Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection: Fundamental Hardness and Near-Optimal Algorithm
2404.03578
0
0
🏅
Abstract
The sim-to-real gap, which represents the disparity between training and testing environments, poses a significant challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). A promising approach to addressing this challenge is distributionally robust RL, often framed as a robust Markov decision process (RMDP). In this framework, the objective is to find a robust policy that achieves good performance under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set centered around the training environment. Unlike previous work, which relies on a generative model or a pre-collected offline dataset enjoying good coverage of the deployment environment, we tackle robust RL via interactive data collection, where the learner interacts with the training environment only and refines the policy through trial and error. In this robust RL paradigm, two main challenges emerge: managing distributional robustness while striking a balance between exploration and exploitation during data collection. Initially, we establish that sample-efficient learning without additional assumptions is unattainable owing to the curse of support shift; i.e., the potential disjointedness of the distributional supports between the training and testing environments. To circumvent such a hardness result, we introduce the vanishing minimal value assumption to RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set, postulating that the minimal value of the optimal robust value function is zero. We prove that such an assumption effectively eliminates the support shift issue for RMDPs with a TV distance robust set, and present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee. Our work makes the initial step to uncovering the inherent difficulty of robust RL via interactive data collection and sufficient conditions for designing a sample-efficient algorithm accompanied by sharp sample complexity analysis.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the challenge of the "sim-to-real gap" in reinforcement learning (RL), which refers to the disparity between the training and testing environments.
- To address this challenge, the authors explore a promising approach called distributionally robust RL, which is framed as a robust Markov decision process (RMDP).
- The key objective is to find a robust policy that performs well under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set around the training environment.
- Unlike previous work, this paper focuses on robust RL via interactive data collection, where the learner interacts with the training environment only and refines the policy through trial and error.
- Two main challenges emerge in this robust RL paradigm: managing distributional robustness and striking a balance between exploration and exploitation during data collection.
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique used to train artificial agents to make decisions and take actions in complex environments. However, a significant challenge in RL is the "sim-to-real gap," which refers to the difference between the training environment (the "simulation") and the real-world environment where the agent will be deployed.
To address this challenge, the researchers in this paper explore a promising approach called "distributionally robust RL." The key idea is to find a policy (a set of rules for the agent to follow) that performs well not just in the training environment, but also in a range of environments that are similar to the training environment. This is done by defining an "uncertainty set" of possible environments and then optimizing the policy to perform well in the worst-case scenario within that set.
Unlike previous work, which relied on having a pre-existing dataset or a generative model of the deployment environment, this paper focuses on robust RL through interactive data collection. This means the agent learns by interacting with the training environment and refining its policy through trial and error, without any additional information about the real-world environment.
This interactive approach presents two main challenges. First, the agent needs to manage the trade-off between "exploration" (trying new actions to learn more about the environment) and "exploitation" (using what it has already learned to maximize performance). Second, the agent needs to maintain robustness to distributional shifts, even as it is learning and updating its policy.
To address these challenges, the researchers introduce a key assumption called the "vanishing minimal value assumption" for RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set. This assumption effectively eliminates a technical obstacle called the "curse of support shift," which would otherwise make sample-efficient learning impossible. The researchers then present an algorithm with a provable guarantee on its sample complexity (the number of interactions required to learn a good policy).
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a robust reinforcement learning (RL) framework to address the sim-to-real gap, where the objective is to find a policy that performs well under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set around the training environment.
Unlike previous work, which relied on a generative model or a pre-collected offline dataset, the authors tackle robust RL via interactive data collection, where the learner interacts with the training environment only and refines the policy through trial and error. In this setting, two main challenges emerge:
- Managing distributional robustness: The learner needs to maintain robust performance as the policy is updated and the distribution of states and actions changes.
- Balancing exploration and exploitation: The learner must strike a balance between exploring new actions to gather more information and exploiting what has already been learned to maximize performance.
The authors first establish that sample-efficient learning without additional assumptions is unattainable due to the "curse of support shift" - the potential disjointedness of the distributional supports between the training and testing environments.
To overcome this, the authors introduce the "vanishing minimal value assumption" for RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set. This assumption postulates that the minimal value of the optimal robust value function is zero, effectively eliminating the support shift issue. The authors then present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee under this assumption.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes an important contribution by tackling the challenging problem of robust RL in an interactive data collection setting, where the learner has access only to the training environment and must refine the policy through trial and error.
One key strength of the work is the introduction of the "vanishing minimal value assumption," which allows the authors to bypass the "curse of support shift" and derive a sample-efficient algorithm. This assumption seems reasonable for certain problem domains, but its validity may depend on the specific RMDP and uncertainty set being considered.
A potential limitation of the research is the focus on the TV distance as the robustness metric. While this metric is well-studied, it may not capture all relevant aspects of distributional shift, and other robustness measures (e.g., Wasserstein distance) could be worth exploring.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the practical implementation details or empirical performance of the proposed algorithm. Validating the theoretical results on real-world RL tasks would be a valuable next step to assess the algorithm's efficacy and scalability.
Overall, this work makes a solid contribution to the field of robust RL, laying the groundwork for further research into interactive data collection and distributional robustness. The insights and techniques presented here could inspire novel approaches to bridging the sim-to-real gap in reinforcement learning.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the challenging problem of the "sim-to-real gap" in reinforcement learning by proposing a robust RL framework based on a robust Markov decision process (RMDP) formulation. The key idea is to find a policy that performs well under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set around the training environment.
By focusing on an interactive data collection setting, where the learner refines the policy through trial and error in the training environment, the authors uncover two main challenges: managing distributional robustness and balancing exploration and exploitation. To address these challenges, the researchers introduce the "vanishing minimal value assumption" for RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set, which effectively eliminates a technical obstacle and allows for a sample-efficient algorithm.
This work represents an important step forward in the field of robust reinforcement learning, laying the groundwork for further research into bridging the sim-to-real gap through interactive data collection and distributionally robust RL. The insights and techniques presented here could inspire the development of more practical and scalable solutions to this critical challenge in reinforcement learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
Laixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen, Matthieu Geist, Yuejie Chi
0
0
This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs remained mostly unsettled regardless of the uncertainty set in use. It was unclear if distributional robustness bears any statistical consequences when benchmarked against standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that draws samples based on the nominal MDP, we characterize the sample complexity of RMDPs when the uncertainty set is specified via either the total variation (TV) distance or $chi^2$ divergence. The algorithm studied here is a model-based method called {em distributionally robust value iteration}, which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Somewhat surprisingly, our results uncover that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequence incurred by the robustness requirement depends heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set: in the case w.r.t.~the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs; in the case w.r.t.~the $chi^2$ divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
4/15/2024
🐍
Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes
He Wang, Laixi Shi, Yuejie Chi
0
0
In offline reinforcement learning (RL), the absence of active exploration calls for attention on the model robustness to tackle the sim-to-real gap, where the discrepancy between the simulated and deployed environments can significantly undermine the performance of the learned policy. To endow the learned policy with robustness in a sample-efficient manner in the presence of high-dimensional state-action space, this paper considers the sample complexity of distributionally robust linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an uncertainty set characterized by the total variation distance using offline data. We develop a pessimistic model-based algorithm and establish its sample complexity bound under minimal data coverage assumptions, which outperforms prior art by at least $widetilde{O}(d)$, where $d$ is the feature dimension. We further improve the performance guarantee of the proposed algorithm by incorporating a carefully-designed variance estimator.
6/28/2024
Sample-Efficient Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the Face of Environmental Uncertainty
Laixi Shi, Eric Mazumdar, Yuejie Chi, Adam Wierman
0
0
To overcome the sim-to-real gap in reinforcement learning (RL), learned policies must maintain robustness against environmental uncertainties. While robust RL has been widely studied in single-agent regimes, in multi-agent environments, the problem remains understudied -- despite the fact that the problems posed by environmental uncertainties are often exacerbated by strategic interactions. This work focuses on learning in distributionally robust Markov games (RMGs), a robust variant of standard Markov games, wherein each agent aims to learn a policy that maximizes its own worst-case performance when the deployed environment deviates within its own prescribed uncertainty set. This results in a set of robust equilibrium strategies for all agents that align with classic notions of game-theoretic equilibria. Assuming a non-adaptive sampling mechanism from a generative model, we propose a sample-efficient model-based algorithm (DRNVI) with finite-sample complexity guarantees for learning robust variants of various notions of game-theoretic equilibria. We also establish an information-theoretic lower bound for solving RMGs, which confirms the near-optimal sample complexity of DRNVI with respect to problem-dependent factors such as the size of the state space, the target accuracy, and the horizon length.
5/10/2024
Distributionally Robust Constrained Reinforcement Learning under Strong Duality
Zhengfei Zhang, Kishan Panaganti, Laixi Shi, Yanan Sui, Adam Wierman, Yisong Yue
0
0
We study the problem of Distributionally Robust Constrained RL (DRC-RL), where the goal is to maximize the expected reward subject to environmental distribution shifts and constraints. This setting captures situations where training and testing environments differ, and policies must satisfy constraints motivated by safety or limited budgets. Despite significant progress toward algorithm design for the separate problems of distributionally robust RL and constrained RL, there do not yet exist algorithms with end-to-end convergence guarantees for DRC-RL. We develop an algorithmic framework based on strong duality that enables the first efficient and provable solution in a class of environmental uncertainties. Further, our framework exposes an inherent structure of DRC-RL that arises from the combination of distributional robustness and constraints, which prevents a popular class of iterative methods from tractably solving DRC-RL, despite such frameworks being applicable for each of distributionally robust RL and constrained RL individually. Finally, we conduct experiments on a car racing benchmark to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
6/26/2024