Weights Shuffling for Improving DPSGD in Transformer-based Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a technique called "Weights Shuffling" to improve the performance of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) in Transformer-based models.
- DPSGD is a privacy-preserving training method, but it can degrade model performance. Weights Shuffling aims to mitigate this issue.
- The paper presents experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of Weights Shuffling in improving DPSGD on various Transformer-based tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Developing machine learning models while protecting the privacy of the data used for training is an important challenge. One approach is to use a technique called Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD), which adds noise to the model updates to prevent the leakage of sensitive information. However, DPSGD can sometimes reduce the accuracy of the trained model.
The researchers in this paper propose a new technique called "Weights Shuffling" to address this issue. The key idea is to randomly shuffle the weights of the model during the training process. This shuffling helps the model learn useful patterns in the data despite the added noise from DPSGD.
The paper demonstrates that Weights Shuffling can significantly improve the performance of DPSGD on various Transformer-based tasks, such as language modeling and text classification. The technique is relatively simple to implement and can be easily integrated into existing DPSGD training pipelines.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the use of "Weights Shuffling" to improve the performance of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) in Transformer-based models. DPSGD is a privacy-preserving training method that adds noise to the model updates to prevent the leakage of sensitive information from the training data. However, this noise can degrade the model's performance.
The key idea behind Weights Shuffling is to randomly shuffle the weights of the model during the training process. This shuffling helps the model learn useful patterns in the data despite the added noise from DPSGD. The researchers hypothesize that Weights Shuffling can improve the model's ability to generalize and capture the underlying structure of the data, even with the privacy-preserving constraints.
The paper presents experiments on various Transformer-based tasks, including language modeling and text classification. The results show that Weights Shuffling can significantly improve the performance of DPSGD compared to standard DPSGD training. The technique is shown to be effective across different privacy budgets and model architectures.
The paper also provides insights into the mechanisms behind the success of Weights Shuffling, suggesting that it helps the model explore a wider range of parameter configurations and mitigates the negative effects of the added noise. Additionally, the authors discuss the potential limitations of the technique and areas for further research.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the performance of DPSGD in Transformer-based models. The Weights Shuffling technique is relatively straightforward to implement and can be easily integrated into existing DPSGD training pipelines.
However, the paper could have delved deeper into the potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, it would be interesting to understand how Weights Shuffling performs on larger, more complex Transformer models or in the presence of more challenging privacy constraints. Additionally, the paper could have discussed the computational overhead and training time impact of the Weights Shuffling technique.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of differentially private machine learning and provides a promising direction for improving the performance of DPSGD in Transformer-based models.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel technique called "Weights Shuffling" that can significantly improve the performance of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) in Transformer-based models. By randomly shuffling the weights of the model during training, Weights Shuffling helps the model learn useful patterns in the data despite the added noise from DPSGD.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of Weights Shuffling across various tasks and privacy budgets, making it a promising approach for developing privacy-preserving Transformer-based models. The technique is relatively simple to implement and can be easily integrated into existing DPSGD training pipelines.
While the paper provides a thorough analysis of the mechanisms behind the success of Weights Shuffling, further research is needed to explore its limitations and potential extensions. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the field of differentially private machine learning and could have significant implications for the development of secure and accurate Transformer-based models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Weights Shuffling for Improving DPSGD in Transformer-based Models
Jungang Yang, Zhe Ji, Liyao Xiang
Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms, especially in high-dimensional settings, often face the challenge of maintaining privacy without compromising the data utility. This work introduces an innovative shuffling mechanism in Differentially-Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DPSGD) to enhance the utility of large models at the same privacy guarantee of the unshuffled case. Specifically, we reveal that random shuffling brings additional randomness to the trajectory of gradient descent while not impacting the model accuracy by the permutation invariance property -- the model can be equivalently computed in both forward and backward propagations under permutation. We show that permutation indeed improves the privacy guarantee of DPSGD in theory, but tracking the exact privacy loss on shuffled model is particularly challenging. Hence we exploit the approximation on sum of lognormal distributions to derive the condition for the shuffled DPSGD to meet the DP guarantee. Auditing results show that our condition offers a DP guarantee quite close to the audited privacy level, demonstrating our approach an effective estimation in practice. Experimental results have verified our theoretical derivation and illustrate that our mechanism improves the accuracy of DPSGD over the state-of-the-art baselines on a variety of models and tasks.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Beyond Statistical Estimation: Differentially Private Individual Computation in the Shuffle Model
Shaowei Wang, Changyu Dong, Xiangfu Song, Jin Li, Zhili Zhou, Di Wang, Han Wu
In data-driven applications, preserving user privacy while enabling valuable computations remains a critical challenge. Technologies like Differential Privacy (DP) have been pivotal in addressing these concerns. The shuffle model of DP requires no trusted curators and can achieve high utility by leveraging the privacy amplification effect yielded from shuffling. These benefits have led to significant interest in the shuffle model. However, the computation tasks in the shuffle model are limited to statistical estimation, making the shuffle model inapplicable to real-world scenarios in which each user requires a personalized output. This paper introduces a novel paradigm termed Private Individual Computation (PIC), expanding the shuffle model to support a broader range of permutation-equivariant computations. PIC enables personalized outputs while preserving privacy, and enjoys privacy amplification through shuffling. We propose a concrete protocol that realizes PIC. By using one-time public keys, our protocol enables users to receive their outputs without compromising anonymity, which is essential for privacy amplification. Additionally, we present an optimal randomizer, the Minkowski Response, designed for the PIC model to enhance utility. We formally prove the security and privacy properties of the PIC protocol. Theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations demonstrate PIC's capability in handling non-statistical computation tasks, and the efficacy of PIC and the Minkowski randomizer in achieving superior utility compared to existing solutions.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle for Deep Learning
David Zagardo
Traditional Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) introduces statistical noise on top of gradients drawn from a Gaussian distribution to ensure privacy. This paper introduces the novel Differentially Private Block-wise Gradient Shuffle (DP-BloGS) algorithm for deep learning. BloGS builds off of existing private deep learning literature, but makes a definitive shift by taking a probabilistic approach to gradient noise introduction through shuffling modeled after information theoretic privacy analyses. The theoretical results presented in this paper show that the combination of shuffling, parameter-specific block size selection, batch layer clipping, and gradient accumulation allows DP-BloGS to achieve training times close to that of non-private training while maintaining similar privacy and utility guarantees to DP-SGD. DP-BloGS is found to be significantly more resistant to data extraction attempts than DP-SGD. The theoretical results are validated by the experimental findings.
Read more8/1/2024
0
How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?
Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang
We demonstrate a substantial gap between the privacy guarantees of the Adaptive Batch Linear Queries (ABLQ) mechanism under different types of batch sampling: (i) Shuffling, and (ii) Poisson subsampling; the typical analysis of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) follows by interpreting it as a post-processing of ABLQ. While shuffling-based DP-SGD is more commonly used in practical implementations, it has not been amenable to easy privacy analysis, either analytically or even numerically. On the other hand, Poisson subsampling-based DP-SGD is challenging to scalably implement, but has a well-understood privacy analysis, with multiple open-source numerically tight privacy accountants available. This has led to a common practice of using shuffling-based DP-SGD in practice, but using the privacy analysis for the corresponding Poisson subsampling version. Our result shows that there can be a substantial gap between the privacy analysis when using the two types of batch sampling, and thus advises caution in reporting privacy parameters for DP-SGD.
Read more6/7/2024