Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization

Read original: arXiv:2404.08154 - Published 9/17/2024 by Runqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Tongliang Liu
Total Score

0

Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new technique called "Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization" (AAER) to address the problem of catastrophic overfitting in machine learning models.
  • Catastrophic overfitting occurs when a model performs well on the training data but fails to generalize to new, unseen data, leading to poor performance.
  • The AAER method aims to regularize the model by generating and incorporating "abnormal" adversarial examples during training, which can help the model learn more robust representations and improve its generalization ability.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models can sometimes become too specialized to the data they are trained on, a problem known as "catastrophic overfitting." This means the model performs well on the training data but fails to work well on new, unfamiliar data. The Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization paper introduces a new technique called "Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization" (AAER) to address this issue.

The key idea behind AAER is to generate and incorporate "abnormal" adversarial examples during the training process. Adversarial examples are small, carefully crafted perturbations to the input data that can trick a machine learning model into making incorrect predictions. By exposing the model to these "abnormal" adversarial examples, the researchers aim to make the model more robust and better able to generalize to new, unseen data. This can help prevent the model from becoming too specialized to the original training data, which is the root cause of catastrophic overfitting.

Technical Explanation

The Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization paper introduces a new technique called "Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization" (AAER) to address the problem of catastrophic overfitting in machine learning models.

The key elements of the AAER method are:

  1. Adversarial Example Generation: The researchers use an adversarial example generation technique to create small, carefully crafted perturbations to the input data that can trick the model into making incorrect predictions.

  2. Abnormal Adversarial Example Generation: The researchers then introduce a novel approach to generate "abnormal" adversarial examples, which are adversarial examples that are significantly different from the normal training data distribution.

  3. Regularization: During the training process, the researchers incorporate these abnormal adversarial examples as a form of regularization, in addition to the normal training data. This encourages the model to learn more robust representations and improves its generalization ability.

The researchers evaluate the AAER method on several benchmark datasets and show that it can effectively eliminate catastrophic overfitting and improve the model's performance on new, unseen data.

Critical Analysis

The Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization paper presents a promising approach to addressing the problem of catastrophic overfitting in machine learning models. The authors acknowledge that while their method is effective, it does have some limitations:

  1. Computational Complexity: The process of generating "abnormal" adversarial examples can be computationally expensive, which may limit the scalability of the AAER method, especially for large-scale machine learning problems.

  2. Generalization to Other Domains: The researchers primarily evaluate their method on image classification tasks, and it's unclear how well the AAER technique would generalize to other types of machine learning problems, such as natural language processing or reinforcement learning.

  3. Interpretability: The paper does not provide much insight into the interpretability of the learned representations or the specific mechanisms by which the AAER method improves generalization. Further research in this direction could help understand the inner workings of the technique and potentially lead to even more effective approaches.

Overall, the Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization paper presents an interesting and promising approach to addressing a critical challenge in machine learning. However, further research and experimentation are needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and potential applications of the AAER method.

Conclusion

The Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization paper introduces a new technique called "Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization" (AAER) to address the problem of catastrophic overfitting in machine learning models. The key idea is to generate and incorporate "abnormal" adversarial examples during the training process, which can help the model learn more robust representations and improve its generalization ability.

The paper presents experimental results showing that the AAER method is effective in eliminating catastrophic overfitting and improving model performance on new, unseen data. While the technique has some limitations in terms of computational complexity and interpretability, it represents an important step forward in addressing a critical challenge in the field of machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization
Total Score

0

Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization

Runqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Tongliang Liu

Single-step adversarial training (SSAT) has demonstrated the potential to achieve both efficiency and robustness. However, SSAT suffers from catastrophic overfitting (CO), a phenomenon that leads to a severely distorted classifier, making it vulnerable to multi-step adversarial attacks. In this work, we observe that some adversarial examples generated on the SSAT-trained network exhibit anomalous behaviour, that is, although these training samples are generated by the inner maximization process, their associated loss decreases instead, which we named abnormal adversarial examples (AAEs). Upon further analysis, we discover a close relationship between AAEs and classifier distortion, as both the number and outputs of AAEs undergo a significant variation with the onset of CO. Given this observation, we re-examine the SSAT process and uncover that before the occurrence of CO, the classifier already displayed a slight distortion, indicated by the presence of few AAEs. Furthermore, the classifier directly optimizing these AAEs will accelerate its distortion, and correspondingly, the variation of AAEs will sharply increase as a result. In such a vicious circle, the classifier rapidly becomes highly distorted and manifests as CO within a few iterations. These observations motivate us to eliminate CO by hindering the generation of AAEs. Specifically, we design a novel method, termed Abnormal Adversarial Examples Regularization (AAER), which explicitly regularizes the variation of AAEs to hinder the classifier from becoming distorted. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method can effectively eliminate CO and further boost adversarial robustness with negligible additional computational overhead.

Read more

9/17/2024

Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut Dependency
Total Score

0

Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut Dependency

Runqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Bo Han, Hang Su, Tongliang Liu

Catastrophic overfitting (CO) presents a significant challenge in single-step adversarial training (AT), manifesting as highly distorted deep neural networks (DNNs) that are vulnerable to multi-step adversarial attacks. However, the underlying factors that lead to the distortion of decision boundaries remain unclear. In this work, we delve into the specific changes within different DNN layers and discover that during CO, the former layers are more susceptible, experiencing earlier and greater distortion, while the latter layers show relative insensitivity. Our analysis further reveals that this increased sensitivity in former layers stems from the formation of pseudo-robust shortcuts, which alone can impeccably defend against single-step adversarial attacks but bypass genuine-robust learning, resulting in distorted decision boundaries. Eliminating these shortcuts can partially restore robustness in DNNs from the CO state, thereby verifying that dependence on them triggers the occurrence of CO. This understanding motivates us to implement adaptive weight perturbations across different layers to hinder the generation of pseudo-robust shortcuts, consequently mitigating CO. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed method, Layer-Aware Adversarial Weight Perturbation (LAP), can effectively prevent CO and further enhance robustness.

Read more

9/17/2024

Preventing Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training: A Bi-level Optimization Perspective
Total Score

0

Preventing Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training: A Bi-level Optimization Perspective

Zhaoxin Wang, Handing Wang, Cong Tian, Yaochu Jin

Adversarial training (AT) has become an effective defense method against adversarial examples (AEs) and it is typically framed as a bi-level optimization problem. Among various AT methods, fast AT (FAT), which employs a single-step attack strategy to guide the training process, can achieve good robustness against adversarial attacks at a low cost. However, FAT methods suffer from the catastrophic overfitting problem, especially on complex tasks or with large-parameter models. In this work, we propose a FAT method termed FGSM-PCO, which mitigates catastrophic overfitting by averting the collapse of the inner optimization problem in the bi-level optimization process. FGSM-PCO generates current-stage AEs from the historical AEs and incorporates them into the training process using an adaptive mechanism. This mechanism determines an appropriate fusion ratio according to the performance of the AEs on the training model. Coupled with a loss function tailored to the training framework, FGSM-PCO can alleviate catastrophic overfitting and help the recovery of an overfitted model to effective training. We evaluate our algorithm across three models and three datasets to validate its effectiveness. Comparative empirical studies against other FAT algorithms demonstrate that our proposed method effectively addresses unresolved overfitting issues in existing algorithms.

Read more

7/18/2024

Exploiting the Layered Intrinsic Dimensionality of Deep Models for Practical Adversarial Training
Total Score

0

Exploiting the Layered Intrinsic Dimensionality of Deep Models for Practical Adversarial Training

Enes Altinisik, Safa Messaoud, Husrev Taha Sencar, Hassan Sajjad, Sanjay Chawla

Despite being a heavily researched topic, Adversarial Training (AT) is rarely, if ever, deployed in practical AI systems for two primary reasons: (i) the gained robustness is frequently accompanied by a drop in generalization and (ii) generating adversarial examples (AEs) is computationally prohibitively expensive. To address these limitations, we propose SMAAT, a new AT algorithm that leverages the manifold conjecture, stating that off-manifold AEs lead to better robustness while on-manifold AEs result in better generalization. Specifically, SMAAT aims at generating a higher proportion of off-manifold AEs by perturbing the intermediate deepnet layer with the lowest intrinsic dimension. This systematically results in better scalability compared to classical AT as it reduces the PGD chains length required for generating the AEs. Additionally, our study provides, to the best of our knowledge, the first explanation for the difference in the generalization and robustness trends between vision and language models, ie., AT results in a drop in generalization in vision models whereas, in encoder-based language models, generalization either improves or remains unchanged. We show that vision transformers and decoder-based models tend to have low intrinsic dimensionality in the earlier layers of the network (more off-manifold AEs), while encoder-based models have low intrinsic dimensionality in the later layers. We demonstrate the efficacy of SMAAT; on several tasks, including robustifying (i) sentiment classifiers, (ii) safety filters in decoder-based models, and (iii) retrievers in RAG setups. SMAAT requires only 25-33% of the GPU time compared to standard AT, while significantly improving robustness across all applications and maintaining comparable generalization.

Read more

5/28/2024