Effect Size Estimation for Duration Recommendation in Online Experiments: Leveraging Hierarchical Models and Objective Utility Approaches

Overview

• This paper focuses on estimating the effect size for duration recommendation in online experiments.
• It leverages hierarchical models and objective utility approaches to improve the accuracy of effect size estimation.
• The goal is to provide more reliable recommendations for the optimal duration of online experiments.

Plain English Explanation

Online experiments, such as A/B tests, are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of changes to websites or apps. One important metric in these experiments is the

, or the length of time the experiment runs. Choosing the right duration is crucial, as it can impact the reliability and statistical power of the results.

The authors of this paper propose a new approach for estimating the effect size, which is a measure of the magnitude of the difference between the experimental conditions. By using

and , they aim to provide more accurate recommendations for the optimal duration of online experiments.

Hierarchical models take into account the nested structure of the data, where individual users are nested within different experimental conditions. This allows the model to better capture the variability within and between these conditions. Objective utility approaches, on the other hand, focus on maximizing the

of the experiment, which could be measured in terms of statistical power, revenue, or other relevant metrics.

By combining these two techniques, the authors hope to give researchers and practitioners more reliable guidance on how long to run their online experiments, ultimately leading to better-informed decisions and more robust findings.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach for estimating the effect size in online experiments, which is a crucial step in determining the optimal duration of the experiment. The authors leverage

and to improve the accuracy of the effect size estimation.

Hierarchical models are used to account for the nested structure of the data, where individual users are nested within different experimental conditions. This allows the model to better capture the variability within and between these conditions, leading to more precise estimates of the effect size.

The objective utility approach focuses on maximizing the

of the experiment, which could be measured in terms of statistical power, revenue, or other relevant metrics. By incorporating this objective function into the effect size estimation, the authors aim to provide recommendations that are aligned with the overall goals of the experiment.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through a series of simulations and real-world case studies. They show that their method outperforms traditional approaches, such as pooled t-tests or ANOVA, in terms of accurate effect size estimation and optimal duration recommendation.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations of their work, including the assumptions made about the underlying data-generating process and the reliance on the accuracy of the objective utility function. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impact of

or on the experimental results, which could be an important consideration in some online settings.

Further research could explore the robustness of the proposed approach to violations of these assumptions, as well as investigate the performance of the method under different types of experimental designs and objectives. Additionally, incorporating missing pieces how framing uncertainty impacts longitudinal or doubly robust inference causal latent factor models could potentially enhance the method's ability to handle more complex scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for estimating the effect size in online experiments, leveraging hierarchical models and objective utility approaches. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method in improving the accuracy of duration recommendations, which can have significant implications for the design and analysis of online experiments.

By providing more reliable guidance on experiment duration, the proposed technique can help researchers and practitioners make better-informed decisions, ultimately leading to more robust findings and more effective interventions. The authors' work contributes to the ongoing efforts to toward inference optimal mixture expert large language and ab testing under interference partial network information, further advancing the field of online experimentation and decision-making.