Empirical Bayes for Dynamic Bayesian Networks Using Generalized Variational Inference
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new method for learning dynamic Bayesian networks using empirical Bayes and generalized variational inference.
- The key idea is to use a mixed-integer programming (MIP) approach to estimate the prior distribution, which is then combined with a variational inference technique to learn the model parameters.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several real-world datasets, showing improvements over existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
Dynamic Bayesian networks are a type of machine learning model that can capture how data changes over time. This paper presents a new way to train these models that combines two key ideas:
-
Empirical Bayes: This means using the data itself to estimate the "prior" distribution, which represents our initial beliefs about the model parameters before seeing the data. This is similar to the approach used in this paper on Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
-
Generalized Variational Inference: This is a technique for efficiently learning the model parameters by approximating the true posterior distribution. It's related to the amortized inference methods explored in this work.
By bringing these two ideas together, the authors are able to learn dynamic Bayesian network models that perform well on real-world datasets. This could be useful in a variety of applications where we want to understand how complex systems evolve over time, such as financial markets, traffic patterns, or gene expression.
Technical Explanation
The key technical innovation in this paper is the use of a mixed-integer programming (MIP) approach to estimate the prior distribution for the dynamic Bayesian network model. This allows the authors to capture the complex structure of the model parameters without making overly restrictive assumptions.
The MIP-based prior estimation is then combined with a generalized variational inference technique to efficiently learn the model parameters. This variational approach builds on the theoretical foundations explored in this work, allowing the authors to derive tight lower bounds on the log-likelihood and optimize the model parameters accordingly.
The authors evaluate their approach on several real-world datasets, including those related to gene expression, traffic patterns, and financial markets. They show that their method outperforms existing techniques, such as the implicit generative prior approach used for Bayesian neural networks.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the proposed method is the computational complexity of the MIP-based prior estimation, which could make it challenging to scale to very large-scale problems. The authors acknowledge this issue and suggest avenues for further research to address it, such as exploring approximate or heuristic methods for prior estimation.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the sensitivity of the method to hyperparameter choices or the robustness of the results to variations in the data. Further investigation of these aspects could help to better understand the practical limitations and potential issues with the proposed approach.
Overall, the paper presents a promising new technique for learning dynamic Bayesian networks that combines empirical Bayes with generalized variational inference. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach, but more work may be needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel method for learning dynamic Bayesian network models using a combination of empirical Bayes and generalized variational inference. By leveraging a mixed-integer programming approach to estimate the prior distribution, the authors are able to capture the complex structure of the model parameters and learn accurate representations of real-world datasets.
The results suggest that this technique could be a valuable tool for a variety of applications where we need to understand how complex systems evolve over time. While the computational complexity of the prior estimation may be a limiting factor, the authors have proposed several directions for future research to address this challenge.
Overall, this work represents an important contribution to the field of Bayesian modeling and inference, and it may inspire further developments in the use of powerful optimization techniques like MIP for probabilistic modeling tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Empirical Bayes for Dynamic Bayesian Networks Using Generalized Variational Inference
Vyacheslav Kungurtsev, Apaar, Aarya Khandelwal, Parth Sandeep Rastogi, Bapi Chatterjee, Jakub Marev{c}ek
In this work, we demonstrate the Empirical Bayes approach to learning a Dynamic Bayesian Network. By starting with several point estimates of structure and weights, we can use a data-driven prior to subsequently obtain a model to quantify uncertainty. This approach uses a recent development of Generalized Variational Inference, and indicates the potential of sampling the uncertainty of a mixture of DAG structures as well as a parameter posterior.
Read more7/2/2024
🔮
0
Bayesian learning of Causal Structure and Mechanisms with GFlowNets and Variational Bayes
Mizu Nishikawa-Toomey, Tristan Deleu, Jithendaraa Subramanian, Yoshua Bengio, Laurent Charlin
Bayesian causal structure learning aims to learn a posterior distribution over directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), and the mechanisms that define the relationship between parent and child variables. By taking a Bayesian approach, it is possible to reason about the uncertainty of the causal model. The notion of modelling the uncertainty over models is particularly crucial for causal structure learning since the model could be unidentifiable when given only a finite amount of observational data. In this paper, we introduce a novel method to jointly learn the structure and mechanisms of the causal model using Variational Bayes, which we call Variational Bayes-DAG-GFlowNet (VBG). We extend the method of Bayesian causal structure learning using GFlowNets to learn not only the posterior distribution over the structure, but also the parameters of a linear-Gaussian model. Our results on simulated data suggest that VBG is competitive against several baselines in modelling the posterior over DAGs and mechanisms, while offering several advantages over existing methods, including the guarantee to sample acyclic graphs, and the flexibility to generalize to non-linear causal mechanisms.
Read more6/4/2024
🤯
0
A Variational Approach to Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference
Cheng Zhang, Frederick A. Matsen IV
Bayesian phylogenetic inference is currently done via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with simple proposal mechanisms. This hinders exploration efficiency and often requires long runs to deliver accurate posterior estimates. In this paper, we present an alternative approach: a variational framework for Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. We propose combining subsplit Bayesian networks, an expressive graphical model for tree topology distributions, and a structured amortization of the branch lengths over tree topologies for a suitable variational family of distributions. We train the variational approximation via stochastic gradient ascent and adopt gradient estimators for continuous and discrete variational parameters separately to deal with the composite latent space of phylogenetic models. We show that our variational approach provides competitive performance to MCMC, while requiring much fewer (though more costly) iterations due to a more efficient exploration mechanism enabled by variational inference. Experiments on a benchmark of challenging real data Bayesian phylogenetic inference problems demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our methods.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Scalable Variational Causal Discovery Unconstrained by Acyclicity
Nu Hoang, Bao Duong, Thin Nguyen
Bayesian causal discovery offers the power to quantify epistemic uncertainties among a broad range of structurally diverse causal theories potentially explaining the data, represented in forms of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). However, existing methods struggle with efficient DAG sampling due to the complex acyclicity constraint. In this study, we propose a scalable Bayesian approach to effectively learn the posterior distribution over causal graphs given observational data thanks to the ability to generate DAGs without explicitly enforcing acyclicity. Specifically, we introduce a novel differentiable DAG sampling method that can generate a valid acyclic causal graph by mapping an unconstrained distribution of implicit topological orders to a distribution over DAGs. Given this efficient DAG sampling scheme, we are able to model the posterior distribution over causal graphs using a simple variational distribution over a continuous domain, which can be learned via the variational inference framework. Extensive empirical experiments on both simulated and real datasets demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed model compared to several state-of-the-art baselines.
Read more8/30/2024