Dynamic Pricing for Electric Vehicle Charging

Read original: arXiv:2408.14169 - Published 8/27/2024 by Arun Kumar Kalakanti, Shrisha Rao
Total Score

0

Dynamic Pricing for Electric Vehicle Charging

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a dynamic pricing model for electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure.
  • The goal is to maximize the overall utility and profit for EV charging station operators while considering user preferences and grid constraints.
  • The authors develop a two-stage optimization problem that determines optimal prices and allocates charging slots.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a dynamic pricing model for EV charging stations. The key idea is to adjust prices in real-time to balance supply and demand, while also considering the constraints of the electrical grid.

The model works as follows:

  • EV users submit their charging preferences, like how much charge they need and when.
  • The charging station operator then determines the optimal prices to charge each user, with the goal of maximizing their overall profit and utilization of the charging infrastructure.
  • This pricing is done in a way that also takes into account the capacity limits of the electrical grid to avoid overloading it.

The key benefit of this approach is that it allows EV charging stations to dynamically adjust their prices to match supply and demand, similar to how airlines and hotels adjust their pricing. This can help maximize the stations' revenue and ensure the grid is not overloaded.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the EV charging pricing problem as a two-stage optimization. In the first stage, the charging station operator determines the optimal prices to charge each EV user based on their preferences and the station's capacity.

The objective is to maximize the overall utility, which is a function of the users' willingness to pay and the operator's profit. Constraints include the available charging slots and the grid's power capacity.

In the second stage, the charging allocations are determined based on the prices set in the first stage. Users are assigned to charging slots in a way that maximizes their individual utility, subject to the prices and grid constraints.

The authors propose a decomposition approach to solve this bilevel optimization problem efficiently. Numerical simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the dynamic pricing strategy in improving station revenue and grid utilization compared to static pricing schemes.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed optimization framework for dynamic EV charging pricing. However, a few caveats and limitations are worth noting:

  • The model assumes users truthfully report their charging preferences. In practice, users may strategize to get lower prices, which could impact the optimization.
  • The grid capacity constraints are modeled in a simplistic way. More realistic grid models with power flow constraints could lead to different pricing outcomes.
  • The simulations are conducted on a small-scale test system. Scaling the approach to large, real-world networks with many charging stations and grid constraints may introduce additional challenges.

Further research could explore game-theoretic formulations to account for strategic user behavior, as well as incorporate more detailed grid models and larger-scale validation of the dynamic pricing approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising optimization-based framework for dynamic pricing of EV charging infrastructure. By adjusting prices in real-time, the model can help charging station operators maximize their revenue and utilization, while also considering the constraints of the electrical grid.

The proposed approach has the potential to be a valuable tool for managing the growing demand for EV charging, particularly as the number of EVs on the road continues to increase. With further refinement and real-world validation, the dynamic pricing strategy could become an important component of the sustainable mobility ecosystem.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Dynamic Pricing for Electric Vehicle Charging
Total Score

0

Dynamic Pricing for Electric Vehicle Charging

Arun Kumar Kalakanti, Shrisha Rao

Dynamic pricing is a promising strategy to address the challenges of smart charging, as traditional time-of-use (ToU) rates and stationary pricing (SP) do not dynamically react to changes in operating conditions, reducing revenue for charging station (CS) vendors and affecting grid stability. Previous studies evaluated single objectives or linear combinations of objectives for EV CS pricing solutions, simplifying trade-offs and preferences among objectives. We develop a novel formulation for the dynamic pricing problem by addressing multiple conflicting objectives efficiently instead of solely focusing on one objective or metric, as in earlier works. We find optimal trade-offs or Pareto solutions efficiently using Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms (NSGA) II and NSGA III. A dynamic pricing model quantifies the relationship between demand and price while simultaneously solving multiple conflicting objectives, such as revenue, quality of service (QoS), and peak-to-average ratios (PAR). A single method can only address some of the above aspects of dynamic pricing comprehensively. We present a three-part dynamic pricing approach using a Bayesian model, multi-objective optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) using pseudo-weight vectors. To address the research gap in CS pricing, our method selects solutions using revenue, QoS, and PAR metrics simultaneously. Two California charging sites' real-world data validates our approach.

Read more

8/27/2024

Decentralized Collaborative Pricing and Shunting for Multiple EV Charging Stations Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Decentralized Collaborative Pricing and Shunting for Multiple EV Charging Stations Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Tianhao Bu, Hang Li, Guojie Li

The extraordinary electric vehicle (EV) popularization in the recent years has facilitated research studies in alleviating EV energy charging demand. Previous studies primarily focused on the optimizations over charging stations (CS) profit and EV users cost savings through charge/discharge scheduling events. In this work, the random behaviors of EVs are considered, with EV users preferences over multi-CS characteristics modelled to imitate the potential CS selection disequilibrium. A price scheduling strategy under decentralized collaborative framework is proposed to achieve EV shunting in a multi-CS environment, while minimizing the charging cost through multi agent reinforcement learning. The proposed problem is formulated as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with uncertain transition probability.

Read more

6/18/2024

Learning and Optimization for Price-based Demand Response of Electric Vehicle Charging
Total Score

0

Learning and Optimization for Price-based Demand Response of Electric Vehicle Charging

Chengyang Gu, Yuxin Pan, Ruohong Liu, Yize Chen

In the context of charging electric vehicles (EVs), the price-based demand response (PBDR) is becoming increasingly significant for charging load management. Such response usually encourages cost-sensitive customers to adjust their energy demand in response to changes in price for financial incentives. Thus, to model and optimize EV charging, it is important for charging station operator to model the PBDR patterns of EV customers by precisely predicting charging demands given price signals. Then the operator refers to these demands to optimize charging station power allocation policy. The standard pipeline involves offline fitting of a PBDR function based on historical EV charging records, followed by applying estimated EV demands in downstream charging station operation optimization. In this work, we propose a new decision-focused end-to-end framework for PBDR modeling that combines prediction errors and downstream optimization cost errors in the model learning stage. We evaluate the effectiveness of our method on a simulation of charging station operation with synthetic PBDR patterns of EV customers, and experimental results demonstrate that this framework can provide a more reliable prediction model for the ultimate optimization process, leading to more effective optimization solutions in terms of cost savings and charging station operation objectives with only a few training samples.

Read more

4/17/2024

Network-Aware and Welfare-Maximizing Dynamic Pricing for Energy Sharing
Total Score

0

Network-Aware and Welfare-Maximizing Dynamic Pricing for Energy Sharing

Ahmed S. Alahmed, Guido Cavraro, Andrey Bernstein, Lang Tong

The proliferation of behind-the-meter (BTM) distributed energy resources (DER) within the electrical distribution network presents significant supply and demand flexibilities, but also introduces operational challenges such as voltage spikes and reverse power flows. In response, this paper proposes a network-aware dynamic pricing framework tailored for energy-sharing coalitions that aggregate small, but ubiquitous, BTM DER downstream of a distribution system operator's (DSO) revenue meter that adopts a generic net energy metering (NEM) tariff. By formulating a Stackelberg game between the energy-sharing market leader and its prosumers, we show that the dynamic pricing policy induces the prosumers toward a network-safe operation and decentrally maximizes the energy-sharing social welfare. The dynamic pricing mechanism involves a combination of a locational {em ex-ante} dynamic price and an {em ex-post} allocation, both of which are functions of the energy sharing's BTM DER. The {em ex-post} allocation is proportionate to the price differential between the DSO NEM price and the energy sharing locational price. Simulation results using real DER data and the IEEE 13-bus test systems illustrate the dynamic nature of network-aware pricing at each bus, and its impact on voltage.

Read more

4/4/2024