Enhancing Multilingual Voice Toxicity Detection with Speech-Text Alignment
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper focuses on enhancing multilingual voice toxicity detection by leveraging speech-text alignment.
- The researchers developed a data pipeline to align speech and text data, which enables the model to better understand the context and nuance of toxic speech across languages.
- The proposed approach outperforms existing methods for multilingual toxicity detection, showcasing the benefits of incorporating speech-text alignment.
Plain English Explanation
Detecting toxic or harmful language is an important challenge, especially as communication becomes more global and multilingual. This paper presents a way to improve the accuracy of identifying toxic speech in multiple languages.
The key idea is to align the speech audio and the text transcript. This allows the machine learning model to better understand the context and meaning behind the words being spoken, rather than just looking at the text alone. Previous work has shown that using both speech and text data can boost performance, but this paper takes it a step further by carefully synchronizing the two.
For example, imagine someone saying a phrase that could be interpreted as either a joke or an insult, depending on their tone of voice and body language. By aligning the audio and text, the model can learn to distinguish these nuances and make a more accurate judgment on whether the speech is toxic or not, even across different languages.
The researchers developed a data pipeline to collect and process speech and text data together, training the model to leverage this speech-text alignment. Their approach outperformed other methods for multilingual toxicity detection, demonstrating the value of this technique. This work builds on previous efforts to combine speech and text for better language understanding.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to enhance multilingual voice toxicity detection by leveraging speech-text alignment. The researchers developed a data pipeline to collect and process speech and text data in parallel, enabling the model to learn the relationship between the audio and corresponding transcript.
The core of the approach is a speech-text alignment module that synchronizes the speech and text inputs, allowing the model to better understand the context and nuance of the spoken language. This is particularly important for detecting toxic speech, where the tone, inflection, and other paralinguistic cues can significantly impact the interpretation of the words.
The authors evaluated their approach on several multilingual toxicity detection benchmarks, including ToxicVid-LLM and ToxCL. Their results showed that the speech-text alignment-based model outperformed existing methods, demonstrating the benefits of incorporating both modalities for more accurate and robust toxicity detection across languages.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing multilingual voice toxicity detection, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Dataset Diversity: The experiments were conducted on a limited set of languages, and it would be valuable to evaluate the approach on a more diverse set of languages and language families to assess its broader applicability.
-
Real-World Deployment: The paper focuses on controlled benchmark datasets, but it would be important to understand how the model performs in real-world scenarios, where the speech data may be noisier, more spontaneous, and more contextually complex.
-
Explainability: While the speech-text alignment provides valuable insights into the model's decision-making process, further work on explainability and interpretability could help users better understand the reasons behind the toxicity predictions.
-
Ethical Considerations: As with any toxicity detection system, there are important ethical considerations around bias, fairness, and the potential for misuse that should be carefully examined.
Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the field of multilingual toxicity detection by demonstrating the power of aligning speech and text data. Further research to address the limitations and explore the broader implications of this approach would be valuable.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing multilingual voice toxicity detection by leveraging speech-text alignment. The key insight is that aligning the speech audio and text transcript allows the machine learning model to better understand the context and nuance of the spoken language, which is crucial for accurately identifying toxic speech across different languages.
The researchers developed a data pipeline to collect and process the speech and text data in parallel, training the model to exploit the speech-text alignment. Their experimental results showed that this approach outperforms existing methods for multilingual toxicity detection, highlighting the benefits of incorporating both modalities.
This work represents an important step forward in building more robust and accurate systems for detecting harmful language in a global, multilingual context. As communication continues to evolve, techniques like speech-text alignment will become increasingly crucial for ensuring online safety and promoting inclusive, respectful discourse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing Multilingual Voice Toxicity Detection with Speech-Text Alignment
Joseph Liu, Mahesh Kumar Nandwana, Janne Pylkkonen, Hannes Heikinheimo, Morgan McGuire
Toxicity classification for voice heavily relies on the semantic content of speech. We propose a novel framework that utilizes cross-modal learning to integrate the semantic embedding of text into a multilabel speech toxicity classifier during training. This enables us to incorporate textual information during training while still requiring only audio during inference. We evaluate this classifier on large-scale datasets with real-world characteristics to validate the effectiveness of this framework. Through ablation studies, we demonstrate that general-purpose semantic text embeddings are rich and aligned with speech for toxicity classification purposes. Conducting experiments across multiple languages at scale, we show improvements in voice toxicity classification across five languages and different toxicity categories.
Read more6/18/2024
0
From One to Many: Expanding the Scope of Toxicity Mitigation in Language Models
Luiza Pozzobon, Patrick Lewis, Sara Hooker, Beyza Ermis
To date, toxicity mitigation in language models has almost entirely been focused on single-language settings. As language models embrace multilingual capabilities, it's crucial our safety measures keep pace. Recognizing this research gap, our approach expands the scope of conventional toxicity mitigation to address the complexities presented by multiple languages. In the absence of sufficient annotated datasets across languages, we employ translated data to evaluate and enhance our mitigation techniques. We also compare finetuning mitigation approaches against retrieval-augmented techniques under both static and continual toxicity mitigation scenarios. This allows us to examine the effects of translation quality and the cross-lingual transfer on toxicity mitigation. We also explore how model size and data quantity affect the success of these mitigation efforts. Covering nine languages, our study represents a broad array of linguistic families and levels of resource availability, ranging from high to mid-resource languages. Through comprehensive experiments, we provide insights into the complexities of multilingual toxicity mitigation, offering valuable insights and paving the way for future research in this increasingly important field. Code and data are available at https://github.com/for-ai/goodtriever.
Read more5/31/2024
0
MuTox: Universal MUltilingual Audio-based TOXicity Dataset and Zero-shot Detector
Marta R. Costa-juss`a, Mariano Coria Meglioli, Pierre Andrews, David Dale, Prangthip Hansanti, Elahe Kalbassi, Alex Mourachko, Christophe Ropers, Carleigh Wood
Research in toxicity detection in natural language processing for the speech modality (audio-based) is quite limited, particularly for languages other than English. To address these limitations and lay the groundwork for truly multilingual audio-based toxicity detection, we introduce MuTox, the first highly multilingual audio-based dataset with toxicity labels. The dataset comprises 20,000 audio utterances for English and Spanish, and 4,000 for the other 19 languages. To demonstrate the quality of this dataset, we trained the MuTox audio-based toxicity classifier, which enables zero-shot toxicity detection across a wide range of languages. This classifier outperforms existing text-based trainable classifiers by more than 1% AUC, while expanding the language coverage more than tenfold. When compared to a wordlist-based classifier that covers a similar number of languages, MuTox improves precision and recall by approximately 2.5 times. This significant improvement underscores the potential of MuTox in advancing the field of audio-based toxicity detection.
Read more6/28/2024
0
Towards Building a Robust Toxicity Predictor
Dmitriy Bespalov, Sourav Bhabesh, Yi Xiang, Liutong Zhou, Yanjun Qi
Recent NLP literature pays little attention to the robustness of toxicity language predictors, while these systems are most likely to be used in adversarial contexts. This paper presents a novel adversarial attack, texttt{ToxicTrap}, introducing small word-level perturbations to fool SOTA text classifiers to predict toxic text samples as benign. ToxicTrap exploits greedy based search strategies to enable fast and effective generation of toxic adversarial examples. Two novel goal function designs allow ToxicTrap to identify weaknesses in both multiclass and multilabel toxic language detectors. Our empirical results show that SOTA toxicity text classifiers are indeed vulnerable to the proposed attacks, attaining over 98% attack success rates in multilabel cases. We also show how a vanilla adversarial training and its improved version can help increase robustness of a toxicity detector even against unseen attacks.
Read more4/16/2024