Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), in automating the analysis of policy documents like legislation, regulations, and executive orders.
- The research focuses on AI's performance in tasks like question answering and content extraction from complex policy documents, using Executive Order 14110 on AI development and use as a case study.
- Four commercial AI systems were evaluated and compared to manual analysis by human experts to assess the strengths and limitations of current AI approaches in supporting policy analysis.
Plain English Explanation
Policy documents, such as laws and executive orders, play a crucial role in shaping society. However, these documents can be lengthy and complex, making them challenging and time-consuming to interpret and apply. This is where AI can potentially help.
Large language models, a type of AI system, have the ability to analyze and extract information from these policy documents more efficiently than humans. The researchers in this study wanted to evaluate how well AI systems perform at tasks like answering questions and finding key details in a complex executive order on the development and use of AI.
The researchers used four different commercial AI systems to analyze Executive Order 14110 and then compared their performance to the analysis done by human experts. They found that two of the AI systems, Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus, were able to provide accurate and reliable information from the document, performing on par with the human analysts but much more efficiently.
However, the researchers also noted that ensuring consistently accurate and reproducible results from AI systems remains a challenge, and further research and development is needed.
Technical Explanation
The study used a case study approach, analyzing Executive Order 14110 on the safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of AI as a test case. Four commercial AI systems were evaluated: Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3 Opus, GPT-3 Davinci, and GPT-3 Curie.
The researchers designed a set of representative policy questions and asked the AI systems to provide answers based on the content of the executive order. The performance of the AI systems was then compared to a manual analysis conducted by human experts.
The results showed that Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus demonstrated significant potential for supporting policy analysis. These two AI systems were able to provide accurate and reliable information extraction from the complex policy document, performing comparably to the human analysts in terms of the quality of the responses.
However, the study also highlighted the challenge of ensuring reproducible results from AI systems. The researchers noted that further research and development is needed to address this issue and improve the consistency of AI-driven policy analysis.
Critical Analysis
The study provides promising insights into the potential of AI, particularly large language models, in streamlining the analysis of complex policy documents. The strong performance of Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus suggests that AI can be effectively leveraged to support policy analysis, potentially improving accuracy and efficiency.
However, the researchers acknowledge the need for further research to address the challenge of reproducibility. Ensuring consistent and reliable results from AI systems is crucial for their wider adoption in policy analysis and decision-making processes.
Additionally, the study focused on a single executive order, and it would be valuable to expand the research to a broader range of policy documents, such as legislation and regulations, to assess the generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the potential of AI, specifically large language models, in automating the analysis of complex policy documents. The strong performance of two AI systems, Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus, suggests that AI can be effectively leveraged to support policy analysis, potentially improving accuracy and efficiency.
However, the study also highlights the need for further research to address the challenge of ensuring reproducible results from AI systems. Consistent and reliable performance is crucial for the wider adoption of AI in policy analysis and decision-making processes.
Overall, this research offers promising insights into the role of AI in policy analysis and sets the stage for further exploration of the opportunities and limitations of this technology in shaping legal and regulatory frameworks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110
Mark A. Kramer, Allen Leavens, Alexander Scarlat
Policy documents, such as legislation, regulations, and executive orders, are crucial in shaping society. However, their length and complexity make interpretation and application challenging and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), has the potential to automate the process of analyzing these documents, improving accuracy and efficiency. This study aims to evaluate the potential of AI in streamlining policy analysis and to identify the strengths and limitations of current AI approaches. The research focuses on question answering and tasks involving content extraction from policy documents. A case study was conducted using Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence as a test case. Four commercial AI systems were used to analyze the document and answer a set of representative policy questions. The performance of the AI systems was compared to manual analysis conducted by human experts. The study found that two AI systems, Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3 Opus, demonstrated significant potential for supporting policy analysis, providing accurate and reliable information extraction from complex documents. They performed comparably to human analysts but with significantly higher efficiency. However, achieving reproducibility remains a challenge, necessitating further research and development.
Read more6/12/2024
🤖
0
Assessing the State of AI Policy
Joanna F. DeFranco, Luke Biersmith
The deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) applications has accelerated rapidly. AI enabled technologies are facing the public in many ways including infrastructure, consumer products and home applications. Because many of these technologies present risks either in the form of physical injury, or bias, potentially yielding unfair outcomes, policy makers must consider the need for oversight. Most policymakers, however, lack the technical knowledge to judge whether an emerging AI technology is safe, effective, and requires oversight, therefore policy makers must depend on expert opinion. But policymakers are better served when, in addition to expert opinion, they have some general understanding of existing guidelines and regulations. This work provides an overview [the landscape] of AI legislation and directives at the international, U.S. state, city and federal levels. It also reviews relevant business standards, and technical society initiatives. Then an overlap and gap analysis are performed resulting in a reference guide that includes recommendations and guidance for future policy making.
Read more8/1/2024
🔍
0
AI-Driven Statutory Reasoning via Software Engineering Methods
Rohan Padhye
The recent proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as pre-trained large language models (LLMs) has opened up new frontiers in computational law. An exciting area of development is the use of AI to automate the deductive rule-based reasoning inherent in statutory and contract law. This paper argues that such automated deductive legal reasoning can now be viewed from the lens of software engineering, treating LLMs as interpreters of natural-language programs with natural-language inputs. We show how it is possible to apply principled software engineering techniques to enhance AI-driven legal reasoning of complex statutes and to unlock new applications in automated meta-reasoning such as mutation-guided example generation and metamorphic property-based testing.
Read more7/1/2024
🤖
0
Operationalizing the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Recommendations for Practitioners, Researchers, and Policy Makers
Alex Oesterling, Usha Bhalla, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Himabindu Lakkaraju
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly employed in diverse real-world applications, there has been significant interest in regulating these tools. To this end, several regulatory frameworks have been introduced by different countries worldwide. For example, the European Union recently passed the AI Act, the White House issued an Executive Order on safe, secure, and trustworthy AI, and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy issued the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights (AI BoR). Many of these frameworks emphasize the need for auditing and improving the trustworthiness of AI tools, underscoring the importance of safety, privacy, explainability, fairness, and human fallback options. Although these regulatory frameworks highlight the necessity of enforcement, practitioners often lack detailed guidance on implementing them. Furthermore, the extensive research on operationalizing each of these aspects is frequently buried in technical papers that are difficult for practitioners to parse. In this write-up, we address this shortcoming by providing an accessible overview of existing literature related to operationalizing regulatory principles. We provide easy-to-understand summaries of state-of-the-art literature and highlight various gaps that exist between regulatory guidelines and existing AI research, including the trade-offs that emerge during operationalization. We hope that this work not only serves as a starting point for practitioners interested in learning more about operationalizing the regulatory guidelines outlined in the Blueprint for an AI BoR but also provides researchers with a list of critical open problems and gaps between regulations and state-of-the-art AI research. Finally, we note that this is a working paper and we invite feedback in line with the purpose of this document as described in the introduction.
Read more7/12/2024