Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper investigates the performance of VideoQA Transformer models, which are used to answer questions about video content.
- The authors find that these models do not truly understand the joint multimodal (visual and textual) information, but rather rely on biases and shortcuts.
- They propose a new evaluation protocol to reveal the limitations of existing VideoQA models and provide insights for developing more robust models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a type of AI model called a VideoQA Transformer, which is used to answer questions about the content of videos. These models are trained on large datasets of video clips and their associated questions and answers.
While VideoQA Transformer models perform well on standard benchmarks, the authors of this paper discovered that these models are not truly understanding the joint visual and textual information in the videos. Instead, they are relying on certain biases and shortcuts to come up with the answers, without genuinely comprehending the connection between what they see and what they read.
To reveal this limitation, the researchers proposed a new way of evaluating these models. By designing more challenging test cases that expose the models' weaknesses, they were able to show that current VideoQA Transformers are not as capable of joint multimodal understanding as they might appear. This provides important insights for developing better, more robust VideoQA models in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on VideoQA Transformer models, which are a type of AI system designed to answer questions about the content of videos. These models take in both the visual information from the video and the textual question, and are expected to provide an answer that demonstrates an understanding of the joint multimodal information.
The authors conduct a thorough analysis of existing VideoQA Transformer models and find that they do not truly grasp the relationship between the visual and textual inputs. Instead, the models rely on various biases and shortcuts, such as focusing on salient visual objects or recognizing textual patterns, to generate answers without a deep comprehension of the multimodal content.
To expose these limitations, the researchers propose a new evaluation protocol that includes a variety of challenging test cases. These test cases are designed to isolate different aspects of multimodal understanding and reveal the shortcomings of current VideoQA models. For example, they create cases where the visual and textual information are intentionally misaligned, forcing the models to go beyond simple associations and truly integrate the different modalities.
Through this rigorous evaluation, the authors demonstrate that the performance of VideoQA Transformer models is largely an "illusion" of joint multimodal understanding. The models are able to perform well on standard benchmarks, but the new test cases show that they lack the depth of understanding required for more complex multimodal reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of multimodal AI by revealing the limitations of existing VideoQA Transformer models. The authors' proposed evaluation protocol is a significant step forward, as it moves beyond the standard benchmarks and exposes the models' reliance on biases and shortcuts.
However, one potential limitation of the study is the scope of the test cases. While the authors have designed a diverse set of challenging scenarios, there may be other types of multimodal reasoning that are not captured by the current evaluation. As the field of multimodal AI continues to evolve, it will be important to expand the breadth of testing to ensure a more comprehensive understanding of model capabilities.
Additionally, the paper does not provide detailed insights into the specific biases and heuristics that the VideoQA Transformer models are using to generate their answers. A deeper analysis of the models' internal decision-making processes could shed more light on the underlying issues and guide the development of more robust multimodal AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of VideoQA Transformer models by revealing their limited ability to truly integrate visual and textual information. By proposing a more comprehensive evaluation protocol, the authors have shown that the strong performance of these models on standard benchmarks is often an illusion, masking their reliance on biases and shortcuts.
The insights from this research will be valuable for researchers and developers working on advancing the field of multimodal AI. By addressing the limitations exposed in this paper, they can work towards building VideoQA models that demonstrate a deeper, more genuine understanding of the joint visual and textual information, paving the way for more robust and capable multimodal systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Dissecting Multimodality in VideoQA Transformer Models by Impairing Modality Fusion
Ishaan Singh Rawal, Alexander Matyasko, Shantanu Jaiswal, Basura Fernando, Cheston Tan
While VideoQA Transformer models demonstrate competitive performance on standard benchmarks, the reasons behind their success are not fully understood. Do these models capture the rich multimodal structures and dynamics from video and text jointly? Or are they achieving high scores by exploiting biases and spurious features? Hence, to provide insights, we design $textit{QUAG}$ (QUadrant AveraGe), a lightweight and non-parametric probe, to conduct dataset-model combined representation analysis by impairing modality fusion. We find that the models achieve high performance on many datasets without leveraging multimodal representations. To validate QUAG further, we design $textit{QUAG-attention}$, a less-expressive replacement of self-attention with restricted token interactions. Models with QUAG-attention achieve similar performance with significantly fewer multiplication operations without any finetuning. Our findings raise doubts about the current models' abilities to learn highly-coupled multimodal representations. Hence, we design the $textit{CLAVI}$ (Complements in LAnguage and VIdeo) dataset, a stress-test dataset curated by augmenting real-world videos to have high modality coupling. Consistent with the findings of QUAG, we find that most of the models achieve near-trivial performance on CLAVI. This reasserts the limitations of current models for learning highly-coupled multimodal representations, that is not evaluated by the current datasets (project page: https://dissect-videoqa.github.io ).
Read more6/10/2024
💬
0
Assessing Modality Bias in Video Question Answering Benchmarks with Multimodal Large Language Models
Jean Park, Kuk Jin Jang, Basam Alasaly, Sriharsha Mopidevi, Andrew Zolensky, Eric Eaton, Insup Lee, Kevin Johnson
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can simultaneously process visual, textual, and auditory data, capturing insights that complement human analysis. However, existing video question-answering (VidQA) benchmarks and datasets often exhibit a bias toward a single modality, despite the goal of requiring advanced reasoning skills that integrate diverse modalities to answer the queries. In this work, we introduce the modality importance score (MIS) to identify such bias. It is designed to assess which modality embeds the necessary information to answer the question. Additionally, we propose an innovative method using state-of-the-art MLLMs to estimate the modality importance, which can serve as a proxy for human judgments of modality perception. With this MIS, we demonstrate the presence of unimodal bias and the scarcity of genuinely multimodal questions in existing datasets. We further validate the modality importance score with multiple ablation studies to evaluate the performance of MLLMs on permuted feature sets. Our results indicate that current models do not effectively integrate information due to modality imbalance in existing datasets. Our proposed MLLM-derived MIS can guide the curation of modality-balanced datasets that advance multimodal learning and enhance MLLMs' capabilities to understand and utilize synergistic relations across modalities.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Weakly Supervised Gaussian Contrastive Grounding with Large Multimodal Models for Video Question Answering
Haibo Wang, Chenghang Lai, Yixuan Sun, Weifeng Ge
Video Question Answering (VideoQA) aims to answer natural language questions based on the information observed in videos. Despite the recent success of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in image-language understanding and reasoning, they deal with VideoQA insufficiently, by simply taking uniformly sampled frames as visual inputs, which ignores question-relevant visual clues. Moreover, there are no human annotations for question-critical timestamps in existing VideoQA datasets. In light of this, we propose a novel weakly supervised framework to enforce the LMMs to reason out the answers with question-critical moments as visual inputs. Specifically, we first fuse the question and answer pairs as event descriptions to find multiple keyframes as target moments and pseudo-labels, with the visual-language alignment capability of the CLIP models. With these pseudo-labeled keyframes as additionally weak supervision, we devise a lightweight Gaussian-based Contrastive Grounding (GCG) module. GCG learns multiple Gaussian functions to characterize the temporal structure of the video, and sample question-critical frames as positive moments to be the visual inputs of LMMs. Extensive experiments on several benchmarks verify the effectiveness of our framework, and we achieve substantial improvements compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
Read more7/24/2024
0
LMM-VQA: Advancing Video Quality Assessment with Large Multimodal Models
Qihang Ge, Wei Sun, Yu Zhang, Yunhao Li, Zhongpeng Ji, Fengyu Sun, Shangling Jui, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai
The explosive growth of videos on streaming media platforms has underscored the urgent need for effective video quality assessment (VQA) algorithms to monitor and perceptually optimize the quality of streaming videos. However, VQA remains an extremely challenging task due to the diverse video content and the complex spatial and temporal distortions, thus necessitating more advanced methods to address these issues. Nowadays, large multimodal models (LMMs), such as GPT-4V, have exhibited strong capabilities for various visual understanding tasks, motivating us to leverage the powerful multimodal representation ability of LMMs to solve the VQA task. Therefore, we propose the first Large Multi-Modal Video Quality Assessment (LMM-VQA) model, which introduces a novel spatiotemporal visual modeling strategy for quality-aware feature extraction. Specifically, we first reformulate the quality regression problem into a question and answering (Q&A) task and construct Q&A prompts for VQA instruction tuning. Then, we design a spatiotemporal vision encoder to extract spatial and temporal features to represent the quality characteristics of videos, which are subsequently mapped into the language space by the spatiotemporal projector for modality alignment. Finally, the aligned visual tokens and the quality-inquired text tokens are aggregated as inputs for the large language model (LLM) to generate the quality score and level. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LMM-VQA achieves state-of-the-art performance across five VQA benchmarks, exhibiting an average improvement of $5%$ in generalization ability over existing methods. Furthermore, due to the advanced design of the spatiotemporal encoder and projector, LMM-VQA also performs exceptionally well on general video understanding tasks, further validating its effectiveness. Our code will be released at https://github.com/Sueqk/LMM-VQA.
Read more8/27/2024