Epistemic Uncertainty and Observation Noise with the Neural Tangent Kernel
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the impact of epistemic uncertainty and observation noise on the behavior of the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK).
- The NTK is a powerful tool for analyzing the training and performance of neural networks, but it is sensitive to certain types of uncertainty and noise.
- The authors derive analytical expressions for the NTK under different types of uncertainty and noise, and use these to explore the implications for neural network training and generalization.
Plain English Explanation
The Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) is a mathematical tool that helps us understand how neural networks behave during training. It describes the relationship between the inputs and outputs of a neural network, and how this relationship changes as the network is trained.
However, in the real world, there are often sources of uncertainty and noise that can affect the training and performance of neural networks. For example, we may not be completely sure about the true values of the inputs to the network (epistemic uncertainty), or there may be some random errors in the measurements we use to train the network (observation noise).
In this paper, the authors investigate how these types of uncertainty and noise can impact the behavior of the NTK. They derive mathematical expressions that describe how the NTK changes when there is epistemic uncertainty or observation noise present. These expressions allow them to explore the implications for neural network training and generalization.
The key insights from this work are:
- Epistemic uncertainty and observation noise can have a significant impact on the NTK, and therefore on the training and performance of neural networks.
- The authors provide tools to analyze and quantify these effects, which can help researchers and practitioners better understand the limitations and potential pitfalls of using neural networks in real-world settings.
Technical Explanation
The authors start by deriving analytical expressions for the NTK under different types of uncertainty and noise. Specifically, they consider:
-
Epistemic Uncertainty: This refers to uncertainty about the true values of the inputs to the neural network. The authors show that epistemic uncertainty can lead to a modification of the NTK, which in turn affects the training dynamics and generalization performance of the network.
-
Observation Noise: This refers to random errors in the measurements used to train the neural network. The authors derive the NTK in the presence of observation noise, and show that it can also have a significant impact on the network's behavior.
The authors then use these analytical expressions to explore the implications for neural network training and generalization. For example, they show that epistemic uncertainty can lead to increased training stability and improved generalization, while observation noise can have the opposite effect.
The paper also discusses some caveats and limitations of this work. For instance, the authors note that the analysis assumes certain simplifying assumptions, such as Gaussian distributions for the uncertainty and noise. They acknowledge that in more complex, real-world scenarios, the effects may be more nuanced and difficult to analyze.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper provides valuable insights into the impact of epistemic uncertainty and observation noise on the behavior of neural networks through the lens of the NTK. The authors' analytical expressions offer a helpful framework for understanding and quantifying these effects, which can be important in real-world applications of machine learning.
One potential limitation of this work is the reliance on certain simplifying assumptions, such as Gaussian distributions for the uncertainty and noise. In practice, the distributions may be more complex, and the effects may not be as straightforward to analyze. Additionally, the paper does not explore the implications of these findings for specific neural network architectures or applications, which could be an interesting avenue for future research.
Moreover, the paper does not discuss potential mitigation strategies or techniques that could be used to address the issues raised, such as the use of robust training methods or uncertainty-aware neural network models. Exploring these aspects could further enhance the practical relevance of this work.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of how epistemic uncertainty and observation noise can impact the behavior of neural networks through the lens of the NTK. The analytical expressions derived by the authors provide a valuable tool for analyzing these effects, which can be crucial for the successful deployment of neural networks in real-world applications.
While the paper acknowledges certain limitations and caveats, it lays the groundwork for further research in this area. Exploring the implications for specific neural network architectures, investigating more complex noise and uncertainty distributions, and developing mitigation strategies could all be fruitful avenues for future work.
Overall, this paper offers a thought-provoking and technically rigorous exploration of an important topic in the field of machine learning, with potential implications for both the theoretical understanding and practical application of neural networks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Epistemic Uncertainty and Observation Noise with the Neural Tangent Kernel
Sergio Calvo-Ordo~nez, Konstantina Palla, Kamil Ciosek
Recent work has shown that training wide neural networks with gradient descent is formally equivalent to computing the mean of the posterior distribution in a Gaussian Process (GP) with the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) as the prior covariance and zero aleatoric noise parencite{jacot2018neural}. In this paper, we extend this framework in two ways. First, we show how to deal with non-zero aleatoric noise. Second, we derive an estimator for the posterior covariance, giving us a handle on epistemic uncertainty. Our proposed approach integrates seamlessly with standard training pipelines, as it involves training a small number of additional predictors using gradient descent on a mean squared error loss. We demonstrate the proof-of-concept of our method through empirical evaluation on synthetic regression.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernels
Philipp Misof, Pan Kessel, Jan E. Gerken
Equivariant neural networks have in recent years become an important technique for guiding architecture selection for neural networks with many applications in domains ranging from medical image analysis to quantum chemistry. In particular, as the most general linear equivariant layers with respect to the regular representation, group convolutions have been highly impactful in numerous applications. Although equivariant architectures have been studied extensively, much less is known about the training dynamics of equivariant neural networks. Concurrently, neural tangent kernels (NTKs) have emerged as a powerful tool to analytically understand the training dynamics of wide neural networks. In this work, we combine these two fields for the first time by giving explicit expressions for NTKs of group convolutional neural networks. In numerical experiments, we demonstrate superior performance for equivariant NTKs over non-equivariant NTKs on a classification task for medical images.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Wiener Chaos in Kernel Regression: Towards Untangling Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty
T. Faulwasser, O. Molodchyk
Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a versatile method that enables different approaches towards learning for dynamics and control. Gaussianity assumptions appear in two dimensions in GPs: The positive semi-definite kernel of the underlying reproducing kernel Hilbert space is used to construct the co-variance of a Gaussian distribution over functions, while measurement noise (i.e. data corruption) is usually modeled as i.i.d. additive Gaussians. In this note, we generalize the setting and consider kernel ridge regression with additive i.i.d. non-Gaussian measurement noise. To apply the usual kernel trick, we rely on the representation of the uncertainty via polynomial chaos expansions, which are series expansions for random variables of finite variance introduced by Norbert Wiener. We derive and discuss the analytic $mathcal{L}^2$ solution to the arising Wiener kernel regression. Considering a polynomial dynamic system as a numerical example, we show that our approach allows us to distinguish the uncertainty that stems from the noise in the data samples from the total uncertainty encoded in the GP posterior distribution.
Read more9/14/2024
🧠
0
The Positivity of the Neural Tangent Kernel
Lu'is Carvalho, Jo~ao L. Costa, Jos'e Mour~ao, Gonc{c}alo Oliveira
The Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) has emerged as a fundamental concept in the study of wide Neural Networks. In particular, it is known that the positivity of the NTK is directly related to the memorization capacity of sufficiently wide networks, i.e., to the possibility of reaching zero loss in training, via gradient descent. Here we will improve on previous works and obtain a sharp result concerning the positivity of the NTK of feedforward networks of any depth. More precisely, we will show that, for any non-polynomial activation function, the NTK is strictly positive definite. Our results are based on a novel characterization of polynomial functions which is of independent interest.
Read more4/22/2024