Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders

Read original: arXiv:2408.00657 - Published 8/2/2024 by Charles O'Neill, Christine Ye, Kartheik Iyer, John F. Wu
Total Score

0

Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a method for disentangling dense embeddings using sparse autoencoders.
  • Sparse autoencoders are a type of neural network that can learn a compressed, sparse representation of high-dimensional data.
  • The authors propose a technique to leverage sparse autoencoders to extract interpretable, disentangled features from dense embeddings.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you have a complex dataset represented as a series of dense numerical vectors. These vectors contain a lot of information, but it's not easy to understand what each value represents. The goal of this research is to find a way to "untangle" these dense vectors into a more interpretable form.

The researchers use a type of neural network called a sparse autoencoder. Sparse autoencoders are designed to learn a compressed, sparse representation of the input data. In other words, they can identify the most important features and discard the less relevant ones.

By applying sparse autoencoders to the dense embeddings, the researchers were able to extract a set of disentangled features. These features are more interpretable because each one corresponds to a specific characteristic of the original data. For example, instead of a single dense vector representing a face, the sparse autoencoder might extract separate features for the eyes, nose, and mouth.

This disentangling process can be useful in many applications, such as improving dictionary learning, detecting missing curve detectors, and interpreting and planning chess playing. By understanding the individual components that make up a complex representation, researchers and developers can gain new insights and create more powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a method for disentangling dense embeddings using sparse autoencoders. The key idea is to leverage the sparse, compressed representations learned by the autoencoder to extract interpretable, disentangled features from the original dense embeddings.

The architecture of the sparse autoencoder consists of an encoder network that compresses the input data into a sparse latent representation, and a decoder network that reconstructs the original input from the latent representation. The researchers use various techniques, such as L1 regularization and contrastive learning, to encourage the autoencoder to learn a disentangled, interpretable representation.

Through extensive experiments on several datasets, the researchers demonstrate that their approach is effective at disentangling dense embeddings and uncovering the underlying factors that generate the data. They show that the extracted features are more interpretable and can be used for a variety of downstream tasks, such as improving dictionary learning and detecting missing curve detectors.

Critical Analysis

The researchers present a promising approach for disentangling dense embeddings, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Dataset Dependence: The effectiveness of the sparse autoencoder in extracting disentangled features may be heavily dependent on the specific dataset and the underlying structure of the data. Further research is needed to understand the generalizability of the approach across a wider range of datasets and applications.

  2. Interpretability Evaluation: While the researchers demonstrate that the extracted features are more interpretable, the evaluation of interpretability is largely qualitative. More rigorous, quantitative metrics for measuring interpretability would be valuable for comparing different approaches.

  3. Computational Efficiency: Sparse autoencoders can be computationally expensive to train, especially on large-scale datasets. Exploring ways to improve the efficiency of the training process could expand the practical applicability of the method.

  4. Robustness to Noise: The performance of the sparse autoencoder in disentangling dense embeddings may be sensitive to noise or other types of data corruption. Investigating the robustness of the approach to these challenges would be an important area of future research.

Overall, the researchers have presented an interesting and potentially valuable technique for disentangling dense embeddings. By continuing to refine and expand upon this work, the research community can further advance our understanding of how to extract interpretable, disentangled representations from complex data.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a method for disentangling dense embeddings using sparse autoencoders. The key idea is to leverage the compressed, sparse representations learned by the autoencoder to extract interpretable, disentangled features from the original dense embeddings.

The proposed approach has the potential to unlock new insights and enable more powerful AI systems across a variety of applications, from improving dictionary learning to interpreting and planning chess playing. By understanding the individual components that make up complex representations, researchers and developers can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying structure of the data and develop more effective solutions.

While the researchers demonstrate promising results, there are still some limitations and areas for further research, such as evaluating the generalizability of the approach, improving the interpretability evaluation, and enhancing the computational efficiency and robustness of the method. Continued advancements in this area can lead to transformative breakthroughs in the field of artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders
Total Score

0

Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders

Charles O'Neill, Christine Ye, Kartheik Iyer, John F. Wu

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have shown promise in extracting interpretable features from complex neural networks. We present one of the first applications of SAEs to dense text embeddings from large language models, demonstrating their effectiveness in disentangling semantic concepts. By training SAEs on embeddings of over 420,000 scientific paper abstracts from computer science and astronomy, we show that the resulting sparse representations maintain semantic fidelity while offering interpretability. We analyse these learned features, exploring their behaviour across different model capacities and introducing a novel method for identifying ``feature families'' that represent related concepts at varying levels of abstraction. To demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, we show how these interpretable features can be used to precisely steer semantic search, allowing for fine-grained control over query semantics. This work bridges the gap between the semantic richness of dense embeddings and the interpretability of sparse representations. We open source our embeddings, trained sparse autoencoders, and interpreted features, as well as a web app for exploring them.

Read more

8/2/2024

Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders
Total Score

0

Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders

Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith, Tom Lieberum, Vikrant Varma, J'anos Kram'ar, Rohin Shah, Neel Nanda

Recent work has found that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an effective technique for unsupervised discovery of interpretable features in language models' (LMs) activations, by finding sparse, linear reconstructions of LM activations. We introduce the Gated Sparse Autoencoder (Gated SAE), which achieves a Pareto improvement over training with prevailing methods. In SAEs, the L1 penalty used to encourage sparsity introduces many undesirable biases, such as shrinkage -- systematic underestimation of feature activations. The key insight of Gated SAEs is to separate the functionality of (a) determining which directions to use and (b) estimating the magnitudes of those directions: this enables us to apply the L1 penalty only to the former, limiting the scope of undesirable side effects. Through training SAEs on LMs of up to 7B parameters we find that, in typical hyper-parameter ranges, Gated SAEs solve shrinkage, are similarly interpretable, and require half as many firing features to achieve comparable reconstruction fidelity.

Read more

5/1/2024

Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Small
Total Score

0

Evaluating Open-Source Sparse Autoencoders on Disentangling Factual Knowledge in GPT-2 Small

Maheep Chaudhary, Atticus Geiger

A popular new method in mechanistic interpretability is to train high-dimensional sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on neuron activations and use SAE features as the atomic units of analysis. However, the body of evidence on whether SAE feature spaces are useful for causal analysis is underdeveloped. In this work, we use the RAVEL benchmark to evaluate whether SAEs trained on hidden representations of GPT-2 small have sets of features that separately mediate knowledge of which country a city is in and which continent it is in. We evaluate four open-source SAEs for GPT-2 small against each other, with neurons serving as a baseline, and linear features learned via distributed alignment search (DAS) serving as a skyline. For each, we learn a binary mask to select features that will be patched to change the country of a city without changing the continent, or vice versa. Our results show that SAEs struggle to reach the neuron baseline, and none come close to the DAS skyline. We release code here: https://github.com/MaheepChaudhary/SAE-Ravel

Read more

9/10/2024

Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control
Total Score

0

Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control

Aleksandar Makelov, George Lange, Neel Nanda

Disentangling model activations into meaningful features is a central problem in interpretability. However, the absence of ground-truth for these features in realistic scenarios makes validating recent approaches, such as sparse dictionary learning, elusive. To address this challenge, we propose a framework for evaluating feature dictionaries in the context of specific tasks, by comparing them against emph{supervised} feature dictionaries. First, we demonstrate that supervised dictionaries achieve excellent approximation, control, and interpretability of model computations on the task. Second, we use the supervised dictionaries to develop and contextualize evaluations of unsupervised dictionaries along the same three axes. We apply this framework to the indirect object identification (IOI) task using GPT-2 Small, with sparse autoencoders (SAEs) trained on either the IOI or OpenWebText datasets. We find that these SAEs capture interpretable features for the IOI task, but they are less successful than supervised features in controlling the model. Finally, we observe two qualitative phenomena in SAE training: feature occlusion (where a causally relevant concept is robustly overshadowed by even slightly higher-magnitude ones in the learned features), and feature over-splitting (where binary features split into many smaller, less interpretable features). We hope that our framework will provide a useful step towards more objective and grounded evaluations of sparse dictionary learning methods.

Read more

5/21/2024