Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how ideological biases among social media users can influence the dynamics of opinion evolution over time.
- The researchers use a model of socially-aware networks to simulate the spread of opinions and study the formation of "echo chambers" and polarization.
- The findings provide insights into how the structure and dynamics of social media networks can shape the evolution of public discourse.
Plain English Explanation
The study investigates how the ideological biases of people on social media can affect the way opinions spread and change over time. The researchers use a computer model that simulates social networks, where people's opinions are influenced by the views of their connections.
This allows them to see how "echo chambers" can form, where people only interact with those who share their beliefs, and how polarization can occur, with opinions becoming more extreme. The goal is to understand how the underlying structure and dynamics of social media networks can shape public discourse and the evolution of ideas.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a model of socially-aware networks to study the dynamics of ideological biases among social media users. The network is composed of nodes (users) connected by edges (relationships), and each node has an opinion value that can change over time based on their neighbors' opinions.
The researchers implement several mechanisms to capture key social media dynamics, such as:
- Homophily: Users are more likely to connect with others who hold similar opinions.
- Influence: Users' opinions are influenced by their neighbors' opinions.
- Confirmation bias: Users are more receptive to information that confirms their existing beliefs.
By simulating the evolution of this network over time, the authors analyze the emergence of echo chambers, polarization, and other dynamics related to the spread of opinions on social media.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable theoretical framework for understanding how the structural characteristics of social media networks can shape the evolution of public discourse. However, the model does simplify certain real-world aspects, such as the role of algorithms in curating content and the influence of external events.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential interventions or design choices that could mitigate the negative consequences of echo chambers and polarization. Further research is needed to explore how social media platforms can be designed to foster more constructive and balanced discourse.
Conclusion
This study offers important insights into the dynamics of ideological biases on social media. By modeling the spread of opinions within socially-aware networks, the researchers demonstrate how the underlying structure of these networks can contribute to the formation of echo chambers and polarization. These findings have significant implications for understanding the evolution of public discourse in the digital age and the role of social media in shaping societal debates.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users
Mohammed Shahid Modi, James Flamino, Boleslaw K. Szymanski
Humanity for centuries has perfected skills of interpersonal interactions and evolved patterns that enable people to detect lies and deceiving behavior of others in face-to-face settings. Unprecedented growth of people's access to mobile phones and social media raises an important question: How does this new technology influence people's interactions and support the use of traditional patterns? In this article, we answer this question for homophily-driven patterns in social media. In our previous studies, we found that, on a university campus, changes in student opinions were driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. Here, we demonstrate that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the same desire. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users. On Parler, an initially stable group of Right-biased users evolved into a permanent Right-leaning echo chamber dominating weaker, transient groups of members with opposing political biases. In contrast, on Twitter, the initial presence of two large opposing bias groups led to the evolution of a bimodal bias distribution, with a high degree of polarization. We capture the movement of users from the initial to final bias groups during the tracking period. We also show that user choices are influenced by side-effects of homophily. Users entering the platform attempt to find a sufficiently large group whose members hold political biases within the range sufficiently close to their own. If successful, they stabilize their biases and become permanent members of the group. Otherwise, they leave the platform. We believe that the dynamics of users' behavior uncovered in this article create a foundation for technical solutions supporting social groups on social media and socially aware networks.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Media
Gabriele Di Bona, Emma Fraxanet, Bjorn Komander, Andrea Lo Sasso, Virginia Morini, Antoine Vendeville, Max Falkenberg, Alessandro Galeazzi
Following recent policy changes by X (Twitter) and other social media platforms, user interaction data has become increasingly difficult to access. These restrictions are impeding robust research pertaining to social and political phenomena online, which is critical due to the profound impact social media platforms may have on our societies. Here, we investigate the reliability of polarization measures obtained from different samples of social media data by studying the structural polarization of the Polish political debate on Twitter over a 24-hour period. First, we show that the political discussion on Twitter is only a small subset of the wider Twitter discussion. Second, we find that large samples can be representative of the whole political discussion on a platform, but small samples consistently fail to accurately reflect the true structure of polarization online. Finally, we demonstrate that keyword-based samples can be representative if keywords are selected with great care, but that poorly selected keywords can result in substantial political bias in the sampled data. Our findings demonstrate that it is not possible to measure polarization in a reliable way with small, sampled datasets, highlighting why the current lack of research data is so problematic, and providing insight into the practical implementation of the European Union's Digital Service Act which aims to improve researchers' access to social media data.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Authenticity and exclusion: social media recommendation algorithms and the dynamics of belonging in professional networks
Nil-Jana Akpinar, Sina Fazelpour
Homophily - the attraction of similarity - profoundly influences social interactions, affecting associations, information disclosure, and the dynamics of social exchanges. Organizational studies reveal that when professional and personal boundaries overlap, individuals from minority backgrounds often encounter a dilemma between authenticity and inclusion due to these homophily-driven dynamics: if they disclose their genuine interests, they risk exclusion from the broader conversation. Conversely, to gain inclusion, they might feel pressured to assimilate. How might the nature and design of social media platforms, where different conversational contexts frequently collapse, and the recommender algorithms that are at the heart of these platforms, which can prioritize content based on network structure and historical user engagement, impact these dynamics? In this paper, we employ agent-based simulations to investigate this question. Our findings indicate a decline in the visibility of professional content generated by minority groups, a trend that is exacerbated over time by recommendation algorithms. Within these minority communities, users who closely resemble the majority group tend to receive greater visibility. We examine the philosophical and design implications of our results, discussing their relevance to questions of informational justice, inclusion, and the epistemic benefits of diversity.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs
Stephen Scarano, Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan, Mattia Samory, Kai-Cheng Yang, JungHwan Yang, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
Social media platforms allow users to create polls to gather public opinion on diverse topics. However, we know little about what such polls are used for and how reliable they are, especially in significant contexts like elections. Focusing on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S., this study shows that outcomes of election polls on Twitter deviate from election results despite their prevalence. Leveraging demographic inference and statistical analysis, we find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by older males and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump relative to representative mainstream polls. We investigate potential sources of biased outcomes from the point of view of inauthentic, automated, and counter-normative behavior. Using social media experiments and interviews with poll authors, we identify inconsistencies between public vote counts and those privately visible to poll authors, with the gap potentially attributable to purchased votes. We also find that Twitter accounts participating in election polls are more likely to be bots, and election poll outcomes tend to be more biased, before the election day than after. Finally, we identify instances of polls spreading voter fraud conspiracy theories and estimate that a couple thousand of such polls were posted in 2020. The study discusses the implications of biased election polls in the context of transparency and accountability of social media platforms.
Read more6/4/2024