Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2409.14866 - Published 9/24/2024 by Xueluan Gong, Mingzhe Li, Yilin Zhang, Fengyuan Ran, Chen Chen, Yanjiao Chen, Qian Wang, Kwok-Yan Lam
Total Score

0

Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores techniques for evading and bypassing security measures in large language models (LLMs) through fuzz testing-driven jailbreaking attacks.
  • The researchers demonstrate how these attacks can be used to gain unauthorized access and control over LLMs, highlighting the importance of robust security measures in AI systems.
  • The key contributions include a novel fuzz testing framework, a comprehensive evaluation of jailbreaking attacks, and insights into the effectiveness and evasiveness of these attacks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on finding weaknesses in the security of large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. The researchers used a technique called "fuzz testing" to find ways to bypass the safeguards and restrictions that are put in place to prevent these models from being misused.

Fuzz testing involves feeding the LLM a large number of random or unexpected inputs, with the goal of finding vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to take control of the system. The researchers developed a specialized fuzz testing framework and used it to systematically explore different attack strategies.

Their work showed that it is possible to evade the security measures of LLMs and gain unauthorized access, allowing the attacker to make the model generate harmful or inappropriate content. This highlights the importance of ensuring that these powerful AI systems have robust security measures in place to prevent misuse.

The paper provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and evasiveness of these jailbreaking attacks, which can help AI researchers and developers to improve the security of LLMs and other AI systems. By understanding the weaknesses that can be exploited, they can work to strengthen the defenses and make it much harder for attackers to bypass the safeguards.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a novel fuzz testing framework, called GPTFuzzer, to systematically explore jailbreaking attacks against large language models (LLMs). This framework generates a diverse set of inputs and evaluates the model's responses, with the goal of identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

Through their experiments, the researchers demonstrated the effectiveness and evasiveness of these fuzz testing-driven jailbreaking attacks. They were able to bypass various security measures, including content filters, safety systems, and output constraints, and gain unauthorized control over the LLMs.

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of different attack strategies, including prompt engineering, adversarial input generation, and model fine-tuning. The researchers also explored the effectiveness of defense mechanisms and their ability to mitigate these attacks.

The key insights from the paper highlight the need for robust security measures in LLMs and other AI systems. The researchers emphasize the importance of proactive security practices, such as comprehensive testing and monitoring, to identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study of jailbreaking attacks against large language models, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One key limitation is that the researchers focused primarily on a specific set of LLMs and security measures, and the effectiveness of the attacks may vary across different models and implementations. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical considerations and potential societal impact of these types of attacks, which could be an important area for further exploration.

Another area for further research is the development of more advanced defense mechanisms that can effectively mitigate the evasive and adaptive nature of the fuzz testing-driven jailbreaking attacks. The researchers suggest that a combination of techniques, such as robust content filtering, output monitoring, and anomaly detection, may be necessary to provide comprehensive protection.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of jailbreaking attacks against LLMs, but there is still much work to be done to ensure the security and trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive study of fuzz testing-driven jailbreaking attacks against large language models (LLMs), highlighting the importance of robust security measures in AI systems. The researchers developed a novel fuzz testing framework and demonstrated the effectiveness and evasiveness of these attacks, which can bypass various security safeguards and grant unauthorized control over the LLMs.

The insights from this work underline the critical need for proactive security practices, such as comprehensive testing and monitoring, to identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. As LLMs continue to grow in capabilities and influence, ensuring their security and trustworthiness will be of paramount importance for their responsible development and deployment in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs
Total Score

0

Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs

Xueluan Gong, Mingzhe Li, Yilin Zhang, Fengyuan Ran, Chen Chen, Yanjiao Chen, Qian Wang, Kwok-Yan Lam

Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled in various tasks but are still vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, where attackers create jailbreak prompts to mislead the model to produce harmful or offensive content. Current jailbreak methods either rely heavily on manually crafted templates, which pose challenges in scalability and adaptability, or struggle to generate semantically coherent prompts, making them easy to detect. Additionally, most existing approaches involve lengthy prompts, leading to higher query costs.In this paper, to remedy these challenges, we introduce a novel jailbreaking attack framework, which is an automated, black-box jailbreaking attack framework that adapts the black-box fuzz testing approach with a series of customized designs. Instead of relying on manually crafted templates, our method starts with an empty seed pool, removing the need to search for any related jailbreaking templates. We also develop three novel question-dependent mutation strategies using an LLM helper to generate prompts that maintain semantic coherence while significantly reducing their length. Additionally, we implement a two-level judge module to accurately detect genuine successful jailbreaks. We evaluated our method on 7 representative LLMs and compared it with 5 state-of-the-art jailbreaking attack strategies. For proprietary LLM APIs, such as GPT-3.5 turbo, GPT-4, and Gemini-Pro, our method achieves attack success rates of over 90%, 80%, and 74%, respectively, exceeding existing baselines by more than 60%. Additionally, our method can maintain high semantic coherence while significantly reducing the length of jailbreak prompts. When targeting GPT-4, our method can achieve over 78% attack success rate even with 100 tokens. Moreover, our method demonstrates transferability and is robust to state-of-the-art defenses. We will open-source our codes upon publication.

Read more

9/24/2024

GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts
Total Score

0

GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts

Jiahao Yu, Xingwei Lin, Zheng Yu, Xinyu Xing

Large language models (LLMs) have recently experienced tremendous popularity and are widely used from casual conversations to AI-driven programming. However, despite their considerable success, LLMs are not entirely reliable and can give detailed guidance on how to conduct harmful or illegal activities. While safety measures can reduce the risk of such outputs, adversarial jailbreak attacks can still exploit LLMs to produce harmful content. These jailbreak templates are typically manually crafted, making large-scale testing challenging. In this paper, we introduce GPTFuzz, a novel black-box jailbreak fuzzing framework inspired by the AFL fuzzing framework. Instead of manual engineering, GPTFuzz automates the generation of jailbreak templates for red-teaming LLMs. At its core, GPTFuzz starts with human-written templates as initial seeds, then mutates them to produce new templates. We detail three key components of GPTFuzz: a seed selection strategy for balancing efficiency and variability, mutate operators for creating semantically equivalent or similar sentences, and a judgment model to assess the success of a jailbreak attack. We evaluate GPTFuzz against various commercial and open-source LLMs, including ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Vicuna, under diverse attack scenarios. Our results indicate that GPTFuzz consistently produces jailbreak templates with a high success rate, surpassing human-crafted templates. Remarkably, GPTFuzz achieves over 90% attack success rates against ChatGPT and Llama-2 models, even with suboptimal initial seed templates. We anticipate that GPTFuzz will be instrumental for researchers and practitioners in examining LLM robustness and will encourage further exploration into enhancing LLM safety.

Read more

6/28/2024

A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Study of Jailbreak Attack versus Defense for Large Language Models

Zihao Xu, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Stjepan Picek

Large Language Models (LLMS) have increasingly become central to generating content with potential societal impacts. Notably, these models have demonstrated capabilities for generating content that could be deemed harmful. To mitigate these risks, researchers have adopted safety training techniques to align model outputs with societal values to curb the generation of malicious content. However, the phenomenon of jailbreaking, where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models, persists as a significant challenge. This research conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on jailbreaking LLMs and their defense techniques. We meticulously investigate nine attack techniques and seven defense techniques applied across three distinct language models: Vicuna, LLama, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of these attack and defense techniques. Our findings reveal that existing white-box attacks underperform compared to universal techniques and that including special tokens in the input significantly affects the likelihood of successful attacks. This research highlights the need to concentrate on the security facets of LLMs. Additionally, we contribute to the field by releasing our datasets and testing framework, aiming to foster further research into LLM security. We believe these contributions will facilitate the exploration of security measures within this domain.

Read more

5/20/2024

Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
Total Score

0

Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey

Sibo Yi, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Tianshuo Cong, Xinlei He, Jiaxing Song, Ke Xu, Qi Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks, including question answering, translation, code completion, etc. However, the over-assistance of LLMs has raised the challenge of jailbreaking, which induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society by designing adversarial prompts. With the emergence of jailbreak attack methods exploiting different vulnerabilities in LLMs, the corresponding safety alignment measures are also evolving. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods. For instance, the attack methods are divided into black-box and white-box attacks based on the transparency of the target model. Meanwhile, we classify defense methods into prompt-level and model-level defenses. Additionally, we further subdivide these attack and defense methods into distinct sub-classes and present a coherent diagram illustrating their relationships. We also conduct an investigation into the current evaluation methods and compare them from different perspectives. Our findings aim to inspire future research and practical implementations in safeguarding LLMs against adversarial attacks. Above all, although jailbreak remains a significant concern within the community, we believe that our work enhances the understanding of this domain and provides a foundation for developing more secure LLMs.

Read more

9/2/2024