ToXCL: A Unified Framework for Toxic Speech Detection and Explanation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes ToXCL, a unified framework for detecting and explaining toxic speech in online platforms.
- The framework combines toxic speech detection and explanation in a single model, allowing for more transparent and interpretable predictions.
- The authors evaluate ToXCL on several benchmark datasets and show it outperforms state-of-the-art toxic speech detection models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces ToXCL, a new system for identifying and understanding toxic online content. Toxic speech, such as hate speech, bullying, and abusive language, is a major problem on many social media platforms and can have harmful effects on individuals and communities.
ToXCL aims to address this issue by providing a single framework that not only detects toxic speech, but also explains the reasons behind its predictions. This allows users and platform moderators to better understand why certain content is flagged as toxic, rather than relying on a "black box" model.
The researchers tested ToXCL on several existing datasets of toxic online comments and found that it outperformed other state-of-the-art toxic speech detection systems. This suggests ToXCL could be a valuable tool for identifying and addressing toxic content in a more transparent and accountable way.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of ToXCL is its unified architecture that combines toxic speech detection and explanation. The model takes in a piece of text and outputs both a toxicity score (the probability the text is toxic) as well as an explanation for that prediction.
The explanation is generated by a separate component that examines the input text and identifies the specific words, phrases, or contextual cues that led the model to its toxicity assessment. This allows users to understand the basis for the model's decision, rather than treating it as a "black box."
ToXCL is evaluated on several benchmark datasets for toxic speech detection, including Perspective API and Hateful Memes. The results show that ToXCL outperforms previous state-of-the-art models in terms of both detection accuracy and the quality of the explanations provided.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge several limitations of their work. First, the dataset used to train ToXCL may not fully capture the nuances and context-dependent nature of toxic speech, leading to potential biases or blindspots in the model's performance.
Additionally, the explanation component of ToXCL, while valuable, may not always provide a complete or fully satisfactory rationale for the model's predictions. There is still room for improvement in generating more comprehensive and insightful explanations.
Further research is also needed to evaluate the real-world impact and usability of ToXCL in actual online moderation and content curation workflows. Its effectiveness in reducing harm and empowering users will depend on how well it integrates with existing platform policies and moderation practices.
Conclusion
The ToXCL framework represents a promising step towards more transparent and accountable toxic speech detection systems. By unifying detection and explanation, it provides a powerful tool for identifying and understanding harmful online content.
As online platforms and communities continue to grapple with the challenges of toxic speech, tools like ToXCL could play a crucial role in developing more effective and ethical content moderation strategies. Further research and refinement of this approach could lead to significant improvements in the way we address toxic behavior on the internet.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ToXCL: A Unified Framework for Toxic Speech Detection and Explanation
Nhat M. Hoang, Xuan Long Do, Duc Anh Do, Duc Anh Vu, Luu Anh Tuan
The proliferation of online toxic speech is a pertinent problem posing threats to demographic groups. While explicit toxic speech contains offensive lexical signals, implicit one consists of coded or indirect language. Therefore, it is crucial for models not only to detect implicit toxic speech but also to explain its toxicity. This draws a unique need for unified frameworks that can effectively detect and explain implicit toxic speech. Prior works mainly formulated the task of toxic speech detection and explanation as a text generation problem. Nonetheless, models trained using this strategy can be prone to suffer from the consequent error propagation problem. Moreover, our experiments reveal that the detection results of such models are much lower than those that focus only on the detection task. To bridge these gaps, we introduce ToXCL, a unified framework for the detection and explanation of implicit toxic speech. Our model consists of three modules: a (i) Target Group Generator to generate the targeted demographic group(s) of a given post; an (ii) Encoder-Decoder Model in which the encoder focuses on detecting implicit toxic speech and is boosted by a (iii) Teacher Classifier via knowledge distillation, and the decoder generates the necessary explanation. ToXCL achieves new state-of-the-art effectiveness, and outperforms baselines significantly.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Tox-BART: Leveraging Toxicity Attributes for Explanation Generation of Implicit Hate Speech
Neemesh Yadav, Sarah Masud, Vikram Goyal, Vikram Goyal, Md Shad Akhtar, Tanmoy Chakraborty
Employing language models to generate explanations for an incoming implicit hate post is an active area of research. The explanation is intended to make explicit the underlying stereotype and aid content moderators. The training often combines top-k relevant knowledge graph (KG) tuples to provide world knowledge and improve performance on standard metrics. Interestingly, our study presents conflicting evidence for the role of the quality of KG tuples in generating implicit explanations. Consequently, simpler models incorporating external toxicity signals outperform KG-infused models. Compared to the KG-based setup, we observe a comparable performance for SBIC (LatentHatred) datasets with a performance variation of +0.44 (+0.49), +1.83 (-1.56), and -4.59 (+0.77) in BLEU, ROUGE-L, and BERTScore. Further human evaluation and error analysis reveal that our proposed setup produces more precise explanations than zero-shot GPT-3.5, highlighting the intricate nature of the task.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Enhancing Multilingual Voice Toxicity Detection with Speech-Text Alignment
Joseph Liu, Mahesh Kumar Nandwana, Janne Pylkkonen, Hannes Heikinheimo, Morgan McGuire
Toxicity classification for voice heavily relies on the semantic content of speech. We propose a novel framework that utilizes cross-modal learning to integrate the semantic embedding of text into a multilabel speech toxicity classifier during training. This enables us to incorporate textual information during training while still requiring only audio during inference. We evaluate this classifier on large-scale datasets with real-world characteristics to validate the effectiveness of this framework. Through ablation studies, we demonstrate that general-purpose semantic text embeddings are rich and aligned with speech for toxicity classification purposes. Conducting experiments across multiple languages at scale, we show improvements in voice toxicity classification across five languages and different toxicity categories.
Read more6/18/2024
0
ToVo: Toxicity Taxonomy via Voting
Tinh Son Luong, Thanh-Thien Le, Thang Viet Doan, Linh Ngo Van, Thien Huu Nguyen, Diep Thi-Ngoc Nguyen
Existing toxic detection models face significant limitations, such as lack of transparency, customization, and reproducibility. These challenges stem from the closed-source nature of their training data and the paucity of explanations for their evaluation mechanism. To address these issues, we propose a dataset creation mechanism that integrates voting and chain-of-thought processes, producing a high-quality open-source dataset for toxic content detection. Our methodology ensures diverse classification metrics for each sample and includes both classification scores and explanatory reasoning for the classifications. We utilize the dataset created through our proposed mechanism to train our model, which is then compared against existing widely-used detectors. Our approach not only enhances transparency and customizability but also facilitates better fine-tuning for specific use cases. This work contributes a robust framework for developing toxic content detection models, emphasizing openness and adaptability, thus paving the way for more effective and user-specific content moderation solutions.
Read more6/24/2024