XL$^2$Bench: A Benchmark for Extremely Long Context Understanding with Long-range Dependencies
2404.05446
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse tasks but are constrained by their small context window sizes. Various efforts have been proposed to expand the context window to accommodate even up to 200K input tokens. Meanwhile, building high-quality benchmarks with much longer text lengths and more demanding tasks to provide comprehensive evaluations is of immense practical interest to facilitate long context understanding research of LLMs. However, prior benchmarks create datasets that ostensibly cater to long-text comprehension by expanding the input of traditional tasks, which falls short to exhibit the unique characteristics of long-text understanding, including long dependency tasks and longer text length compatible with modern LLMs' context window size. In this paper, we introduce a benchmark for extremely long context understanding with long-range dependencies, XL$^2$Bench, which includes three scenarios: Fiction Reading, Paper Reading, and Law Reading, and four tasks of increasing complexity: Memory Retrieval, Detailed Understanding, Overall Understanding, and Open-ended Generation, covering 27 subtasks in English and Chinese. It has an average length of 100K+ words (English) and 200K+ characters (Chinese). Evaluating six leading LLMs on XL$^2$Bench, we find that their performance significantly lags behind human levels. Moreover, the observed decline in performance across both the original and enhanced datasets underscores the efficacy of our approach to mitigating data contamination.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces XL²Bench, a new benchmark for evaluating language models' ability to understand extremely long contexts with complex, long-range dependencies.
- The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that require models to reason over large amounts of text and maintain coherence over long distances.
- The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art language models on XL²Bench and find that even the most advanced models struggle to perform well, highlighting the need for further research in this area.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark for long-context understanding, called XL²Bench. This benchmark is designed to test how well language models can understand and reason over very long passages of text, rather than just short snippets.
The tasks in XL²Bench require models to maintain coherence and make connections over large amounts of information, mimicking real-world situations where people need to understand and synthesize large, complex documents. For example, one task might ask a model to summarize the key points of a lengthy legal contract, or to answer questions that span multiple pages of a technical manual.
The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art language models on XL²Bench, and find that even the most advanced models struggle to perform well on these long-context tasks. This suggests that current language models have significant limitations when it comes to understanding lengthy, interconnected text. The paper highlights the need for further research and development to improve models' abilities in this area.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called XL²Bench, which is designed to evaluate language models' understanding of extremely long contexts with complex, long-range dependencies. The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that require models to reason over large amounts of text, maintain coherence, and make connections across long distances.
The tasks in XL²Bench are based on real-world scenarios where people need to comprehend and synthesize information from lengthy, interconnected documents. For example, one task might ask a model to summarize the key points of a lengthy legal contract, while another might require answering questions that span multiple pages of a technical manual.
The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art language models, including GPT-3, PaLM, and Megatron-Turing NLG, on the XL²Bench tasks. They find that even the most advanced models struggle to perform well, achieving relatively low scores across the board. This suggests that current language models have significant limitations when it comes to understanding lengthy, interconnected text, and highlights the need for further research and development in this area.
The paper also introduces a new synthetic dataset called XL²DataGen, which can be used to generate diverse, long-context datasets for training and evaluating models. The authors demonstrate that models trained on XL²DataGen show improved performance on XL²Bench, suggesting that this type of data generation approach could be a useful tool for advancing long-context understanding capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The XL²Bench benchmark presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of natural language processing, as it addresses an important limitation of current language models – their struggle to understand and reason over extremely long contexts with complex, long-range dependencies.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific reasons why state-of-the-art models perform poorly on the XL²Bench tasks. The authors acknowledge this as a limitation, and suggest that further research is needed to understand the underlying causes and develop more effective approaches.
Additionally, the paper focuses on evaluating the performance of language models on the XL²Bench tasks, but does not provide much insight into the real-world implications or potential applications of this type of long-context understanding capability. It would be helpful to see more discussion on how improved long-context understanding could benefit various domains, such as document summarization, code editing, or meeting assistants.
Overall, the XL²Bench benchmark represents an important step forward in the pursuit of more robust and comprehensive language understanding, and the findings presented in this paper suggest that significant challenges remain in this area. Further research and development will be necessary to address these challenges and unlock the full potential of language models in real-world applications.
Conclusion
The XL²Bench benchmark introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing, as it focuses on evaluating language models' ability to understand and reason over extremely long contexts with complex, long-range dependencies.
The authors' evaluation of several state-of-the-art language models on the XL²Bench tasks reveals that even the most advanced models struggle to perform well, highlighting the need for further research and development in this area. The introduction of the XL²DataGen dataset provides a valuable tool for generating diverse, long-context data to support this research.
While the paper does not delve deeply into the specific reasons for the models' poor performance or the real-world implications of improved long-context understanding, it serves as an important foundation for future work in this critical area of language modeling. Continued progress in this direction could unlock new possibilities for language-based applications that require comprehensive understanding of large, interconnected bodies of text.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding
Yushi Bai, Xin Lv, Jiajie Zhang, Hongchang Lyu, Jiankai Tang, Zhidian Huang, Zhengxiao Du, Xiao Liu, Aohan Zeng, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li
0
0
Although large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance for many language tasks, most of them can only handle texts a few thousand tokens long, limiting their applications on longer sequence inputs, such as books, reports, and codebases. Recent works have proposed methods to improve LLMs' long context capabilities by extending context windows and more sophisticated memory mechanisms. However, comprehensive benchmarks tailored for evaluating long context understanding are lacking. In this paper, we introduce LongBench, the first bilingual, multi-task benchmark for long context understanding, enabling a more rigorous evaluation of long context understanding. LongBench comprises 21 datasets across 6 task categories in both English and Chinese, with an average length of 6,711 words (English) and 13,386 characters (Chinese). These tasks cover key long-text application areas including single-doc QA, multi-doc QA, summarization, few-shot learning, synthetic tasks, and code completion. All datasets in LongBench are standardized into a unified format, allowing for effortless automatic evaluation of LLMs. Upon comprehensive evaluation of 8 LLMs on LongBench, we find that: (1) Commercial model (GPT-3.5-Turbo-16k) outperforms other open-sourced models, but still struggles on longer contexts. (2) Scaled position embedding and fine-tuning on longer sequences lead to substantial improvement on long context understanding. (3) Context compression technique such as retrieval brings improvement for model with weak ability on long contexts, but the performance still lags behind models that have strong long context understanding capability. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/THUDM/LongBench.
6/21/2024
Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learning
Tianle Li, Ge Zhang, Quy Duc Do, Xiang Yue, Wenhu Chen
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in handling long sequences. Some models like Gemini could even to be capable of dealing with millions of tokens. However, their performance evaluation has largely been confined to metrics like perplexity and synthetic tasks, which may not fully capture their true abilities in more challenging, real-world scenarios. We introduce a benchmark (LongICLBench) for long in-context learning in extreme-label classification using six datasets with 28 to 174 classes and input lengths from 2K to 50K tokens. Our benchmark requires LLMs to comprehend the entire input to recognize the massive label spaces to make correct predictions. We evaluate on 15 long-context LLMs and find that they perform well on less challenging classification tasks with smaller label space and shorter demonstrations. However, they struggle with more challenging task like Discovery with 174 labels, suggesting a gap in their ability to process long, context-rich sequences. Further analysis reveals a bias towards labels presented later in the sequence and a need for improved reasoning over multiple pieces of information. Our study reveals that long context understanding and reasoning is still a challenging task for the existing LLMs. We believe LongICLBench could serve as a more realistic evaluation for the future long-context LLMs.
6/13/2024
MileBench: Benchmarking MLLMs in Long Context
Dingjie Song, Shunian Chen, Guiming Hardy Chen, Fei Yu, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
0
0
Despite the advancements and impressive performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on benchmarks, their effectiveness in real-world, long-context, and multi-image tasks is unclear due to the benchmarks' limited scope. Existing benchmarks often focus on single-image and short-text samples, and when assessing multi-image tasks, they either limit the image count or focus on specific task (e.g time-series captioning), potentially obscuring the performance challenges of MLLMs. To address these limitations, we introduce MileBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to test the MultImodal Long-contExt capabilities of MLLMs. This benchmark comprises not only multimodal long contexts, but also multiple tasks requiring both comprehension and generation. We establish two distinct evaluation sets, diagnostic and realistic, to systematically assess MLLMs' long-context adaptation capacity and their ability to complete tasks in long-context scenarios. Our experimental results, obtained from testing 22 models, revealed that while the closed-source GPT-4o outperforms others, most open-source MLLMs struggle in long-context situations. Interestingly, the performance gap tends to widen with an increase in the number of images. We strongly encourage an intensification of research efforts towards enhancing MLLMs' long-context capabilities, especially in scenarios involving multiple images.
5/16/2024
NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens
Cunxiang Wang, Ruoxi Ning, Boqi Pan, Tonghui Wu, Qipeng Guo, Cheng Deng, Guangsheng Bao, Xiangkun Hu, Zheng Zhang, Qian Wang, Yue Zhang
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced a new frontier in natural language processing, particularly in understanding and processing long-context information. However, the evaluation of these models' long-context abilities remains a challenge due to the limitations of current benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce NovelQA, a benchmark specifically designed to test the capabilities of LLMs with extended texts. Constructed from English novels, NovelQA offers a unique blend of complexity, length, and narrative coherence, making it an ideal tool for assessing deep textual understanding in LLMs. This paper presents the design and construction of NovelQA, highlighting its manual annotation, and diverse question types. Our evaluation of Long-context LLMs on NovelQA reveals significant insights into the models' performance, particularly emphasizing the challenges they face with multi-hop reasoning, detail-oriented questions, and extremely long input with an average length more than 200,000 tokens. The results underscore the necessity for further advancements in LLMs to improve their long-context comprehension.
6/18/2024