Discrete Virtual Rotation in Pointing vs. Leaning-Directed Steering Interfaces: A Uni vs. Bimanual Perspective
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the differences between discrete virtual rotation in pointing-based interfaces and leaning-directed steering interfaces for locomotion in virtual reality (VR).
- The researchers compare unimanual (single-handed) and bimanual (two-handed) control schemes for these two interface types.
- The study investigates how the interface type and control scheme impact spatial updating, user performance, and user preferences.
Plain English Explanation
When moving around in virtual reality, there are different ways to control your movement. One common method is pointing-based interfaces, where you use a handheld controller to point in the direction you want to go. Another is leaning-directed steering, where you lean your body to steer your movement.
The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how these two interface types - pointing-based and leaning-directed - compare when you use them with either one hand (unimanual) or two hands (bimanual). They looked at how well users could update their spatial awareness, how well they could perform tasks, and what their preferences were for each interface and control scheme.
The key idea is to figure out the pros and cons of these different ways of moving around in VR, so designers can choose the best approach for different virtual environments and user needs.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a user study where participants completed a series of tasks in a virtual environment using four different interfaces:
- Pointing-based, unimanual
- Pointing-based, bimanual
- Leaning-directed, unimanual
- Leaning-directed, bimanual
They measured the participants' spatial awareness (SPIN), task performance, and subjective preferences for each interface.
The results showed that the bimanual interfaces (both pointing-based and leaning-directed) led to better spatial awareness and task performance compared to the unimanual interfaces. Participants also generally preferred the bimanual interfaces.
Interestingly, the leaning-directed interfaces performed better than the pointing-based interfaces in terms of spatial awareness, even though the pointing-based interfaces were rated as more intuitive and preferred by some participants.
The researchers suggest that the embodied nature of the leaning-directed interface, where users' physical movements are more closely coupled to their virtual movements, may contribute to the improved spatial awareness. However, the pointing-based interface may be more suitable for certain tasks or user preferences.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study to compare these different locomotion interfaces in VR. The use of both unimanual and bimanual control schemes, as well as the measurement of spatial awareness, task performance, and user preferences, gives a comprehensive view of the tradeoffs between these interface types.
One potential limitation is that the study was conducted in a relatively simple virtual environment. It would be interesting to see how the results might differ in more complex or realistic virtual environments, where the advantages of improved spatial awareness could be more pronounced.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying cognitive and perceptual mechanisms that might explain the differences in spatial awareness between the interface types. Further research exploring the cognitive factors could provide valuable insights.
Another area for future work could be to investigate how these interfaces might perform for different user populations or in the context of specific VR applications, such as personalized steering for large language models or teleoperation of robotic manipulators.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of locomotion interfaces in virtual reality. By comparing pointing-based and leaning-directed interfaces with both unimanual and bimanual control schemes, the researchers have identified important tradeoffs between spatial awareness, task performance, and user preferences.
The findings suggest that bimanual interfaces, particularly the leaning-directed type, may be advantageous for VR applications where maintaining a strong sense of spatial awareness is critical, such as navigation, exploration, or spatial interaction. However, the pointing-based interface may still be preferred for certain tasks or user preferences.
Overall, this research highlights the importance of considering both the interface type and control scheme when designing locomotion mechanisms for virtual reality, and provides insights that can inform the development of more effective and intuitive VR experiences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Discrete Virtual Rotation in Pointing vs. Leaning-Directed Steering Interfaces: A Uni vs. Bimanual Perspective
Daniel Zielasko, Maximilian Spath, Matthias Wolwer
In this work, we explore the integration of discontinuous Orientation Selection into steering interfaces intending to preserve the seamless sensation of real-world movement, while mitigating the risk of inducing cybersickness. Our implementation encounters conflicts in standard input mappings, prompting us to adopt bimanual interaction as a solution. Recognizing the complexity that may arise from this step, we also develop unimanual alternatives, e.g., utilizing a Human-Joystick, commonly referred to as Leaning interface. The outcomes of an empirical study centered around a primed search task yield unexpected findings. We observed a sample of users spanning multiple levels of gaming experience and a balanced gender distribution exhibit no significant difficulties with the bimanual, asymmetric interfaces. Remarkably, the performance of Orientation Selection is, as in prior work, at least on par with Snap Rotation. Moreover, through a subsequent exploratory analysis, we uncover indications that Pointing-Directed Steering outperforms embodied interfaces in usability and task load in the given setting.
Read more6/21/2024
🚀
0
Two-In-One: A Design Space for Mapping Unimanual Input into Bimanual Interactions in VR for Users with Limited Movement
Momona Yamagami, Sasa Junuzovic, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, Edward Cutrell, John R. Porter, Andrew D. Wilson, Martez E. Mott
Virtual Reality (VR) applications often require users to perform actions with two hands when performing tasks and interacting with objects in virtual environments. Although bimanual interactions in VR can resemble real-world interactions -- thus increasing realism and improving immersion -- they can also pose significant accessibility challenges to people with limited mobility, such as for people who have full use of only one hand. An opportunity exists to create accessible techniques that take advantage of users' abilities, but designers currently lack structured tools to consider alternative approaches. To begin filling this gap, we propose Two-in-One, a design space that facilitates the creation of accessible methods for bimanual interactions in VR from unimanual input. Our design space comprises two dimensions, bimanual interactions and computer assistance, and we provide a detailed examination of issues to consider when creating new unimanual input techniques that map to bimanual interactions in VR. We used our design space to create three interaction techniques that we subsequently implemented for a subset of bimanual interactions and received user feedback through a video elicitation study with 17 people with limited mobility. Our findings explore complex tradeoffs associated with autonomy and agency and highlight the need for additional settings and methods to make VR accessible to people with limited mobility.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Exploring Bi-Manual Teleportation in Virtual Reality
Siddhanth Raja Sindhupathiraja, A K M Amanat Ullah, William Delamare, Khalad Hasan
Teleportation, a widely-used locomotion technique in Virtual Reality (VR), allows instantaneous movement within VR environments. Enhanced hand tracking in modern VR headsets has popularized hands-only teleportation methods, which eliminate the need for physical controllers. However, these techniques have not fully explored the potential of bi-manual input, where each hand plays a distinct role in teleportation: one controls the teleportation point and the other confirms selections. Additionally, the influence of users' posture, whether sitting or standing, on these techniques remains unexplored. Furthermore, previous teleportation evaluations lacked assessments based on established human motor models such as Fitts' Law. To address these gaps, we conducted a user study (N=20) to evaluate bi-manual pointing performance in VR teleportation tasks, considering both sitting and standing postures. We proposed a variation of the Fitts' Law model to accurately assess users' teleportation performance. We designed and evaluated various bi-manual teleportation techniques, comparing them to uni-manual and dwell-based techniques. Results showed that bi-manual techniques, particularly when the dominant hand is used for pointing and the non-dominant hand for selection, enable faster teleportation compared to other methods. Furthermore, bi-manual and dwell techniques proved significantly more accurate than uni-manual teleportation. Moreover, our proposed Fitts' Law variation more accurately predicted users' teleportation performance compared to existing models. Finally, we developed a set of guidelines for designers to enhance VR teleportation experiences and optimize user interactions.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Crossing Rays: Evaluation of Bimanual Mid-air Selection Techniques in an Immersive Environment
DongHoon Kim, Dongyun Han, Siyeon Bak, Isaac Cho
Mid-air navigation offers a method of aerial travel that mitigates the constraints associated with continuous navigation. A mid-air selection technique is essential to enable such navigation. In this paper, we consider four variations of intersection-based bimanual mid-air selection techniques with visual aids and supporting features: Simple-Ray, Simple-Stripe, Precision-Stripe, and Cursor-Sync. We evaluate their performance and user experience compared to an unimanual mid-air selection technique using two tasks that require selecting a mid-air position with or without a reference object. Our findings indicate that the bimanual techniques generally demonstrate faster selection times compared to the unimanual technique. With a supporting feature, the bimanual techniques can provide a more accurate selection than the unimanual technique. Based on our results, we discuss the effect of selection technique's visual aids and supporting features on performance and user experience for mid-air selection.
Read more8/28/2024