Efficient Data Generation for Source-grounded Information-seeking Dialogs: A Use Case for Meeting Transcripts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Efficient generation of data for source-grounded information-seeking dialogs
- Use case focuses on meeting transcripts
- Aims to create synthetic dialogs that mimic real-world information-seeking conversations
Plain English Explanation
This research paper explores an efficient way to generate data for information-seeking dialogs that are grounded in source material, such as meeting transcripts. The goal is to create synthetic dialogs that closely resemble real-world conversations where people seek information from available sources.
By developing an efficient data generation process, the researchers hope to expand the amount of training data available for dialog systems that can engage in source-grounded information-seeking dialogs. This could lead to more natural and effective conversational AI in areas like customer service or healthcare.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a two-stage approach for efficiently generating source-grounded information-seeking dialogs:
-
Retrieval Stage: Given a set of source documents (e.g., meeting transcripts), the system retrieves relevant passages that could be the basis for information-seeking queries.
-
Generation Stage: Using the retrieved passages as input, the system generates synthetic dialog responses that mimic how a person might seek information based on the available sources.
The key innovations include:
- Retrieval Model: A neural network model that can effectively identify relevant passages from the source documents.
- Dialog Generation Model: A language model that can generate natural-sounding dialog responses conditioned on the retrieved passages.
- Data Augmentation: Techniques to expand the training data by introducing controlled variations in the generated dialogs.
Through extensive experiments on meeting transcript data, the researchers demonstrate that their approach can generate high-quality synthetic dialogs that closely match real-world information-seeking conversations.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed approach to the challenging problem of generating source-grounded information-seeking dialog data efficiently. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:
- Domain Specificity: The focus on meeting transcripts raises questions about the generalizability of the approach to other domains. Further testing on diverse source materials would be valuable.
- Evaluation Metrics: While the paper includes detailed quantitative and qualitative evaluations, there may be room for more comprehensive assessment of the generated dialogs' realism and usefulness for downstream applications.
- Human Evaluation: Incorporating more extensive human evaluation could provide additional insights into the naturalness and coherence of the synthetic dialogs.
- Ethical Considerations: As with any data generation technique, there may be ethical concerns around bias, privacy, and the potential misuse of the generated data that should be carefully addressed.
Conclusion
This research presents a promising approach for efficiently generating high-quality, source-grounded information-seeking dialog data. By leveraging retrieval and dialog generation models, the researchers demonstrate the ability to create synthetic conversations that closely resemble real-world interactions. The potential applications of this work include enhancing the training of conversational AI systems and expanding the available data for information-seeking dialog research. As the field of dialog systems continues to evolve, techniques like those presented in this paper could play a vital role in driving progress and improving the natural language interaction capabilities of AI assistants.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Efficient Data Generation for Source-grounded Information-seeking Dialogs: A Use Case for Meeting Transcripts
Lotem Golany, Filippo Galgani, Maya Mamo, Nimrod Parasol, Omer Vandsburger, Nadav Bar, Ido Dagan
Automating data generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) has become increasingly popular. In this work, we investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of LLM-based data generation in the challenging setting of source-grounded information-seeking dialogs, with response attribution, over long documents. Our source texts consist of long and noisy meeting transcripts, adding to the task complexity. Since automating attribution remains difficult, we propose a semi-automatic approach: dialog queries and responses are generated with LLMs, followed by human verification and identification of attribution spans. Using this approach, we created MISeD -- Meeting Information Seeking Dialogs dataset -- a dataset of information-seeking dialogs focused on meeting transcripts. Models finetuned with MISeD demonstrate superior performance compared to off-the-shelf models, even those of larger size. Finetuning on MISeD gives comparable response generation quality to finetuning on fully manual data, while improving attribution quality and reducing time and effort.
Read more6/24/2024
0
LUCID: LLM-Generated Utterances for Complex and Interesting Dialogues
Joe Stacey, Jianpeng Cheng, John Torr, Tristan Guigue, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Anders Johannsen
Spurred by recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), virtual assistants are poised to take a leap forward in terms of their dialogue capabilities. Yet a major bottleneck to achieving genuinely transformative task-oriented dialogue capabilities remains the scarcity of high quality data. Existing datasets, while impressive in scale, have limited domain coverage and contain few genuinely challenging conversational phenomena; those which are present are typically unlabelled, making it difficult to assess the strengths and weaknesses of models without time-consuming and costly human evaluation. Moreover, creating high quality dialogue data has until now required considerable human input, limiting both the scale of these datasets and the ability to rapidly bootstrap data for a new target domain. We aim to overcome these issues with LUCID, a modularised and highly automated LLM-driven data generation system that produces realistic, diverse and challenging dialogues. We use LUCID to generate a seed dataset of 4,277 conversations across 100 intents to demonstrate its capabilities, with a human review finding consistently high quality labels in the generated data.
Read more5/6/2024
📉
0
Towards Faithful and Robust LLM Specialists for Evidence-Based Question-Answering
Tobias Schimanski, Jingwei Ni, Mathias Kraus, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold
Advances towards more faithful and traceable answers of Large Language Models (LLMs) are crucial for various research and practical endeavors. One avenue in reaching this goal is basing the answers on reliable sources. However, this Evidence-Based QA has proven to work insufficiently with LLMs in terms of citing the correct sources (source quality) and truthfully representing the information within sources (answer attributability). In this work, we systematically investigate how to robustly fine-tune LLMs for better source quality and answer attributability. Specifically, we introduce a data generation pipeline with automated data quality filters, which can synthesize diversified high-quality training and testing data at scale. We further introduce four test sets to benchmark the robustness of fine-tuned specialist models. Extensive evaluation shows that fine-tuning on synthetic data improves performance on both in- and out-of-distribution. Furthermore, we show that data quality, which can be drastically improved by proposed quality filters, matters more than quantity in improving Evidence-Based QA.
Read more6/4/2024
🤔
0
Investigating Low-Cost LLM Annotation for~Spoken Dialogue Understanding Datasets
Lucas Druart (LIA), Valentin Vielzeuf (LIA), Yannick Est`eve (LIA)
In spoken Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems, the choice of the semantic representation describing the users' requests is key to a smooth interaction. Indeed, the system uses this representation to reason over a database and its domain knowledge to choose its next action. The dialogue course thus depends on the information provided by this semantic representation. While textual datasets provide fine-grained semantic representations, spoken dialogue datasets fall behind. This paper provides insights into automatic enhancement of spoken dialogue datasets' semantic representations. Our contributions are three fold: (1) assess the relevance of Large Language Model fine-tuning, (2) evaluate the knowledge captured by the produced annotations and (3) highlight semi-automatic annotation implications.
Read more6/21/2024