CJEval: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models Using Chinese Junior High School Exam Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "CJEval: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models Using Chinese Junior High School Exam Data" presents a new benchmark for evaluating the performance of large language models on Chinese exam questions.
- The benchmark, called CJEval, is based on questions from the Chinese Junior High School Entrance Examination, a major nationwide exam.
- The paper aims to provide a standardized way to assess how well language models can handle the types of questions and skills tested in this important educational assessment.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers created a new benchmark called CJEval to test how well large language models can perform on the types of questions found on the Chinese Junior High School Entrance Examination. This is a major nationwide exam that Chinese students take to determine which junior high school they will attend.
The researchers collected a large dataset of actual exam questions from past tests and used this to create the CJEval benchmark. This allows them to see how capable language models are at answering the kinds of questions and demonstrating the skills that are important for success on this critical educational assessment.
By providing a standardized way to evaluate language models on this real-world educational task, the CJEval benchmark can help researchers and developers better understand the strengths and limitations of their models. This could lead to improved language models that are more effective at handling the types of natural language processing challenges found in educational settings.
Technical Explanation
The CJEval benchmark is built using a dataset of questions from past Chinese Junior High School Entrance Examinations. These exams test a range of skills including reading comprehension, mathematics reasoning, and scientific knowledge. The researchers collected a large corpus of over 30,000 actual exam questions, which they used to create the CJEval benchmark.
The benchmark is designed to assess how well large language models can perform on these educational tasks. Researchers can use CJEval to evaluate different language models by having them attempt to answer the exam questions and comparing their performance to human baselines. This provides a standardized way to assess language model capabilities in the context of an important real-world educational assessment.
The paper describes the process of constructing the CJEval dataset and outlines some initial benchmark results. The findings suggest that while current large language models show promising performance, there is still significant room for improvement to match human-level abilities on the types of reasoning and comprehension tasks found in the Chinese Junior High School Entrance Examination.
Critical Analysis
The CJEval benchmark represents a novel and valuable contribution to the field of language model evaluation. By focusing on a real-world educational assessment, the benchmark provides a more authentic and relevant test of language model capabilities compared to many synthetic or decontextualized evaluation tasks.
However, the paper does not extensively discuss the potential limitations or biases in the CJEval dataset or benchmark design. It would be helpful to understand how representative the exam questions are of the full scope of skills and knowledge tested on the Chinese Junior High School Entrance Examination, and whether there are any demographic or cultural biases inherent in the dataset.
Additionally, while the paper presents some initial benchmark results, it would be useful to see more in-depth analysis of language model performance, such as identifying specific question types or skills where models excel or struggle the most. This could provide more nuanced insights to guide future model development and improvement.
Conclusion
The CJEval benchmark introduced in this paper represents an important step towards more comprehensive and educationally-relevant evaluation of large language models. By assessing model performance on a standardized set of exam questions from the Chinese Junior High School Entrance Examination, CJEval provides a novel way to understand the real-world capabilities of these powerful AI systems.
The findings suggest that while language models show promise, there is still significant room for improvement to match human-level abilities on the types of reasoning and comprehension tasks found in this critical educational assessment. Continued research and development using benchmarks like CJEval can help advance language models to be more effective tools for educational applications and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CJEval: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models Using Chinese Junior High School Exam Data
Qian-Wen Zhang, Haochen Wang, Fang Li, Siyu An, Lingfeng Qiao, Liangcai Gao, Di Yin, Xing Sun
Online education platforms have significantly transformed the dissemination of educational resources by providing a dynamic and digital infrastructure. With the further enhancement of this transformation, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has elevated the intelligence levels of these platforms. However, current academic benchmarks provide limited guidance for real-world industry scenarios. This limitation arises because educational applications require more than mere test question responses. To bridge this gap, we introduce CJEval, a benchmark based on Chinese Junior High School Exam Evaluations. CJEval consists of 26,136 samples across four application-level educational tasks covering ten subjects. These samples include not only questions and answers but also detailed annotations such as question types, difficulty levels, knowledge concepts, and answer explanations. By utilizing this benchmark, we assessed LLMs' potential applications and conducted a comprehensive analysis of their performance by fine-tuning on various educational tasks. Extensive experiments and discussions have highlighted the opportunities and challenges of applying LLMs in the field of education.
Read more9/26/2024
0
Edu-Values: Towards Evaluating the Chinese Education Values of Large Language Models
Peiyi Zhang, Yazhou Zhang, Bo Wang, Lu Rong, Jing Qin
With the recent evolution of large language models (LLMs), concerns about aligning such models with human values have grown. Previous research has primarily focused on assessing LLMs' performance in terms of the Helpful, Honest, Harmless (3H) basic principles, while often overlooking their alignment with educational values in the Chinese context. To fill this gap, we present Edu-Values, the first Chinese education values evaluation benchmark designed to measure LLMs' alignment ability across seven dimensions: professional ideology, cultural literacy, educational knowledge and skills, education laws and regulations, teachers' professional ethics, basic competencies, and subject knowledge. We meticulously design and compile 1,418 questions, including multiple-choice, multi-modal question answering, subjective analysis, adversarial prompts, and questions on traditional Chinese culture. We conduct both human evaluation and automatic evaluation over 11 state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs, and highlight three main findings: (1) due to differences in educational culture, Chinese LLMs significantly outperform English LLMs, with Qwen 2 ranking the first with a score of 81.37; (2) LLMs perform well in subject knowledge and teaching skills but struggle with teachers' professional ethics and basic competencies; (3) LLMs excel at multiple-choice questions but perform poorly on subjective analysis and multi-modal tasks. This demonstrates the effectiveness and potential of the proposed benchmark. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/zhangpeii/Edu-Values.git.
Read more9/20/2024
💬
0
CodeJudge-Eval: Can Large Language Models be Good Judges in Code Understanding?
Yuwei Zhao, Ziyang Luo, Yuchen Tian, Hongzhan Lin, Weixiang Yan, Annan Li, Jing Ma
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive code generation capabilities, primarily evaluated through language-to-code benchmarks. However, these benchmarks may not fully capture a model's code understanding abilities. We introduce CodeJudge-Eval (CJ-Eval), a novel benchmark designed to assess LLMs' code understanding abilities from the perspective of code judging rather than code generation. CJ-Eval challenges models to determine the correctness of provided code solutions, encompassing various error types and compilation issues. By leveraging a diverse set of problems and a fine-grained judging system, CJ-Eval addresses the limitations of traditional benchmarks, including the potential memorization of solutions. Evaluation of 12 well-known LLMs on CJ-Eval reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle, highlighting the benchmark's ability to probe deeper into models' code understanding abilities. Our codes and benchmark are available at url{https://github.com/CodeLLM-Research/CodeJudge-Eval}.
Read more9/16/2024
💬
0
ChemEval: A Comprehensive Multi-Level Chemical Evaluation for Large Language Models
Yuqing Huang, Rongyang Zhang, Xuesong He, Xuyang Zhi, Hao Wang, Xin Li, Feiyang Xu, Deguang Liu, Huadong Liang, Yi Li, Jian Cui, Zimu Liu, Shijin Wang, Guoping Hu, Guiquan Liu, Qi Liu, Defu Lian, Enhong Chen
There is a growing interest in the role that LLMs play in chemistry which lead to an increased focus on the development of LLMs benchmarks tailored to chemical domains to assess the performance of LLMs across a spectrum of chemical tasks varying in type and complexity. However, existing benchmarks in this domain fail to adequately meet the specific requirements of chemical research professionals. To this end, we propose textbf{textit{ChemEval}}, which provides a comprehensive assessment of the capabilities of LLMs across a wide range of chemical domain tasks. Specifically, ChemEval identified 4 crucial progressive levels in chemistry, assessing 12 dimensions of LLMs across 42 distinct chemical tasks which are informed by open-source data and the data meticulously crafted by chemical experts, ensuring that the tasks have practical value and can effectively evaluate the capabilities of LLMs. In the experiment, we evaluate 12 mainstream LLMs on ChemEval under zero-shot and few-shot learning contexts, which included carefully selected demonstration examples and carefully designed prompts. The results show that while general LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude-3.5 excel in literature understanding and instruction following, they fall short in tasks demanding advanced chemical knowledge. Conversely, specialized LLMs exhibit enhanced chemical competencies, albeit with reduced literary comprehension. This suggests that LLMs have significant potential for enhancement when tackling sophisticated tasks in the field of chemistry. We believe our work will facilitate the exploration of their potential to drive progress in chemistry. Our benchmark and analysis will be available at {color{blue} url{https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/ChemEval}}.
Read more9/24/2024