Enhancing AI-Driven Psychological Consultation: Layered Prompts with Large Language Models
0
š¬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Paper explores using layered prompts with large language models (LLMs) to enhance AI-driven psychological consultation
- Aims to improve empathy, emotional intelligence, and scenario-based responses in AI mental health support
- Proposes a framework for prompt engineering and model fine-tuning to create more effective AI psychological assistants
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to enhancing AI-driven psychological consultation using layered prompts with large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to leverage the power of LLMs, like GPT-3, to provide more empathetic, emotionally intelligent, and scenario-based responses in AI-driven mental health support.
The authors propose a framework for prompt engineering and model fine-tuning to create more effective AI psychological assistants. This involves layering different types of prompts, such as empathy-driven and scenario-based prompts, to guide the LLM's responses and make them more aligned with the needs of mental health support.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a layered prompt framework for enhancing the performance of LLMs in AI-driven psychological consultation. The key elements of this framework include:
-
Empathy-Driven Prompts: These prompts are designed to elicit more empathetic and emotionally intelligent responses from the LLM, helping it better understand and respond to the user's emotional state and needs.
-
Scenario-Based Prompts: These prompts present the LLM with specific mental health scenarios, guiding it to generate more contextually appropriate and helpful responses.
-
Prompt Layering: The authors combine the empathy-driven and scenario-based prompts in a layered approach, allowing the LLM to draw on multiple sources of information to provide a more comprehensive and tailored response.
The paper also discusses the process of fine-tuning the LLM on a dataset of mental health dialogues to further improve its performance in psychological consultation tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to enhancing AI-driven psychological consultation, but it also acknowledges some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Ethical Considerations: The authors note the importance of ensuring the AI system's responses are ethical, unbiased, and do not cause harm to users. Further research is needed to address these concerns.
-
Generalization: The authors highlight the need to test the layered prompt framework on diverse mental health scenarios and populations to assess its generalizability.
-
User Trust and Acceptance: The paper recognizes the challenge of building user trust and acceptance in AI-driven psychological consultation, which may require additional research on user perceptions and preferences.
-
Limitations of LLMs: While LLMs have shown impressive capabilities, they still have limitations in terms of their understanding of human psychology and ability to provide truly personalized and nuanced support. Addressing these limitations may require further advancements in AI and cognitive science.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing AI-driven psychological consultation using a layered prompt framework with large language models. By incorporating empathy-driven and scenario-based prompts, the authors aim to create AI assistants that can provide more emotionally intelligent, contextually appropriate, and helpful support for users seeking mental health assistance. While the approach shows promise, the authors also highlight important ethical and technical considerations that warrant further research and development to realize the full potential of AI in this domain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
0
Enhancing AI-Driven Psychological Consultation: Layered Prompts with Large Language Models
Rafael Souza, Jia-Hao Lim, Alexander Davis
Psychological consultation is essential for improving mental health and well-being, yet challenges such as the shortage of qualified professionals and scalability issues limit its accessibility. To address these challenges, we explore the use of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 to augment psychological consultation services. Our approach introduces a novel layered prompting system that dynamically adapts to user input, enabling comprehensive and relevant information gathering. We also develop empathy-driven and scenario-based prompts to enhance the LLM's emotional intelligence and contextual understanding in therapeutic settings. We validated our approach through experiments using a newly collected dataset of psychological consultation dialogues, demonstrating significant improvements in response quality. The results highlight the potential of our prompt engineering techniques to enhance AI-driven psychological consultation, offering a scalable and accessible solution to meet the growing demand for mental health support.
Read more8/30/2024
0
Toward Large Language Models as a Therapeutic Tool: Comparing Prompting Techniques to Improve GPT-Delivered Problem-Solving Therapy
Daniil Filienko, Yinzhou Wang, Caroline El Jazmi, Serena Xie, Trevor Cohen, Martine De Cock, Weichao Yuwen
While Large Language Models (LLMs) are being quickly adapted to many domains, including healthcare, their strengths and pitfalls remain under-explored. In our study, we examine the effects of prompt engineering to guide Large Language Models (LLMs) in delivering parts of a Problem-Solving Therapy (PST) session via text, particularly during the symptom identification and assessment phase for personalized goal setting. We present evaluation results of the models' performances by automatic metrics and experienced medical professionals. We demonstrate that the models' capability to deliver protocolized therapy can be improved with the proper use of prompt engineering methods, albeit with limitations. To our knowledge, this study is among the first to assess the effects of various prompting techniques in enhancing a generalist model's ability to deliver psychotherapy, focusing on overall quality, consistency, and empathy. Exploring LLMs' potential in delivering psychotherapy holds promise with the current shortage of mental health professionals amid significant needs, enhancing the potential utility of AI-based and AI-enhanced care services.
Read more9/4/2024
š¬
0
Optimizing Psychological Counseling with Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models
Wenjie Li, Tianyu Sun, Kun Qian, Wenhong Wang
The advent of large language models (LLMs) has significantly advanced various fields, including natural language processing and automated dialogue systems. This paper explores the application of LLMs in psychological counseling, addressing the increasing demand for mental health services. We present a method for instruction tuning LLMs with specialized prompts to enhance their performance in providing empathetic, relevant, and supportive responses. Our approach involves developing a comprehensive dataset of counseling-specific prompts, refining them through feedback from professional counselors, and conducting rigorous evaluations using both automatic metrics and human assessments. The results demonstrate that our instruction-tuned model outperforms several baseline LLMs, highlighting its potential as a scalable and accessible tool for mental health support.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health Support
Saadia Gabriel, Isha Puri, Xuhai Xu, Matteo Malgaroli, Marzyeh Ghassemi
Large language models (LLMs) are already being piloted for clinical use in hospital systems like NYU Langone, Dana-Farber and the NHS. A proposed deployment use case is psychotherapy, where a LLM-powered chatbot can treat a patient undergoing a mental health crisis. Deployment of LLMs for mental health response could hypothetically broaden access to psychotherapy and provide new possibilities for personalizing care. However, recent high-profile failures, like damaging dieting advice offered by the Tessa chatbot to patients with eating disorders, have led to doubt about their reliability in high-stakes and safety-critical settings. In this work, we develop an evaluation framework for determining whether LLM response is a viable and ethical path forward for the automation of mental health treatment. Using human evaluation with trained clinicians and automatic quality-of-care metrics grounded in psychology research, we compare the responses provided by peer-to-peer responders to those provided by a state-of-the-art LLM. We show that LLMs like GPT-4 use implicit and explicit cues to infer patient demographics like race. We then show that there are statistically significant discrepancies between patient subgroups: Responses to Black posters consistently have lower empathy than for any other demographic group (2%-13% lower than the control group). Promisingly, we do find that the manner in which responses are generated significantly impacts the quality of the response. We conclude by proposing safety guidelines for the potential deployment of LLMs for mental health response.
Read more5/21/2024