EnviroExam: Benchmarking Environmental Science Knowledge of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces EnviroExam, a new benchmark for evaluating the environmental science knowledge of large language models (LLMs).
- The benchmark covers a wide range of topics in environmental science, including climate change, ecology, pollution, and natural resource management.
- The authors use EnviroExam to test the performance of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, and provide insights into their environmental science capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers who wrote this paper have created a new way to test how much large AI language models (like GPT-3 and BERT) know about environmental science. They call this new test "EnviroExam," and it covers topics like climate change, ecosystems, pollution, and managing natural resources.
The goal of EnviroExam is to see how well these powerful language models understand and can apply knowledge about the environment and environmental issues. The researchers used EnviroExam to evaluate the performance of several well-known language models, and the results provide interesting insights into the environmental science capabilities of these AI systems.
This work is important because as language models become more advanced and widely used, it's crucial to understand their strengths and limitations when it comes to real-world knowledge domains like environmental science. The EnviroExam benchmark gives us a way to rigorously assess and compare the environmental expertise of different language models, which can inform how we use and develop these technologies going forward.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the EnviroExam evaluation suite, a new benchmark for assessing the environmental science knowledge of large language models (LLMs). EnviroExam covers a diverse set of topics in the field of environmental science, including climate change, ecology, pollution, and natural resource management.
To construct the benchmark, the authors carefully curated a dataset of over 9,000 multiple-choice and free-response questions from various environmental science exams and educational resources. The questions were then organized into 10 distinct categories, each targeting a specific sub-domain within environmental science.
The authors used EnviroExam to evaluate the performance of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa. The models were tested on their ability to answer the multiple-choice questions correctly, as well as their capacity to generate coherent and factually accurate free-response answers.
The results reveal significant variation in the environmental science capabilities of the tested LLMs. While some models demonstrated strong performance on certain categories, they struggled in others, highlighting the need for more comprehensive environmental knowledge and reasoning skills. The paper provides detailed analyses of the models' strengths, weaknesses, and overall environmental science proficiency.
Critical Analysis
The EnviroExam benchmark represents an important step towards a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental science knowledge possessed by large language models. By covering a diverse range of topics, the authors have created a rigorous evaluation tool that can provide valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of these AI systems.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on multiple-choice and free-response questions, which may not fully capture the nuances of environmental science reasoning and problem-solving. Additionally, the dataset used to construct the benchmark may not be entirely representative of the breadth and complexity of environmental science knowledge, and could benefit from further expansion and diversification.
Furthermore, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms and reasoning processes underlying the LLMs' environmental science performance. A more detailed analysis of the models' internal representations and decision-making processes could shed light on the cognitive and knowledge-based factors that contribute to their environmental proficiency.
Despite these minor caveats, the EnviroExam benchmark represents a significant contribution to the field of AI and environmental science. By providing a standardized evaluation tool, the authors have opened the door for further research and development in this important area, ultimately helping to improve the environmental science capabilities of large language models and their application in real-world contexts.
Conclusion
The EnviroExam benchmark introduced in this paper offers a valuable new tool for assessing the environmental science knowledge of large language models. By testing a diverse range of topics, the researchers have been able to uncover interesting insights into the strengths and weaknesses of prominent LLMs like GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa when it comes to environmental science.
This work is important because as AI systems become more advanced and widely used, it's crucial to understand their capabilities and limitations in key knowledge domains like environmental science. The EnviroExam benchmark provides a rigorous and standardized way to evaluate these capabilities, paving the way for further research and development in this area.
Overall, the EnviroExam benchmark represents a significant contribution to the field of AI and environmental science, and the insights gained from this study can help inform the development of more environmentally-aware and knowledgeable language models that can better support real-world environmental decision-making and problem-solving.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
EnviroExam: Benchmarking Environmental Science Knowledge of Large Language Models
Yu Huang, Liang Guo, Wanqian Guo, Zhe Tao, Yang Lv, Zhihao Sun, Dongfang Zhao
In the field of environmental science, it is crucial to have robust evaluation metrics for large language models to ensure their efficacy and accuracy. We propose EnviroExam, a comprehensive evaluation method designed to assess the knowledge of large language models in the field of environmental science. EnviroExam is based on the curricula of top international universities, covering undergraduate, master's, and doctoral courses, and includes 936 questions across 42 core courses. By conducting 0-shot and 5-shot tests on 31 open-source large language models, EnviroExam reveals the performance differences among these models in the domain of environmental science and provides detailed evaluation standards. The results show that 61.3% of the models passed the 5-shot tests, while 48.39% passed the 0-shot tests. By introducing the coefficient of variation as an indicator, we evaluate the performance of mainstream open-source large language models in environmental science from multiple perspectives, providing effective criteria for selecting and fine-tuning language models in this field. Future research will involve constructing more domain-specific test sets using specialized environmental science textbooks to further enhance the accuracy and specificity of the evaluation.
Read more5/21/2024
0
SciEx: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Scientific Exams with Human Expert Grading and Automatic Grading
Tu Anh Dinh, Carlos Mullov, Leonard Barmann, Zhaolin Li, Danni Liu, Simon Rei{ss}, Jueun Lee, Nathan Lerzer, Fabian Ternava, Jianfeng Gao, Tobias Roddiger, Alexander Waibel, Tamim Asfour, Michael Beigl, Rainer Stiefelhagen, Carsten Dachsbacher, Klemens Bohm, Jan Niehues
With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), it is crucial to have benchmarks which can evaluate the ability of LLMs on different domains. One common use of LLMs is performing tasks on scientific topics, such as writing algorithms, querying databases or giving mathematical proofs. Inspired by the way university students are evaluated on such tasks, in this paper, we propose SciEx - a benchmark consisting of university computer science exam questions, to evaluate LLMs ability on solving scientific tasks. SciEx is (1) multilingual, containing both English and German exams, and (2) multi-modal, containing questions that involve images, and (3) contains various types of freeform questions with different difficulty levels, due to the nature of university exams. We evaluate the performance of various state-of-the-art LLMs on our new benchmark. Since SciEx questions are freeform, it is not straightforward to evaluate LLM performance. Therefore, we provide human expert grading of the LLM outputs on SciEx. We show that the free-form exams in SciEx remain challenging for the current LLMs, where the best LLM only achieves 59.4% exam grade on average. We also provide detailed comparisons between LLM performance and student performance on SciEx. To enable future evaluation of new LLMs, we propose using LLM-as-a-judge to grade the LLM answers on SciEx. Our experiments show that, although they do not perform perfectly on solving the exams, LLMs are decent as graders, achieving 0.948 Pearson correlation with expert grading.
Read more7/15/2024
0
SciKnowEval: Evaluating Multi-level Scientific Knowledge of Large Language Models
Kehua Feng, Keyan Ding, Weijie Wang, Xiang Zhuang, Zeyuan Wang, Ming Qin, Yu Zhao, Jianhua Yao, Qiang Zhang, Huajun Chen
The burgeoning utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) in scientific research necessitates advanced benchmarks capable of evaluating their understanding and application of scientific knowledge comprehensively. To address this need, we introduce the SciKnowEval benchmark, a novel framework that systematically evaluates LLMs across five progressive levels of scientific knowledge: studying extensively, inquiring earnestly, thinking profoundly, discerning clearly, and practicing assiduously. These levels aim to assess the breadth and depth of scientific knowledge in LLMs, including knowledge coverage, inquiry and exploration capabilities, reflection and reasoning abilities, ethic and safety considerations, as well as practice proficiency. Specifically, we take biology and chemistry as the two instances of SciKnowEval and construct a dataset encompassing 50K multi-level scientific problems and solutions. By leveraging this dataset, we benchmark 20 leading open-source and proprietary LLMs using zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies. The results reveal that despite achieving state-of-the-art performance, the proprietary LLMs still have considerable room for improvement, particularly in addressing scientific computations and applications. We anticipate that SciKnowEval will establish a comprehensive standard for benchmarking LLMs in science research and discovery, and promote the development of LLMs that integrate scientific knowledge with strong safety awareness. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/hicai-zju/sciknoweval .
Read more6/14/2024
1
Assessing Large Language Models on Climate Information
Jannis Bulian, Mike S. Schafer, Afra Amini, Heidi Lam, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Ben Gaiarin, Michelle Chen Hubscher, Christian Buck, Niels G. Mede, Markus Leippold, Nadine Strau{ss}
As Large Language Models (LLMs) rise in popularity, it is necessary to assess their capability in critically relevant domains. We present a comprehensive evaluation framework, grounded in science communication research, to assess LLM responses to questions about climate change. Our framework emphasizes both presentational and epistemological adequacy, offering a fine-grained analysis of LLM generations spanning 8 dimensions and 30 issues. Our evaluation task is a real-world example of a growing number of challenging problems where AI can complement and lift human performance. We introduce a novel protocol for scalable oversight that relies on AI Assistance and raters with relevant education. We evaluate several recent LLMs on a set of diverse climate questions. Our results point to a significant gap between surface and epistemological qualities of LLMs in the realm of climate communication.
Read more5/29/2024