differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) by shuffling gradients in a differentially private manner.
  • The research explores the benefits of this approach compared to standard DP-SGD.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new technique called "Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle" to train deep learning models while protecting the privacy of the training data. Differential privacy is a widely used approach to ensure that the model does not leak sensitive information about individual data points.

The key idea is to split the gradients (the updates to the model during training) into smaller "blocks" and then randomly shuffle these blocks in a way that preserves the overall gradient update but makes it difficult to identify the contribution of any individual data point. This shuffling process adds noise to the gradients, providing stronger privacy guarantees compared to standard differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD).

The researchers show that this approach can improve the accuracy of the trained model while maintaining the same level of privacy. This is important because often, there is a tradeoff between the privacy guarantee and the model's performance. By shuffling the gradients, the authors are able to break this tradeoff and achieve better results.

Technical Explanation

The novel algorithm proposed in the paper works as follows:

  1. During the training process, the gradients are divided into smaller "blocks".
  2. These gradient blocks are then randomly shuffled before being added to the model update.
  3. The shuffling process is designed to be differentially private, meaning that it does not reveal too much information about any individual data point.

The key advantage of this approach is that it can improve the accuracy of the trained model compared to standard DP-SGD. The shuffling process introduces noise in a more structured way, which helps preserve the overall gradient signal while still providing strong privacy guarantees.

The paper presents theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations to demonstrate the benefits of this technique. The authors show that it outperforms DP-SGD on several benchmark datasets and deep learning tasks, including image classification and language modeling.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the proposed algorithm and its performance. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:

  1. The analysis is primarily focused on image classification and language modeling tasks. It would be interesting to see how the algorithm performs on a wider range of deep learning problems, such as reinforcement learning or graph neural networks.

  2. The paper does not discuss the computational overhead of the gradient shuffling process. In practice, this additional step may increase the training time, which could be a concern for large-scale or time-sensitive applications.

  3. The privacy analysis is based on the standard differential privacy framework, which assumes that the data is independent and identically distributed. It would be valuable to explore the algorithm's performance in more realistic scenarios with correlated or non-i.i.d. data.

  4. The paper does not provide a detailed comparison to other recent differentially private deep learning techniques, such as uncertainty-based approaches or gradient decomposition methods. A more comprehensive benchmarking against the state-of-the-art would help to better situate the contributions of this work.

Conclusion

The "Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle" algorithm presented in this paper offers a promising approach to train deep learning models with strong privacy guarantees. By shuffling gradients in a differentially private manner, the technique can improve model accuracy compared to standard DP-SGD, helping to bridge the gap between privacy and utility.

The novel ideas and theoretical insights explored in this work contribute to the ongoing efforts to develop more effective and practical differentially private deep learning methods. As the importance of privacy-preserving AI continues to grow, research like this will play a crucial role in enabling the widespread deployment of such techniques in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle for Deep Learning
Total Score

0

Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle for Deep Learning

David Zagardo

Traditional Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) introduces statistical noise on top of gradients drawn from a Gaussian distribution to ensure privacy. This paper introduces the novel Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle (DP-BloGS) algorithm for deep learning. BloGS builds off of existing private deep learning literature, but makes a definitive shift by taking a probabilistic approach to gradient noise introduction through shuffling modeled after information theoretic privacy analyses. The theoretical results presented in this paper show that the combination of shuffling, parameter-specific block size selection, batch layer clipping, and gradient accumulation allows DP-BloGS to achieve training times close to that of non-private training while maintaining similar privacy and utility guarantees to DP-SGD. DP-BloGS is found to be significantly more resistant to data extraction attempts than DP-SGD. The theoretical results are validated by the experimental findings.

Read more

8/1/2024

Weights Shuffling for Improving DPSGD in Transformer-based Models
Total Score

0

Weights Shuffling for Improving DPSGD in Transformer-based Models

Jungang Yang, Zhe Ji, Liyao Xiang

Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms, especially in high-dimensional settings, often face the challenge of maintaining privacy without compromising the data utility. This work introduces an innovative shuffling mechanism in Differentially-Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) to enhance the utility of large models at the same privacy guarantee of the unshuffled case. Specifically, we reveal that random shuffling brings additional randomness to the trajectory of gradient descent while not impacting the model accuracy by the permutation invariance property -- the model can be equivalently computed in both forward and backward propagations under permutation. We show that permutation indeed improves the privacy guarantee of DPSGD in theory, but tracking the exact privacy loss on shuffled model is particularly challenging. Hence we exploit the approximation on sum of lognormal distributions to derive the condition for the shuffled DPSGD to meet the DP guarantee. Auditing results show that our condition offers a DP guarantee quite close to the audited privacy level, demonstrating our approach an effective estimation in practice. Experimental results have verified our theoretical derivation and illustrate that our mechanism improves the accuracy of DPSGD over the state-of-the-art baselines on a variety of models and tasks.

Read more

7/23/2024

How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?
Total Score

0

How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?

Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang

We demonstrate a substantial gap between the privacy guarantees of the Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism under different types of batch sampling: (i) Shuffling, and (ii) Poisson subsampling; the typical analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) follows by interpreting it as a post-processing of ABLQ. While shuffling-based DP-SGD is more commonly used in practical implementations, it has not been amenable to easy privacy analysis, either analytically or even numerically. On the other hand, Poisson subsampling-based DP-SGD is challenging to scalably implement, but has a well-understood privacy analysis, with multiple open-source numerically tight privacy accountants available. This has led to a common practice of using shuffling-based DP-SGD in practice, but using the privacy analysis for the corresponding Poisson subsampling version. Our result shows that there can be a substantial gap between the privacy analysis when using the two types of batch sampling, and thus advises caution in reporting privacy parameters for DP-SGD.

Read more

6/7/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Uncertainty quantification by block bootstrap for differentially private stochastic gradient descent

Holger Dette, Carina Graw

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is a widely used tool in machine learning. In the context of Differential Privacy (DP), SGD has been well studied in the last years in which the focus is mainly on convergence rates and privacy guarantees. While in the non private case, uncertainty quantification (UQ) for SGD by bootstrap has been addressed by several authors, these procedures cannot be transferred to differential privacy due to multiple queries to the private data. In this paper, we propose a novel block bootstrap for SGD under local differential privacy that is computationally tractable and does not require an adjustment of the privacy budget. The method can be easily implemented and is applicable to a broad class of estimation problems. We prove the validity of our approach and illustrate its finite sample properties by means of a simulation study. As a by-product, the new method also provides a simple alternative numerical tool for UQ for non-private SGD.

Read more

5/22/2024