ELITR-Bench: A Meeting Assistant Benchmark for Long-Context Language Models
2403.20262
0
0
Abstract
Research on Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently witnessed an increasing interest in extending models' context size to better capture dependencies within long documents. While benchmarks have been proposed to assess long-range abilities, existing efforts primarily considered generic tasks that are not necessarily aligned with real-world applications. In contrast, our work proposes a new benchmark for long-context LLMs focused on a practical meeting assistant scenario. In this scenario, the long contexts consist of transcripts obtained by automatic speech recognition, presenting unique challenges for LLMs due to the inherent noisiness and oral nature of such data. Our benchmark, named ELITR-Bench, augments the existing ELITR corpus' transcripts with 271 manually crafted questions and their ground-truth answers. Our experiments with recent long-context LLMs on ELITR-Bench highlight a gap between open-source and proprietary models, especially when questions are asked sequentially within a conversation. We also provide a thorough analysis of our GPT-4-based evaluation method, encompassing insights from a crowdsourcing study. Our findings suggest that while GPT-4's evaluation scores are correlated with human judges', its ability to differentiate among more than three score levels may be limited.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents ELITR-Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating meeting assistant AI systems that need to process long conversational contexts.
- ELITR-Bench is designed to test the ability of large language models (LLMs) to summarize, extract key information, and provide other useful outputs from simulated meeting transcripts.
- The benchmark includes a diverse dataset of meeting conversations spanning various domains and complexity levels.
Plain English Explanation
ELITR-Bench is a new tool to test how well AI language models can assist with meeting-related tasks. In many workplaces, employees spend hours in meetings, generating lots of discussion and information. Keeping track of all the details and action items from these long conversations can be challenging for humans.
The researchers created ELITR-Bench to evaluate AI systems that could potentially help by summarizing key points, extracting important action items, or providing other useful outputs from meeting transcripts. The benchmark includes a diverse collection of simulated meeting conversations across different topics and levels of complexity.
By testing AI models on this benchmark, researchers can assess how well the models understand and process the rich context and nuance present in real-world meeting discussions. This could help advance the development of more capable meeting assistant technologies that save time and improve productivity for busy professionals.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces ELITR-Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) on tasks related to meeting assistance. The benchmark consists of a diverse dataset of simulated meeting transcripts covering a range of domains and complexity levels.
The dataset was created by collecting meeting recordings, transcripts, and related materials from various sources and then synthesizing the content into realistic multi-party dialogue. Each meeting transcript is accompanied by annotations such as speaker labels, timestamps, and summaries of key discussion points and action items.
The benchmark defines several evaluation tasks, including meeting summarization, action item extraction, and topic segmentation. Researchers can use ELITR-Bench to assess how well LLMs can understand the rich contextual information present in long-form meeting conversations and generate useful outputs to support meeting participants.
The paper demonstrates the usefulness of the ELITR-Bench dataset through experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs. The results show that existing models struggle with certain benchmark tasks, suggesting opportunities for further research and development of more capable meeting assistant systems.
Critical Analysis
The ELITR-Bench benchmark appears to be a well-designed and thoughtfully constructed resource for advancing meeting assistant AI systems. By including a diverse range of meeting contexts and evaluation tasks, the benchmark provides a comprehensive testbed for assessing the capabilities of LLMs in realistic conversational settings.
One potential limitation noted in the paper is the use of simulated meeting transcripts rather than recordings of real meetings. While the synthetic data is intended to capture the nuances of natural dialogue, there may be subtle differences compared to actual meeting conversations that could impact model performance.
Additionally, the paper acknowledges that the current benchmark tasks, while representative of common meeting-related needs, may not fully capture the wide range of assistant functionalities that users might desire. Expanding the benchmark in the future to include additional tasks, such as proactive agenda generation or action item tracking, could further strengthen its utility.
Overall, ELITR-Bench represents an important step forward in developing more capable and versatile meeting assistant technologies. By providing a standardized evaluation framework, the benchmark can help drive progress in this area and contribute to the broader goal of building AI systems that can seamlessly integrate with and support human collaboration.
Conclusion
The ELITR-Bench benchmark introduces a new resource for evaluating the meeting assistance capabilities of large language models. By curating a diverse dataset of simulated meeting transcripts and defining relevant evaluation tasks, the benchmark aims to advance the development of AI systems that can effectively process and extract useful insights from long-form conversational contexts.
The experiments conducted in the paper demonstrate both the potential and limitations of current state-of-the-art LLMs in meeting assistant applications. The benchmark's comprehensive design and the researchers' commitment to ongoing development suggest that ELITR-Bench will be a valuable tool for the AI research community as it continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in meeting support and collaboration technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding
Yushi Bai, Xin Lv, Jiajie Zhang, Hongchang Lyu, Jiankai Tang, Zhidian Huang, Zhengxiao Du, Xiao Liu, Aohan Zeng, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li
0
0
Although large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance for many language tasks, most of them can only handle texts a few thousand tokens long, limiting their applications on longer sequence inputs, such as books, reports, and codebases. Recent works have proposed methods to improve LLMs' long context capabilities by extending context windows and more sophisticated memory mechanisms. However, comprehensive benchmarks tailored for evaluating long context understanding are lacking. In this paper, we introduce LongBench, the first bilingual, multi-task benchmark for long context understanding, enabling a more rigorous evaluation of long context understanding. LongBench comprises 21 datasets across 6 task categories in both English and Chinese, with an average length of 6,711 words (English) and 13,386 characters (Chinese). These tasks cover key long-text application areas including single-doc QA, multi-doc QA, summarization, few-shot learning, synthetic tasks, and code completion. All datasets in LongBench are standardized into a unified format, allowing for effortless automatic evaluation of LLMs. Upon comprehensive evaluation of 8 LLMs on LongBench, we find that: (1) Commercial model (GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k) outperforms other open-sourced models, but still struggles on longer contexts. (2) Scaled position embedding and fine-tuning on longer sequences lead to substantial improvement on long context understanding. (3) Context compression technique such as retrieval brings improvement for model with weak ability on long contexts, but the performance still lags behind models that have strong long context understanding capability. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/THUDM/LongBench.
6/21/2024
MileBench: Benchmarking MLLMs in Long Context
Dingjie Song, Shunian Chen, Guiming Hardy Chen, Fei Yu, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
0
0
Despite the advancements and impressive performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on benchmarks, their effectiveness in real-world, long-context, and multi-image tasks is unclear due to the benchmarks' limited scope. Existing benchmarks often focus on single-image and short-text samples, and when assessing multi-image tasks, they either limit the image count or focus on specific task (e.g time-series captioning), potentially obscuring the performance challenges of MLLMs. To address these limitations, we introduce MileBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to test the MultImodal Long-contExt capabilities of MLLMs. This benchmark comprises not only multimodal long contexts, but also multiple tasks requiring both comprehension and generation. We establish two distinct evaluation sets, diagnostic and realistic, to systematically assess MLLMs' long-context adaptation capacity and their ability to complete tasks in long-context scenarios. Our experimental results, obtained from testing 22 models, revealed that while the closed-source GPT-4o outperforms others, most open-source MLLMs struggle in long-context situations. Interestingly, the performance gap tends to widen with an increase in the number of images. We strongly encourage an intensification of research efforts towards enhancing MLLMs' long-context capabilities, especially in scenarios involving multiple images.
5/16/2024
Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learning
Tianle Li, Ge Zhang, Quy Duc Do, Xiang Yue, Wenhu Chen
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in handling long sequences. Some models like Gemini could even to be capable of dealing with millions of tokens. However, their performance evaluation has largely been confined to metrics like perplexity and synthetic tasks, which may not fully capture their true abilities in more challenging, real-world scenarios. We introduce a benchmark (LongICLBench) for long in-context learning in extreme-label classification using six datasets with 28 to 174 classes and input lengths from 2K to 50K tokens. Our benchmark requires LLMs to comprehend the entire input to recognize the massive label spaces to make correct predictions. We evaluate on 15 long-context LLMs and find that they perform well on less challenging classification tasks with smaller label space and shorter demonstrations. However, they struggle with more challenging task like Discovery with 174 labels, suggesting a gap in their ability to process long, context-rich sequences. Further analysis reveals a bias towards labels presented later in the sequence and a need for improved reasoning over multiple pieces of information. Our study reveals that long context understanding and reasoning is still a challenging task for the existing LLMs. We believe LongICLBench could serve as a more realistic evaluation for the future long-context LLMs.
6/13/2024
XL$^2$Bench: A Benchmark for Extremely Long Context Understanding with Long-range Dependencies
Xuanfan Ni, Hengyi Cai, Xiaochi Wei, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Piji Li
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks but are constrained by their small context window sizes. Various efforts have been proposed to expand the context window to accommodate even up to 200K input tokens. Meanwhile, building high-quality benchmarks with much longer text lengths and more demanding tasks to provide comprehensive evaluations is of immense practical interest to facilitate long context understanding research of LLMs. However, prior benchmarks create datasets that ostensibly cater to long-text comprehension by expanding the input of traditional tasks, which falls short to exhibit the unique characteristics of long-text understanding, including long dependency tasks and longer text length compatible with modern LLMs' context window size. In this paper, we introduce a benchmark for extremely long context understanding with long-range dependencies, XL$^2$Bench, which includes three scenarios: Fiction Reading, Paper Reading, and Law Reading, and four tasks of increasing complexity: Memory Retrieval, Detailed Understanding, Overall Understanding, and Open-ended Generation, covering 27 subtasks in English and Chinese. It has an average length of 100K+ words (English) and 200K+ characters (Chinese). Evaluating six leading LLMs on XL$^2$Bench, we find that their performance significantly lags behind human levels. Moreover, the observed decline in performance across both the original and enhanced datasets underscores the efficacy of our approach to mitigating data contamination.
4/9/2024