Edu-Values: Towards Evaluating the Chinese Education Values of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces the Edu-Values benchmark, a new dataset for evaluating the Chinese education values of large language models.
- The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that assess the models' understanding and alignment with traditional Chinese educational principles.
- The authors evaluate several prominent language models on the Edu-Values benchmark and provide insights into their performance and alignment with Chinese educational values.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new dataset called the Edu-Values benchmark to evaluate how well large language models, such as ChatGPT, understand and align with traditional Chinese educational values. This benchmark includes a variety of tasks that assess the models' knowledge and alignment with key principles in the Chinese education system.
By testing several prominent language models on the Edu-Values benchmark, the researchers were able to gain insights into how well these models capture the nuances of Chinese educational values. This can help identify areas where the models may be lacking or misaligned, and inform the development of future models that are more attuned to culturally-specific educational perspectives.
Technical Explanation
The Edu-Values benchmark is a dataset designed to assess the alignment of large language models with traditional Chinese educational values. It includes a diverse set of tasks that cover various aspects of Chinese educational principles, such as reverence for teachers, emphasis on diligence and hard work, and the importance of moral cultivation.
The authors evaluated several well-known language models, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on the Edu-Values benchmark. The results provided insights into the models' understanding and alignment with Chinese educational values, highlighting areas where they perform well and areas where they may be lacking.
Critical Analysis
The Edu-Values benchmark represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI alignment, as it focuses on the culturally-specific context of Chinese education. By evaluating large language models on this benchmark, the researchers can identify areas where the models may be biased or misaligned with traditional Chinese educational values.
However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the benchmark, such as the representativeness of the tasks or the extent to which the benchmark captures the full breadth of Chinese educational values. Additionally, the paper does not explore potential challenges in developing language models that are truly aligned with culturally-specific educational perspectives.
Conclusion
The Edu-Values benchmark introduced in this paper represents an important step towards evaluating the Chinese educational values of large language models. By testing prominent models on this benchmark, the researchers have gained insights into the models' alignment with traditional Chinese educational principles, which can inform the development of future models that are more attuned to culturally-specific educational perspectives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Edu-Values: Towards Evaluating the Chinese Education Values of Large Language Models
Peiyi Zhang, Yazhou Zhang, Bo Wang, Lu Rong, Jing Qin
With the recent evolution of large language models (LLMs), concerns about aligning such models with human values have grown. Previous research has primarily focused on assessing LLMs' performance in terms of the Helpful, Honest, Harmless (3H) basic principles, while often overlooking their alignment with educational values in the Chinese context. To fill this gap, we present Edu-Values, the first Chinese education values evaluation benchmark designed to measure LLMs' alignment ability across seven dimensions: professional ideology, cultural literacy, educational knowledge and skills, education laws and regulations, teachers' professional ethics, basic competencies, and subject knowledge. We meticulously design and compile 1,418 questions, including multiple-choice, multi-modal question answering, subjective analysis, adversarial prompts, and questions on traditional Chinese culture. We conduct both human evaluation and automatic evaluation over 11 state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs, and highlight three main findings: (1) due to differences in educational culture, Chinese LLMs significantly outperform English LLMs, with Qwen 2 ranking the first with a score of 81.37; (2) LLMs perform well in subject knowledge and teaching skills but struggle with teachers' professional ethics and basic competencies; (3) LLMs excel at multiple-choice questions but perform poorly on subjective analysis and multi-modal tasks. This demonstrates the effectiveness and potential of the proposed benchmark. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/zhangpeii/Edu-Values.git.
Read more9/20/2024
0
CJEval: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models Using Chinese Junior High School Exam Data
Qian-Wen Zhang, Haochen Wang, Fang Li, Siyu An, Lingfeng Qiao, Liangcai Gao, Di Yin, Xing Sun
Online education platforms have significantly transformed the dissemination of educational resources by providing a dynamic and digital infrastructure. With the further enhancement of this transformation, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has elevated the intelligence levels of these platforms. However, current academic benchmarks provide limited guidance for real-world industry scenarios. This limitation arises because educational applications require more than mere test question responses. To bridge this gap, we introduce CJEval, a benchmark based on Chinese Junior High School Exam Evaluations. CJEval consists of 26,136 samples across four application-level educational tasks covering ten subjects. These samples include not only questions and answers but also detailed annotations such as question types, difficulty levels, knowledge concepts, and answer explanations. By utilizing this benchmark, we assessed LLMs' potential applications and conducted a comprehensive analysis of their performance by fine-tuning on various educational tasks. Extensive experiments and discussions have highlighted the opportunities and challenges of applying LLMs in the field of education.
Read more9/26/2024
0
CMoralEval: A Moral Evaluation Benchmark for Chinese Large Language Models
Linhao Yu, Yongqi Leng, Yufei Huang, Shang Wu, Haixin Liu, Xinmeng Ji, Jiahui Zhao, Jinwang Song, Tingting Cui, Xiaoqing Cheng, Tao Liu, Deyi Xiong
What a large language model (LLM) would respond in ethically relevant context? In this paper, we curate a large benchmark CMoralEval for morality evaluation of Chinese LLMs. The data sources of CMoralEval are two-fold: 1) a Chinese TV program discussing Chinese moral norms with stories from the society and 2) a collection of Chinese moral anomies from various newspapers and academic papers on morality. With these sources, we aim to create a moral evaluation dataset characterized by diversity and authenticity. We develop a morality taxonomy and a set of fundamental moral principles that are not only rooted in traditional Chinese culture but also consistent with contemporary societal norms. To facilitate efficient construction and annotation of instances in CMoralEval, we establish a platform with AI-assisted instance generation to streamline the annotation process. These help us curate CMoralEval that encompasses both explicit moral scenarios (14,964 instances) and moral dilemma scenarios (15,424 instances), each with instances from different data sources. We conduct extensive experiments with CMoralEval to examine a variety of Chinese LLMs. Experiment results demonstrate that CMoralEval is a challenging benchmark for Chinese LLMs. The dataset is publicly available at url{https://github.com/tjunlp-lab/CMoralEval}.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Measuring Taiwanese Mandarin Language Understanding
Po-Heng Chen, Sijia Cheng, Wei-Lin Chen, Yen-Ting Lin, Yun-Nung Chen
The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has drawn substantial attention in the field recently. This work focuses on evaluating LLMs in a Chinese context, specifically, for Traditional Chinese which has been largely underrepresented in existing benchmarks. We present TMLU, a holistic evaluation suit tailored for assessing the advanced knowledge and reasoning capability in LLMs, under the context of Taiwanese Mandarin. TMLU consists of an array of 37 subjects across social science, STEM, humanities, Taiwan-specific content, and others, ranging from middle school to professional levels. In addition, we curate chain-of-thought-like few-shot explanations for each subject to facilitate the evaluation of complex reasoning skills. To establish a comprehensive baseline, we conduct extensive experiments and analysis on 24 advanced LLMs. The results suggest that Chinese open-weight models demonstrate inferior performance comparing to multilingual proprietary ones, and open-weight models tailored for Taiwanese Mandarin lag behind the Simplified-Chinese counterparts. The findings indicate great headrooms for improvement, and emphasize the goal of TMLU to foster the development of localized Taiwanese-Mandarin LLMs. We release the benchmark and evaluation scripts for the community to promote future research.
Read more4/1/2024