On Efficiently Representing Regular Languages as RNNs
2402.15814
0
0
🤯
Abstract
Recent work by Hewitt et al. (2020) provides an interpretation of the empirical success of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) as language models (LMs). It shows that RNNs can efficiently represent bounded hierarchical structures that are prevalent in human language. This suggests that RNNs' success might be linked to their ability to model hierarchy. However, a closer inspection of Hewitt et al.'s (2020) construction shows that it is not inherently limited to hierarchical structures. This poses a natural question: What other classes of LMs can RNNs efficiently represent? To this end, we generalize Hewitt et al.'s (2020) construction and show that RNNs can efficiently represent a larger class of LMs than previously claimed -- specifically, those that can be represented by a pushdown automaton with a bounded stack and a specific stack update function. Altogether, the efficiency of representing this diverse class of LMs with RNN LMs suggests novel interpretations of their inductive bias.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper by Hewitt et al. (2020) offers an interpretation of why recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are successful as language models (LMs).
- It suggests that RNNs can efficiently represent bounded hierarchical structures common in human language, which may explain their success.
- However, the construction used in the paper is not inherently limited to hierarchical structures, raising the question of what other classes of LMs RNNs can efficiently represent.
Plain English Explanation
The paper by Hewitt et al. (2020) tries to understand why recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have been so successful at modeling human language. The researchers suggest that RNNs can efficiently represent the bounded hierarchical structures that are common in natural language, and this may be the key to their success as language models (LMs).
However, a closer look at the specific construction used in the paper shows that it is not inherently limited to just hierarchical structures. This leads to the natural question: What other types of language models can RNNs efficiently represent, beyond just hierarchical ones? The paper aims to explore this question further.
Technical Explanation
The paper by Hewitt et al. (2020) provides a novel interpretation of why recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are effective at modeling language. The researchers show that RNNs can efficiently represent bounded hierarchical structures, which are prevalent in human language. This suggests that RNNs' success as language models (LMs) may be linked to their ability to capture these hierarchical patterns.
However, a closer inspection of the construction used in the paper reveals that it is not inherently limited to just hierarchical structures. This raises the question: What other classes of language models can RNNs efficiently represent, beyond just those with hierarchical structure?
To address this, the researchers generalize the construction from the previous work. They show that RNNs can efficiently represent a larger class of language models - specifically, those that can be represented by a pushdown automaton with a bounded stack and a specific stack update function. This suggests that RNNs have a broader inductive bias than previously thought, allowing them to model a more diverse set of language patterns.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes an important contribution by expanding our understanding of the representational capacity of RNNs as language models. By generalizing the previous construction, the researchers show that RNNs can efficiently represent a broader class of language models than just those with hierarchical structure.
However, the paper does not explore the full implications of this finding. It would be valuable to understand how this broader representational capacity of RNNs relates to their performance on different language tasks, and whether there are specific types of languages or linguistic structures that RNNs excel at modeling as a result of this inductive bias.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the research. It would be helpful to understand the assumptions or constraints of the analysis, and whether there are any cases where the efficient representational capacity of RNNs might not hold.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable step forward in interpreting the success of RNNs as language models, but there is still much to be explored in terms of the practical implications and potential limitations of these findings.
Conclusion
This paper by Hewitt et al. (2020) offers a novel interpretation of the empirical success of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) as language models (LMs). By showing that RNNs can efficiently represent a broader class of language models than just those with hierarchical structure, the researchers provide new insights into the inductive biases and representational capacity of these models.
These findings have significant implications for our understanding of language modeling and the strengths and limitations of RNNs as a modeling approach. They suggest that RNNs may be well-suited to capturing a diverse range of linguistic patterns, beyond just hierarchical structures, which could inform the development of more effective language models in the future.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to interpret the success of RNNs and other neural language models, and to better understand the relationships between model architecture, inductive biases, and language processing capabilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Lower Bounds on the Expressivity of Recurrent Neural Language Models
Anej Svete, Franz Nowak, Anisha Mohamed Sahabdeen, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
The recent successes and spread of large neural language models (LMs) call for a thorough understanding of their computational ability. Describing their computational abilities through LMs' emph{representational capacity} is a lively area of research. However, investigation into the representational capacity of neural LMs has predominantly focused on their ability to emph{recognize} formal languages. For example, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with Heaviside activations are tightly linked to regular languages, i.e., languages defined by finite-state automata (FSAs). Such results, however, fall short of describing the capabilities of RNN emph{language models} (LMs), which are definitionally emph{distributions} over strings. We take a fresh look at the representational capacity of RNN LMs by connecting them to emph{probabilistic} FSAs and demonstrate that RNN LMs with linearly bounded precision can express arbitrary regular LMs.
6/19/2024
🧠
On the Representational Capacity of Recurrent Neural Language Models
Franz Nowak, Anej Svete, Li Du, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
This work investigates the computational expressivity of language models (LMs) based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Siegelmann and Sontag (1992) famously showed that RNNs with rational weights and hidden states and unbounded computation time are Turing complete. However, LMs define weightings over strings in addition to just (unweighted) language membership and the analysis of the computational power of RNN LMs (RLMs) should reflect this. We extend the Turing completeness result to the probabilistic case, showing how a rationally weighted RLM with unbounded computation time can simulate any deterministic probabilistic Turing machine (PTM) with rationally weighted transitions. Since, in practice, RLMs work in real-time, processing a symbol at every time step, we treat the above result as an upper bound on the expressivity of RLMs. We also provide a lower bound by showing that under the restriction to real-time computation, such models can simulate deterministic real-time rational PTMs.
5/31/2024
💬
Advancing Regular Language Reasoning in Linear Recurrent Neural Networks
Ting-Han Fan, Ta-Chung Chi, Alexander I. Rudnicky
0
0
In recent studies, linear recurrent neural networks (LRNNs) have achieved Transformer-level performance in natural language and long-range modeling, while offering rapid parallel training and constant inference cost. With the resurgence of interest in LRNNs, we study whether they can learn the hidden rules in training sequences, such as the grammatical structures of regular language. We theoretically analyze some existing LRNNs and discover their limitations in modeling regular language. Motivated by this analysis, we propose a new LRNN equipped with a block-diagonal and input-dependent transition matrix. Experiments suggest that the proposed model is the only LRNN capable of performing length extrapolation on regular language tasks such as Sum, Even Pair, and Modular Arithmetic. The code is released at url{https://github.com/tinghanf/RegluarLRNN}.
4/10/2024
What Languages are Easy to Language-Model? A Perspective from Learning Probabilistic Regular Languages
Nadav Borenstein, Anej Svete, Robin Chan, Josef Valvoda, Franz Nowak, Isabelle Augenstein, Eleanor Chodroff, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
What can large language models learn? By definition, language models (LM) are distributions over strings. Therefore, an intuitive way of addressing the above question is to formalize it as a matter of learnability of classes of distributions over strings. While prior work in this direction focused on assessing the theoretical limits, in contrast, we seek to understand the empirical learnability. Unlike prior empirical work, we evaluate neural LMs on their home turf-learning probabilistic languages-rather than as classifiers of formal languages. In particular, we investigate the learnability of regular LMs (RLMs) by RNN and Transformer LMs. We empirically test the learnability of RLMs as a function of various complexity parameters of the RLM and the hidden state size of the neural LM. We find that the RLM rank, which corresponds to the size of linear space spanned by the logits of its conditional distributions, and the expected length of sampled strings are strong and significant predictors of learnability for both RNNs and Transformers. Several other predictors also reach significance, but with differing patterns between RNNs and Transformers.
6/12/2024