Dynamic Game-Theoretical Decision-Making Framework for Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction with Human Bounded Rationality
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a dynamic game-theoretical decision-making framework for vehicle-pedestrian interaction that considers human bounded rationality.
- The framework models the decision-making process of both the vehicle and the pedestrian as a Stackelberg game, where the vehicle acts as the leader and the pedestrian as the follower.
- The pedestrian's bounded rationality is represented using a quantal response model, which captures their imperfect decision-making.
- The framework is designed to improve the safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicle navigation in mixed traffic environments.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way of modeling the interaction between vehicles and pedestrians in traffic situations. The proposed framework models this interaction as a type of game called a Stackelberg game, where one player (the vehicle) makes the first move and the other player (the pedestrian) responds.
Importantly, the framework takes into account the fact that human pedestrians don't always make perfectly rational decisions. Instead, the pedestrian's decision-making is represented using a "quantal response model," which captures the idea that people sometimes make suboptimal choices, especially in complex or uncertain situations.
By modeling vehicle-pedestrian interaction this way, the researchers aim to create more realistic and effective decision-making algorithms for autonomous vehicles. This could help make self-driving cars better at navigating busy urban environments with pedestrians, improving both safety and efficiency.
Technical Explanation
The paper's key innovation is the use of a Stackelberg game to model the decision-making process between a vehicle and a pedestrian. In this type of game, the vehicle acts as the leader by making the first move, and the pedestrian responds as the follower.
The vehicle's objective is to navigate the environment safely and efficiently, while the pedestrian's objective is to cross the road safely. The paper models the pedestrian's decision-making using a quantal response model, which assumes that the pedestrian has bounded rationality and may not always make the fully optimal choice.
The framework uses this Stackelberg game structure to predict the likely outcomes of vehicle-pedestrian interactions, allowing the autonomous vehicle to make more informed decisions about how to proceed. This integrated decision-making approach is designed to enhance the safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicle navigation in mixed traffic environments.
Critical Analysis
The paper's main strength is its novel application of game theory and bounded rationality concepts to the problem of vehicle-pedestrian interaction. By incorporating the pedestrian's likely suboptimal decision-making, the framework offers a more realistic and nuanced model of this type of interaction.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the model assumes that the vehicle and pedestrian have full information about each other's objectives and decision-making processes, which may not always be the case in real-world situations. Additional research may be needed to understand how the framework performs when there is information asymmetry or uncertainty.
Furthermore, the paper does not provide extensive empirical validation of the framework's performance, relying primarily on simulation-based experiments. More real-world testing and evaluation would be helpful to assess the framework's practical effectiveness.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising new approach to modeling vehicle-pedestrian interaction that takes into account human bounded rationality. By framing the decision-making process as a Stackelberg game, the framework offers a more realistic and nuanced representation of this type of interaction.
If further developed and validated, this type of game-theoretic decision-making framework could significantly enhance the safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicle navigation in mixed traffic environments. The incorporation of bounded rationality is a valuable contribution that could lead to more robust and socially-aware autonomous driving systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Dynamic Game-Theoretical Decision-Making Framework for Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction with Human Bounded Rationality
Meiting Dang, Dezong Zhao, Yafei Wang, Chongfeng Wei
Human-involved interactive environments pose significant challenges for autonomous vehicle decision-making processes due to the complexity and uncertainty of human behavior. It is crucial to develop an explainable and trustworthy decision-making system for autonomous vehicles interacting with pedestrians. Previous studies often used traditional game theory to describe interactions for its interpretability. However, it assumes complete human rationality and unlimited reasoning abilities, which is unrealistic. To solve this limitation and improve model accuracy, this paper proposes a novel framework that integrates the partially observable markov decision process with behavioral game theory to dynamically model AV-pedestrian interactions at the unsignalized intersection. Both the AV and the pedestrian are modeled as dynamic-belief-induced quantal cognitive hierarchy (DB-QCH) models, considering human reasoning limitations and bounded rationality in the decision-making process. In addition, a dynamic belief updating mechanism allows the AV to update its understanding of the opponent's rationality degree in real-time based on observed behaviors and adapt its strategies accordingly. The analysis results indicate that our models effectively simulate vehicle-pedestrian interactions and our proposed AV decision-making approach performs well in safety, efficiency, and smoothness. It closely resembles real-world driving behavior and even achieves more comfortable driving navigation compared to our previous virtual reality experimental data.
Read more9/25/2024
✅
0
Solution Concepts in Hierarchical Games under Bounded Rationality with Applications to Autonomous Driving
Atrisha Sarkar, Krzysztof Czarnecki
With autonomous vehicles (AV) set to integrate further into regular human traffic, there is an increasing consensus on treating AV motion planning as a multi-agent problem. However, the traditional game-theoretic assumption of complete rationality is too strong for human driving, and there is a need for understanding human driving as a emph{bounded rational} activity through a behavioural game-theoretic lens. To that end, we adapt four metamodels of bounded rational behaviour: three based on Quantal level-k and one based on Nash equilibrium with quantal errors. We formalize the different solution concepts that can be applied in the context of hierarchical games, a framework used in multi-agent motion planning, for the purpose of creating game theoretic models of driving behaviour. Furthermore, based on a contributed dataset of human driving at a busy urban intersection with a total of approximately 4k agents and 44k decision points, we evaluate the behaviour models on the basis of model fit to naturalistic data, as well as their predictive capacity. Our results suggest that among the behaviour models evaluated, at the level of maneuvers, modeling driving behaviour as an adaptation of the Quantal level-k model with level-0 behaviour modelled as pure rule-following provides the best fit to naturalistic driving behaviour. At the level of trajectories, bounds sampling of actions and a maxmax non-strategic models is the most accurate within the set of models in comparison. We also find a significant impact of situational factors on the performance of behaviour models.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Integrated Decision Making and Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving Under Multimodal Uncertainties: A Bayesian Game Approach
Zhenmin Huang, Tong Li, Shaojie Shen, Jun Ma
Modeling the interaction between traffic agents is a key issue in designing safe and non-conservative maneuvers in autonomous driving. This problem can be challenging when multi-modality and behavioral uncertainties are engaged. Existing methods either fail to plan interactively or consider unimodal behaviors that could lead to catastrophic results. In this paper, we introduce an integrated decision-making and trajectory planning framework based on Bayesian game (i.e., game of incomplete information). Human decisions inherently exhibit discrete characteristics and therefore are modeled as types of players in the game. A general solver based on no-regret learning is introduced to obtain a corresponding Bayesian Coarse Correlated Equilibrium, which captures the interaction between traffic agents in the multimodal context. With the attained equilibrium, decision-making and trajectory planning are performed simultaneously, and the resulting interactive strategy is shown to be optimal over the expectation of rivals' driving intentions. Closed-loop simulations on different traffic scenarios are performed to illustrate the generalizability and the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Read more9/24/2024
0
Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making Framework for Considering Malicious Behavior at Unsignalized Intersections
Qing Li, Jinxing Hua, Qiuxia Sun
In this paper, we propose a Q-learning based decision-making framework to improve the safety and efficiency of Autonomous Vehicles when they encounter other maliciously behaving vehicles while passing through unsignalized intersections. In Autonomous Vehicles, conventional reward signals are set as regular rewards regarding feedback factors such as safety and efficiency. In this paper, safety gains are modulated by variable weighting parameters to ensure that safety can be emphasized more in emergency situations. The framework proposed in this paper introduces first-order theory of mind inferences on top of conventional rewards, using first-order beliefs as additional reward signals. The decision framework enables Autonomous Vehicles to make informed decisions when encountering vehicles with potentially malicious behaviors at unsignalized intersections, thereby improving the overall safety and efficiency of Autonomous Vehicle transportation systems. In order to verify the performance of the decision framework, this paper uses Prescan/Simulink co-simulations for simulation, and the results show that the performance of the decision framework can meet the set requirements.
Read more9/27/2024