Elements Of Legislation For Artificial Intelligence Systems
0
🛠️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Regulatory and legal environment is a key part of the operational context for autonomous company management systems
- Presenting local regulations in two versions - one for people and one for autonomous systems - can create a well-defined operational context for AI
- Local regulations that enable collaboration between humans and AI can form the basis for relevant legislation governing autonomous systems
Plain English Explanation
The regulatory and legal environment that companies operate in is a crucial part of the context for autonomous management systems. To create a clear operational context for AI, local regulations could be presented in two different versions - one designed for humans to understand, and another tailored for autonomous systems. This would give the AI a well-defined set of rules and guidelines to work within, ensuring it can perform its functions correctly.
The laws and regulations that enable humans and AI to work together effectively could then form the foundation for new legislation governing the development and deployment of autonomous systems. This would help ensure robust governance and efficient policy analysis as AI becomes more prevalent in business operations.
Technical Explanation
The paper discusses the importance of the regulatory and legal context for autonomous company management systems. It proposes that local regulations be presented in two parallel versions - one for human use and one for autonomous AI systems. This would provide the AI with a clear, well-defined operational environment that allows it to function within the required standards and guidelines.
The authors suggest that the regulations enabling collaboration between individuals and autonomous AI could form the basis for new legislation governing the development and implementation of these autonomous systems. This would help establish clear lines of authority and accountability as AI takes on more decision-making responsibilities in business operations.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the need to consider the regulatory environment when deploying autonomous systems in corporate settings. Providing AI with a tailored set of rules and guidelines, derived from existing human-centric regulations, is a pragmatic approach to ensuring these systems operate within legal and ethical bounds.
However, the paper does not address potential issues around how to maintain transparency and human oversight as autonomous systems become more sophisticated and integrated into core business functions. Careful consideration will be needed to balance the efficiency gains of AI-driven management with the need for human accountability and control.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of the regulatory and legal context in shaping the operational environment for autonomous company management systems. By presenting local regulations in dual versions - one for humans and one for AI - organizations can create a well-defined framework that allows autonomous systems to function effectively while still operating within the required standards and guidelines.
Incorporating these regulatory considerations into the development of new autonomous systems could also inform the creation of relevant legislation, helping to ensure a robust governance structure as AI becomes more prevalent in the business world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
0
Elements Of Legislation For Artificial Intelligence Systems
Anna Romanova
The significant part of the operational context for autonomous company management systems is the regulatory and legal environment in which corporations operate. In order to create a dedicated operational context for autonomous artificial intelligence systems, the wording of local regulatory documents can be simultaneously presented in two versions: for use by people and for use by autonomous systems. In this case, the artificial intelligence system will get a well-defined operational context that allows such a system to perform functions within the required standards. Local regulations that provide basis for the joint work of individuals and autonomous artificial intelligence systems can form the grounds for the relevant legislation governing the development and implementation of autonomous systems.
Read more7/16/2024
🏋️
2
The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview
Nuno Sousa e Silva
This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act. It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. A definition of key concepts follows, and then the material and territorial scope, as well as the timing of application, are analyzed. Although the Regulation does not explicitly set out principles, the main ideas of fairness, accountability, transparency, and equity in AI underly a set of rules of the regulation. This is discussed before looking at the ill-defined set of forbidden AI practices (manipulation and e exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, biometric identification and classification, and predictive policing). It is highlighted that those rules deal with behaviors rather than AI systems. The qualification and regulation of high-risk AI systems are tackled, alongside the obligation of transparency for certain systems, the regulation of general-purpose models, and the rules on certification, supervision, and sanctions. The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose of promoting responsible innovation within the European Union and beyond its borders.
Read more9/4/2024
👀
0
Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence and Technical Standardisation
Marion Ho-Dac (UA, CDEP), Baptiste Martinez (UA, CDEP)
The adoption of human oversight measures makes it possible to regulate, to varying degrees and in different ways, the decision-making process of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, for example by placing a human being in charge of supervising the system and, upstream, by developing the AI system to enable such supervision. Within the global governance of AI, the requirement for human oversight is embodied in several regulatory formats, within a diversity of normative sources. On the one hand, it reinforces the accountability of AI systems' users (for example, by requiring them to carry out certain checks) and, on the other hand, it better protects the individuals affected by the AI-based decision (for example, by allowing them to request a review of the decision). In the European context, the AI Act imposes obligations on providers of high-risk AI systems (and to some extent also on professional users of these systems, known as deployers), including the introduction of human oversight tools throughout the life cycle of AI systems, including by design (and their implementation by deployers). The EU legislator is therefore going much further than in the past in spelling out the legal requirement for human oversight. But it does not intend to provide for all implementation details; it calls on standardisation to technically flesh out this requirement (and more broadly all the requirements of section 2 of chapter III) on the basis of article 40 of the AI Act. In this multi-level regulatory context, the question of the place of humans in the AI decision-making process should be given particular attention. Indeed, depending on whether it is the law or the technical standard that sets the contours of human oversight, the regulatory governance of AI is not the same: its nature, content and scope are different. This analysis is at the heart of the contribution made (or to be made) by legal experts to the central reflection on the most appropriate regulatory governance -- in terms of both its institutional format and its substance -- to ensure the effectiveness of human oversight and AI trustworthiness.
Read more7/26/2024
🔮
0
Development of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Systems for Corporate Management
Anna Romanova
The article discusses development of autonomous artificial intelligence systems for corporate management. The function of a corporate director is still one of the few that are legislated for execution by a natural rather than an artificial person. The main prerequisites for development of systems for full automation of management decisions made at the level of a board of directors are formed in the field of corporate law, machine learning, and compliance with the rules of non-discrimination, transparency, and accountability of decisions made and algorithms applied. The basic methodological approaches in terms of corporate law for the autonomous director have already been developed and do not get rejection among representatives of the legal sciences. However, there is an undeniable need for further extensive research in order to amend corporate law to effectively introduce autonomous directors. In practice, there are two main options of management decisions automation at the level of top management and a board of directors: digital command centers or automation of separate functions. Artificial intelligence systems will be subject to the same strict requirements for non-discrimination, transparency, and accountability as natural directors. At a certain stage, autonomous systems can be an effective tool for countries, regions, and companies with a shortage of human capital, equalizing or providing additional chances for such countries and companies to compete on the global market.
Read more7/26/2024