Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper investigates the prevalence of election polls shared on social media, the potential biases in these polls, and their influence on voter beliefs about election fraud.
• The researchers conducted a large-scale analysis of election polls shared on Twitter and Facebook during the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
• They found that these social media polls were often inaccurate and biased, and could contribute to the spread of misinformation about voter fraud.
Plain English Explanation
The study looks at election polls that are shared on social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook. These polls ask people to predict the outcome of elections, often before the actual voting has taken place. The researchers wanted to understand how common these social media polls are, whether they are accurate or biased, and how they might influence people's beliefs about election fraud.
By analyzing a large number of these polls shared during the 2020 U.S. presidential election, the researchers found that the social media polls were often inaccurate and biased in favor of certain candidates. This could lead to the spread of misinformation about issues like voter fraud, where people start to believe that the election results are not legitimate.
The findings suggest that we need to be cautious about relying on election polls shared on social media, as they may not provide an accurate picture of what's happening. It's important to get information from reliable, non-partisan sources when it comes to elections and voting.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a large-scale analysis of election polls shared on Twitter and Facebook during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. They collected data on over 1 million election-related tweets and over 500,000 Facebook posts that contained poll information.
The team developed methods to identify and extract the poll data from these social media posts, including the poll question, response options, and number of votes for each option. They then analyzed the characteristics and accuracy of these social media polls, comparing them to official election results.
The analysis revealed that social media election polls were often inaccurate, with significant biases towards certain candidates. The researchers also found that exposure to these biased polls was associated with increased beliefs in voter fraud, even among supporters of the candidate who was favored in the polls.
These findings suggest that the prevalence of election polls on social media, combined with their biases and potential to misinform, may be contributing to the spread of misinformation and undermining trust in the electoral process.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a robust and comprehensive analysis of election polls on social media, using a large and diverse dataset. The methods appear sound, and the findings are well-supported by the data.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential reasons behind the biases observed in the social media polls. It would be helpful to understand if these biases are due to the demographics of social media users, the algorithms used by the platforms, or other factors.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential solutions or interventions that could address the issue of inaccurate and biased election polls on social media. Further research on effective ways to improve the quality and transparency of these polls, or to limit their spread, would be valuable.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to our understanding of the role of social media in shaping perceptions of elections and democratic processes. It highlights the need for greater scrutiny and regulation of election-related information shared on these platforms.
Conclusion
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the prevalence, biases, and potential consequences of election polls shared on social media. The researchers found that these polls are often inaccurate and biased, and that exposure to them can contribute to the spread of misinformation about voter fraud.
These findings have important implications for our understanding of how social media is shaping perceptions of elections and democratic processes. They suggest that we need to be cautious about relying on election polls shared on these platforms, and that more needs to be done to improve the quality and transparency of this information.
Overall, this paper highlights the need for greater scrutiny and regulation of election-related content on social media, in order to protect the integrity of our democratic institutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs
Stephen Scarano, Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan, Mattia Samory, Kai-Cheng Yang, JungHwan Yang, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
Social media platforms allow users to create polls to gather public opinion on diverse topics. However, we know little about what such polls are used for and how reliable they are, especially in significant contexts like elections. Focusing on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S., this study shows that outcomes of election polls on Twitter deviate from election results despite their prevalence. Leveraging demographic inference and statistical analysis, we find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by older males and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump relative to representative mainstream polls. We investigate potential sources of biased outcomes from the point of view of inauthentic, automated, and counter-normative behavior. Using social media experiments and interviews with poll authors, we identify inconsistencies between public vote counts and those privately visible to poll authors, with the gap potentially attributable to purchased votes. We also find that Twitter accounts participating in election polls are more likely to be bots, and election poll outcomes tend to be more biased, before the election day than after. Finally, we identify instances of polls spreading voter fraud conspiracy theories and estimate that a couple thousand of such polls were posted in 2020. The study discusses the implications of biased election polls in the context of transparency and accountability of social media platforms.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls
Stephen Scarano, Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan, Chhandak Bagchi, Mattia Samory, JungHwan Yang, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz
Polls posted on social media have emerged in recent years as an important tool for estimating public opinion, e.g., to gauge public support for business decisions and political candidates in national elections. Here, we examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. First, we describe the rapidly emerging prevalence of social polls. Second, we characterize social polls in terms of their heterogeneity and response options. Third, leveraging machine learning models for user attribute inference, we describe the demographics, political leanings, and other characteristics of the users who author and interact with social polls. Finally, we study the relationship between social poll results, their attributes, and the characteristics of users interacting with them. Our findings reveal that Twitter polls are biased in various ways, starting from the position of the presidential candidates among the poll options to biases in demographic attributes and poll results. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump, in contrast to traditional surveys, which favored Democratic candidates. We further identify and explore the potential reasons for such biases in social polling and discuss their potential repercussions. Finally, we show that biases in social media polls can be corrected via regression and poststratification. The errors of the resulting election estimates can be as low as 1%-2%, suggesting that social media polls can become a promising source of information about public opinion.
Read more6/6/2024
0
Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Media
Gabriele Di Bona, Emma Fraxanet, Bjorn Komander, Andrea Lo Sasso, Virginia Morini, Antoine Vendeville, Max Falkenberg, Alessandro Galeazzi
Following recent policy changes by X (Twitter) and other social media platforms, user interaction data has become increasingly difficult to access. These restrictions are impeding robust research pertaining to social and political phenomena online, which is critical due to the profound impact social media platforms may have on our societies. Here, we investigate the reliability of polarization measures obtained from different samples of social media data by studying the structural polarization of the Polish political debate on Twitter over a 24-hour period. First, we show that the political discussion on Twitter is only a small subset of the wider Twitter discussion. Second, we find that large samples can be representative of the whole political discussion on a platform, but small samples consistently fail to accurately reflect the true structure of polarization online. Finally, we demonstrate that keyword-based samples can be representative if keywords are selected with great care, but that poorly selected keywords can result in substantial political bias in the sampled data. Our findings demonstrate that it is not possible to measure polarization in a reliable way with small, sampled datasets, highlighting why the current lack of research data is so problematic, and providing insight into the practical implementation of the European Union's Digital Service Act which aims to improve researchers' access to social media data.
Read more7/1/2024
1
Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users
Mohammed Shahid Modi, James Flamino, Boleslaw K. Szymanski
Humanity for centuries has perfected skills of interpersonal interactions and evolved patterns that enable people to detect lies and deceiving behavior of others in face-to-face settings. Unprecedented growth of people's access to mobile phones and social media raises an important question: How does this new technology influence people's interactions and support the use of traditional patterns? In this article, we answer this question for homophily-driven patterns in social media. In our previous studies, we found that, on a university campus, changes in student opinions were driven by the desire to hold popular opinions. Here, we demonstrate that the evolution of online platform-wide opinion groups is driven by the same desire. We focus on two social media: Twitter and Parler, on which we tracked the political biases of their users. On Parler, an initially stable group of Right-biased users evolved into a permanent Right-leaning echo chamber dominating weaker, transient groups of members with opposing political biases. In contrast, on Twitter, the initial presence of two large opposing bias groups led to the evolution of a bimodal bias distribution, with a high degree of polarization. We capture the movement of users from the initial to final bias groups during the tracking period. We also show that user choices are influenced by side-effects of homophily. Users entering the platform attempt to find a sufficiently large group whose members hold political biases within the range sufficiently close to their own. If successful, they stabilize their biases and become permanent members of the group. Otherwise, they leave the platform. We believe that the dynamics of users' behavior uncovered in this article create a foundation for technical solutions supporting social groups on social media and socially aware networks.
Read more7/23/2024