The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
2305.16589
0
0
🏅
Abstract
This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs remained mostly unsettled regardless of the uncertainty set in use. It was unclear if distributional robustness bears any statistical consequences when benchmarked against standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that draws samples based on the nominal MDP, we characterize the sample complexity of RMDPs when the uncertainty set is specified via either the total variation (TV) distance or $chi^2$ divergence. The algorithm studied here is a model-based method called {em distributionally robust value iteration}, which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Somewhat surprisingly, our results uncover that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequence incurred by the robustness requirement depends heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set: in the case w.r.t.~the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs; in the case w.r.t.~the $chi^2$ divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how to make reinforcement learning (RL) models more robust to differences between the training environment and the real-world deployment environment, known as the "sim-to-real gap".
- The researchers use a framework called "distributionally robust Markov decision processes" (RMDPs) to learn policies that perform well even in the worst-case within a specified uncertainty set around the nominal environment.
- They analyze the sample complexity (the amount of training data required) for RMDPs compared to standard RL methods, considering different types of uncertainty sets.
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique for training AI agents to perform complex tasks by trial-and-error. However, a common challenge is the "sim-to-real gap" - the performance of an RL model can degrade when deployed in the real world, compared to the simulated training environment.
This research aims to make RL models more robust to these differences. The key idea is to use a framework called "distributionally robust Markov decision processes" (RMDPs). Instead of just optimizing for the average-case performance, RMDPs optimize for the worst-case performance within a specified uncertainty set around the nominal training environment.
For example, the uncertainty set could represent different levels of friction, dynamics, or task objectives that the agent might encounter in the real world. The goal is to learn a policy that can handle all of these potential variations.
The researchers analyze the "sample complexity" - the amount of training data required - for RMDPs compared to standard RL methods. Somewhat surprisingly, they find that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard RL. The sample complexity depends heavily on the specific shape and size of the uncertainty set being considered.
The key takeaway is that distributionally robust RL can be a powerful tool for bridging the sim-to-real gap, but the benefits depend on carefully specifying the right uncertainty set for the problem at hand. This research provides important insights to help practitioners apply distributionally robust RL techniques effectively.
Technical Explanation
The paper adopts the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), which aims to learn a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP.
The researchers analyze the sample complexity of RMDPs, assuming access to a generative model that can draw samples from the nominal MDP. They characterize the sample complexity when the uncertainty set is specified using either the total variation (TV) distance or the chi-squared divergence.
The algorithm studied is a model-based method called "distributionally robust value iteration", which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Interestingly, the results reveal that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequences of the robustness requirement depend heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set:
- For uncertainty sets defined by the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs.
- For uncertainty sets defined by the chi-squared divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
These findings provide important insights into the practical application of distributionally robust RL techniques and the statistical tradeoffs involved.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and rigorous analysis of the sample complexity for distributionally robust RL. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The analysis is focused on the sample complexity, but does not directly address other important practical considerations, such as the computational complexity of the algorithms or the difficulty of specifying the appropriate uncertainty sets in real-world applications.
-
The results are derived under the assumption of access to a perfect generative model of the nominal MDP. In practice, this may not always be the case, and the impact of model misspecification or limited generative data should be explored.
-
The paper only considers two specific types of uncertainty sets (TV distance and chi-squared divergence). It would be valuable to understand how the results generalize to other types of uncertainty sets that may be more suitable for certain applications.
-
While the paper provides a comparative analysis between RMDPs and standard MDPs, it does not directly benchmark the performance of the distributionally robust methods against other approaches for bridging the sim-to-real gap, such as domain randomization or meta-learning. Empirical comparisons would help practitioners decide which techniques to apply in their specific use cases.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of the statistical implications of distributionally robust RL. However, continued research is needed to fully address the practical challenges and tradeoffs involved in applying these techniques in real-world settings.
Conclusion
This paper investigates the sample complexity of distributionally robust reinforcement learning (RL) as a way to reduce the "sim-to-real gap" - the performance degradation when deploying RL models in the real world compared to the simulated training environment.
The key idea is to use a framework called "distributionally robust Markov decision processes" (RMDPs), which optimizes for the worst-case performance within a specified uncertainty set around the nominal training environment. The researchers analyze the sample complexity of RMDPs compared to standard RL methods, considering different types of uncertainty sets.
While RMDPs do not necessarily have higher or lower sample complexity than standard RL, the results show that the statistical tradeoffs depend heavily on the specific shape and size of the uncertainty set. This provides important guidance for practitioners on how to effectively apply distributionally robust RL techniques to bridge the sim-to-real gap in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection: Fundamental Hardness and Near-Optimal Algorithm
Miao Lu, Han Zhong, Tong Zhang, Jose Blanchet
0
0
The sim-to-real gap, which represents the disparity between training and testing environments, poses a significant challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). A promising approach to addressing this challenge is distributionally robust RL, often framed as a robust Markov decision process (RMDP). In this framework, the objective is to find a robust policy that achieves good performance under the worst-case scenario among all environments within a pre-specified uncertainty set centered around the training environment. Unlike previous work, which relies on a generative model or a pre-collected offline dataset enjoying good coverage of the deployment environment, we tackle robust RL via interactive data collection, where the learner interacts with the training environment only and refines the policy through trial and error. In this robust RL paradigm, two main challenges emerge: managing distributional robustness while striking a balance between exploration and exploitation during data collection. Initially, we establish that sample-efficient learning without additional assumptions is unattainable owing to the curse of support shift; i.e., the potential disjointedness of the distributional supports between the training and testing environments. To circumvent such a hardness result, we introduce the vanishing minimal value assumption to RMDPs with a total-variation (TV) distance robust set, postulating that the minimal value of the optimal robust value function is zero. We prove that such an assumption effectively eliminates the support shift issue for RMDPs with a TV distance robust set, and present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee. Our work makes the initial step to uncovering the inherent difficulty of robust RL via interactive data collection and sufficient conditions for designing a sample-efficient algorithm accompanied by sharp sample complexity analysis.
4/5/2024
🐍
Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes
He Wang, Laixi Shi, Yuejie Chi
0
0
In offline reinforcement learning (RL), the absence of active exploration calls for attention on the model robustness to tackle the sim-to-real gap, where the discrepancy between the simulated and deployed environments can significantly undermine the performance of the learned policy. To endow the learned policy with robustness in a sample-efficient manner in the presence of high-dimensional state-action space, this paper considers the sample complexity of distributionally robust linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an uncertainty set characterized by the total variation distance using offline data. We develop a pessimistic model-based algorithm and establish its sample complexity bound under minimal data coverage assumptions, which outperforms prior art by at least $widetilde{O}(d)$, where $d$ is the feature dimension. We further improve the performance guarantee of the proposed algorithm by incorporating a carefully-designed variance estimator.
6/28/2024
🏅
Towards Minimax Optimality of Model-based Robust Reinforcement Learning
Pierre Clavier, Erwan Le Pennec, Matthieu Geist
0
0
We study the sample complexity of obtaining an $epsilon$-optimal policy in emph{Robust} discounted Markov Decision Processes (RMDPs), given only access to a generative model of the nominal kernel. This problem is widely studied in the non-robust case, and it is known that any planning approach applied to an empirical MDP estimated with $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^3 mid S midmid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ samples provides an $epsilon$-optimal policy, which is minimax optimal. Results in the robust case are much more scarce. For $sa$- (resp $s$-)rectangular uncertainty sets, the best known sample complexity is $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S mid^2mid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ (resp. $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S mid^2mid A mid^2}{epsilon^2})$), for specific algorithms and when the uncertainty set is based on the total variation (TV), the KL or the Chi-square divergences. In this paper, we consider uncertainty sets defined with an $L_p$-ball (recovering the TV case), and study the sample complexity of emph{any} planning algorithm (with high accuracy guarantee on the solution) applied to an empirical RMDP estimated using the generative model. In the general case, we prove a sample complexity of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^4 mid S midmid A mid}{epsilon^2})$ for both the $sa$- and $s$-rectangular cases (improvements of $mid S mid$ and $mid S midmid A mid$ respectively). When the size of the uncertainty is small enough, we improve the sample complexity to $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{H^3 mid S midmid A mid }{epsilon^2})$, recovering the lower-bound for the non-robust case for the first time and a robust lower-bound when the size of the uncertainty is small enough.
6/7/2024
Sample-Efficient Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in the Face of Environmental Uncertainty
Laixi Shi, Eric Mazumdar, Yuejie Chi, Adam Wierman
0
0
To overcome the sim-to-real gap in reinforcement learning (RL), learned policies must maintain robustness against environmental uncertainties. While robust RL has been widely studied in single-agent regimes, in multi-agent environments, the problem remains understudied -- despite the fact that the problems posed by environmental uncertainties are often exacerbated by strategic interactions. This work focuses on learning in distributionally robust Markov games (RMGs), a robust variant of standard Markov games, wherein each agent aims to learn a policy that maximizes its own worst-case performance when the deployed environment deviates within its own prescribed uncertainty set. This results in a set of robust equilibrium strategies for all agents that align with classic notions of game-theoretic equilibria. Assuming a non-adaptive sampling mechanism from a generative model, we propose a sample-efficient model-based algorithm (DRNVI) with finite-sample complexity guarantees for learning robust variants of various notions of game-theoretic equilibria. We also establish an information-theoretic lower bound for solving RMGs, which confirms the near-optimal sample complexity of DRNVI with respect to problem-dependent factors such as the size of the state space, the target accuracy, and the horizon length.
5/10/2024