Enhancing Fairness through Reweighting: A Path to Attain the Sufficiency Rule
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a reweighting method to improve fairness in machine learning models
- Aims to satisfy the sufficiency rule, a fairness criterion where the model output is conditionally independent of sensitive attributes given the true label
- Provides theoretical and empirical analysis of the proposed approach
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a technique to make machine learning models more fair and unbiased. The key idea is to reweight the training data in a way that helps the model satisfy the sufficiency rule.
The sufficiency rule means that the model's predictions should be independent of sensitive attributes (like race or gender) once you know the true label. In other words, the model should treat people fairly regardless of their sensitive attributes, as long as the true label is the same.
The reweighting approach aims to adjust the importance of different training examples so that the model learns to satisfy this sufficiency rule. This helps ensure the model makes fair predictions that aren't unduly influenced by sensitive attributes.
The paper provides a detailed mathematical analysis of this reweighting technique, as well as experiments demonstrating its effectiveness at improving fairness in machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a reweighting approach to enhance the fairness of machine learning models by satisfying the sufficiency rule. The sufficiency rule is a fairness criterion which requires the model output to be conditionally independent of sensitive attributes given the true label.
The key idea is to learn a set of reweighting factors that adjust the importance of different training examples. This encourages the model to learn representations that satisfy the sufficiency rule. The authors provide a theoretical analysis showing that this reweighting scheme can indeed lead to models that attain the sufficiency rule.
Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed reweighting approach can significantly improve various fairness metrics compared to standard training methods. The authors also show that the reweighted models maintain good predictive performance on the original task.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-grounded technical approach to enhancing fairness in machine learning models. The focus on satisfying the sufficiency rule is a strong theoretical foundation, as this criterion ensures fair treatment of individuals regardless of sensitive attributes.
However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed reweighting approach. For example, it would be useful to understand how sensitive the method is to the quality and coverage of the training data, as poor data could still lead to biased models despite the reweighting.
Additionally, the paper does not explore how the reweighting factors themselves could potentially encode biases, or how to ensure transparency and interpretability of the fairness-enhanced models. Further research is needed to address these aspects and provide a more holistic view of the method's strengths and weaknesses.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel reweighting technique to improve the fairness of machine learning models by satisfying the sufficiency rule. The theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing fairness while maintaining good predictive performance.
The work contributes to the growing body of research on fair machine learning, providing a principled way to incorporate fairness considerations into the model training process. As machine learning systems become more widely deployed, techniques like this will be crucial for ensuring they are equitable and unbiased.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing Fairness through Reweighting: A Path to Attain the Sufficiency Rule
Xuan Zhao, Klaus Broelemann, Salvatore Ruggieri, Gjergji Kasneci
We introduce an innovative approach to enhancing the empirical risk minimization (ERM) process in model training through a refined reweighting scheme of the training data to enhance fairness. This scheme aims to uphold the sufficiency rule in fairness by ensuring that optimal predictors maintain consistency across diverse sub-groups. We employ a bilevel formulation to address this challenge, wherein we explore sample reweighting strategies. Unlike conventional methods that hinge on model size, our formulation bases generalization complexity on the space of sample weights. We discretize the weights to improve training speed. Empirical validation of our method showcases its effectiveness and robustness, revealing a consistent improvement in the balance between prediction performance and fairness metrics across various experiments.
Read more8/27/2024
🔄
0
Boosting Fair Classifier Generalization through Adaptive Priority Reweighing
Zhihao Hu, Yiran Xu, Mengnan Du, Jindong Gu, Xinmei Tian, Fengxiang He
With the increasing penetration of machine learning applications in critical decision-making areas, calls for algorithmic fairness are more prominent. Although there have been various modalities to improve algorithmic fairness through learning with fairness constraints, their performance does not generalize well in the test set. A performance-promising fair algorithm with better generalizability is needed. This paper proposes a novel adaptive reweighing method to eliminate the impact of the distribution shifts between training and test data on model generalizability. Most previous reweighing methods propose to assign a unified weight for each (sub)group. Rather, our method granularly models the distance from the sample predictions to the decision boundary. Our adaptive reweighing method prioritizes samples closer to the decision boundary and assigns a higher weight to improve the generalizability of fair classifiers. Extensive experiments are performed to validate the generalizability of our adaptive priority reweighing method for accuracy and fairness measures (i.e., equal opportunity, equalized odds, and demographic parity) in tabular benchmarks. We also highlight the performance of our method in improving the fairness of language and vision models. The code is available at https://github.com/che2198/APW.
Read more5/21/2024
💬
0
Recovering from Biased Data: Can Fairness Constraints Improve Accuracy?
Avrim Blum, Kevin Stangl
Multiple fairness constraints have been proposed in the literature, motivated by a range of concerns about how demographic groups might be treated unfairly by machine learning classifiers. In this work we consider a different motivation; learning from biased training data. We posit several ways in which training data may be biased, including having a more noisy or negatively biased labeling process on members of a disadvantaged group, or a decreased prevalence of positive or negative examples from the disadvantaged group, or both. Given such biased training data, Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) may produce a classifier that not only is biased but also has suboptimal accuracy on the true data distribution. We examine the ability of fairness-constrained ERM to correct this problem. In particular, we find that the Equal Opportunity fairness constraint (Hardt, Price, and Srebro 2016) combined with ERM will provably recover the Bayes Optimal Classifier under a range of bias models. We also consider other recovery methods including reweighting the training data, Equalized Odds, and Demographic Parity. These theoretical results provide additional motivation for considering fairness interventions even if an actor cares primarily about accuracy.
Read more8/23/2024
🤔
0
Inference-Time Rule Eraser: Distilling and Removing Bias Rules to Mitigate Bias in Deployed Models
Yi Zhang, Dongyuan Lu, Jitao Sang
Machine learning models often make predictions based on biased features such as gender, race, and other social attributes, posing significant fairness risks, especially in societal applications, such as hiring, banking, and criminal justice. Traditional approaches to addressing this issue involve retraining or fine-tuning neural networks with fairness-aware optimization objectives. However, these methods can be impractical due to significant computational resources, complex industrial tests, and the associated CO2 footprint. Additionally, regular users often fail to fine-tune models because they lack access to model parameters In this paper, we introduce the Inference-Time Rule Eraser (Eraser), a novel method designed to address fairness concerns by removing biased decision-making rules from deployed models during inference without altering model weights. We begin by establishing a theoretical foundation for modifying model outputs to eliminate biased rules through Bayesian analysis. Next, we present a specific implementation of Eraser that involves two stages: (1) distilling the biased rules from the deployed model into an additional patch model, and (2) removing these biased rules from the output of the deployed model during inference. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach, showcasing its superior performance in addressing fairness concerns in AI systems.
Read more8/28/2024