Enhancing Systematic Decompositional Natural Language Inference Using Informal Logic
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores using informal logic to enhance a systematic decompositional approach to natural language inference (NLI).
- NLI is the task of determining whether one sentence (the premise) logically entails, contradicts, or is neutral with respect to another sentence (the hypothesis).
- The authors propose a method that decomposes the NLI task into a sequence of more fine-grained logical inferences, and uses informal logical principles to guide and improve this process.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the task of natural language inference (NLI). NLI is about determining the logical relationship between two sentences - whether one sentence (the premise) logically follows from, contradicts, or is neutral with respect to another sentence (the hypothesis).
The authors suggest breaking down the NLI task into a series of more detailed logical steps, rather than trying to make the overall judgment in one go. This "decompositional" approach allows the model to focus on smaller, more manageable pieces of reasoning.
To guide and enhance this decompositional process, the authors incorporate principles from informal logic. Informal logic deals with everyday reasoning, and provides a framework for evaluating the strength and validity of arguments, beyond just formal logical rules.
By combining the decompositional approach with informal logical reasoning, the authors aim to create a more systematic and effective NLI system, better equipped to handle the complexities of natural language.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a decompositional approach to recognizing textual entailment (RTE), a core task in natural language inference (NLI).
The key ideas are:
-
Decompositional RTE: Rather than making a single overall judgment of entailment, contradiction, or neutrality, the model decomposes the task into a sequence of more fine-grained logical inferences. This allows the model to focus on smaller, more manageable reasoning steps.
-
Informal Logic: To guide and enhance the decompositional process, the authors incorporate principles from informal logic. This provides a richer framework for evaluating the strength and validity of the intermediate reasoning steps, beyond just formal logical rules.
The authors evaluate their approach on standard NLI benchmarks, and show improvements over previous decompositional methods that did not leverage informal logic. The results suggest that the combined use of decomposition and informal logical reasoning can lead to more systematic and effective natural language inference.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the value of incorporating informal logical reasoning into decompositional approaches to natural language inference. The authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the challenge of scaling the decompositional process to more complex natural language phenomena.
One potential concern is the reliance on human-annotated datasets for training and evaluating the informal logic components. While these datasets aim to capture real-world reasoning patterns, there may be biases or inconsistencies that could influence the model's performance.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the interpretability or transparency of the decompositional reasoning process. It would be interesting to see how the intermediate logical inferences can be surfaced and explained to users, to build trust and understanding in the system's decision-making.
Overall, the research represents an important step towards more systematic and human-like natural language understanding. Continued work in this direction, addressing the noted limitations, could lead to significant advancements in the field.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel approach to natural language inference that combines a decompositional reasoning process with principles from informal logic. By breaking down the overall NLI task into a sequence of more granular logical inferences, and leveraging informal logical frameworks to guide and enhance this process, the authors demonstrate improvements over previous decompositional methods.
The findings suggest that integrating informal logic can lead to more systematic and effective natural language understanding, better equipped to handle the nuances and complexities of real-world language use. As the field continues to advance, further research in this direction could yield valuable insights and capabilities for a wide range of language-based applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing Systematic Decompositional Natural Language Inference Using Informal Logic
Nathaniel Weir, Kate Sanders, Orion Weller, Shreya Sharma, Dongwei Jiang, Zhengping Jiang, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Jansen, Peter Clark, Benjamin Van Durme
Recent language models enable new opportunities for structured reasoning with text, such as the construction of intuitive, proof-like textual entailment trees without relying on brittle formal logic. However, progress in this direction has been hampered by a long-standing lack of a clear protocol for determining what valid compositional entailment is. This absence causes noisy datasets and limited performance gains by modern neuro-symbolic engines. To address these problems, we formulate a consistent and theoretically grounded approach to annotating decompositional entailment and evaluate its impact on LLM-based textual inference. We find that our new dataset, RDTE (Recognizing Decompositional Textual Entailment), has a substantially higher internal consistency (+9%) than prior decompositional entailment datasets. We also find that training an RDTE-oriented entailment classifier via knowledge distillation and employing it in an entailment tree reasoning engine significantly improves both accuracy and proof quality, illustrating the practical benefit of this advance for textual inference.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Identification of Entailment and Contradiction Relations between Natural Language Sentences: A Neurosymbolic Approach
Xuyao Feng, Anthony Hunter
Natural language inference (NLI), also known as Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE), is an important aspect of natural language understanding. Most research now uses machine learning and deep learning to perform this task on specific datasets, meaning their solution is not explainable nor explicit. To address the need for an explainable approach to RTE, we propose a novel pipeline that is based on translating text into an Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) graph. For this we use a pre-trained AMR parser. We then translate the AMR graph into propositional logic and use a SAT solver for automated reasoning. In text, often commonsense suggests that an entailment (or contradiction) relationship holds between a premise and a claim, but because different wordings are used, this is not identified from their logical representations. To address this, we introduce relaxation methods to allow replacement or forgetting of some propositions. Our experimental results show this pipeline performs well on four RTE datasets.
Read more5/3/2024
๐งช
0
Scaling Synthetic Logical Reasoning Datasets with Context-Sensitive Declarative Grammars
Damien Sileo
Logical reasoning remains a challenge for natural language processing, but it can be improved by training language models to mimic theorem provers on procedurally generated problems. Previous work used domain-specific proof generation algorithms, which biases reasoning toward specific proof traces and limits auditability and extensibility. We present a simpler and more general declarative framework with flexible context-sensitive rules binding multiple languages (specifically, simplified English and the TPTP theorem-proving language). We construct first-order logic problems by selecting up to 32 premises and one hypothesis. We demonstrate that using semantic constraints during generation and careful English verbalization of predicates enhances logical reasoning without hurting natural English tasks. We use relatively small DeBERTa-v3 models to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on the FOLIO human-authored logic dataset, surpassing GPT-4 in accuracy with or without an external solver by 12%.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Timeline-based Sentence Decomposition with In-Context Learning for Temporal Fact Extraction
Jianhao Chen, Haoyuan Ouyang, Junyang Ren, Wentao Ding, Wei Hu, Yuzhong Qu
Facts extraction is pivotal for constructing knowledge graphs. Recently, the increasing demand for temporal facts in downstream tasks has led to the emergence of the task of temporal fact extraction. In this paper, we specifically address the extraction of temporal facts from natural language text. Previous studies fail to handle the challenge of establishing time-to-fact correspondences in complex sentences. To overcome this hurdle, we propose a timeline-based sentence decomposition strategy using large language models (LLMs) with in-context learning, ensuring a fine-grained understanding of the timeline associated with various facts. In addition, we evaluate the performance of LLMs for direct temporal fact extraction and get unsatisfactory results. To this end, we introduce TSDRE, a method that incorporates the decomposition capabilities of LLMs into the traditional fine-tuning of smaller pre-trained language models (PLMs). To support the evaluation, we construct ComplexTRED, a complex temporal fact extraction dataset. Our experiments show that TSDRE achieves state-of-the-art results on both HyperRED-Temporal and ComplexTRED datasets.
Read more6/19/2024