Equilibria in Two-Stage Facility Location with Atomic Clients
0
🔄
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores equilibria in a two-stage facility location problem with strategic clients.
- It analyzes the properties of stable outcomes (Nash equilibria) in this setting and provides insights into the players' behavior and the resulting social welfare.
- The research builds on prior work in strategic facility location with clients that minimize total distance and facility location games beyond single-peakedness.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a situation where there are facilities (like stores or hospitals) that need to be located, and clients (like customers or patients) who can choose which facility to use. The clients are "strategic," meaning they will choose the facility that is best for them, rather than just going to the nearest one.
The two-stage aspect refers to the fact that first, the facility locations are chosen, and then the clients decide which facility to use. The researchers analyze what the "stable" outcomes of this process will be - meaning, the situations where no one has an incentive to change their choice.
The key insights are about how the clients' strategic behavior affects the final locations of the facilities and the overall "social welfare" (how good the outcome is for everyone). The researchers find that there can be multiple stable outcomes, and explore the properties of these different possibilities.
This work builds on previous studies of strategic facility location, where clients try to minimize their total distance traveled, and facility location games with more complex client preferences (beyond just preferring the closest facility).
Technical Explanation
The paper studies a two-stage facility location game with strategic clients. In the first stage, facilities are located, and in the second stage, clients choose which facility to patronize based on their own preferences.
The researchers define a client's cost as the sum of the distance to their assigned facility and a "disutility" term that captures their dissatisfaction with the facility. Clients aim to minimize their own cost, leading to a strategic facility location problem.
The authors show that this game can have multiple Nash equilibria, each with different facility locations and client assignments. They analyze the properties of these equilibria, including the total social cost, the distribution of costs among clients, and the concentration of facilities.
Interestingly, the researchers find that the equilibria need not satisfy single-peakedness, a common assumption in facility location games. This adds complexity to the analysis and computation of the equilibria.
The paper provides a thorough theoretical treatment of the problem, characterizing the existence, uniqueness, and properties of the equilibria in this two-stage facility location game with strategic clients.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the two-stage facility location problem with strategic clients. The researchers carefully define the game, establish the existence and properties of Nash equilibria, and explore the implications for social welfare.
One potential limitation is the assumption of a specific client cost function, which includes both distance and a disutility term. While this captures an important aspect of client preferences, it may not fully reflect the diversity of real-world client behavior.
Additionally, the computation of the equilibria is not addressed in depth. The paper focuses on the theoretical analysis, but does not provide efficient algorithms for finding the equilibria in practice. This could be an important area for future research.
Another aspect that could be explored further is the dynamic aspects of the game, such as how the facility locations and client assignments might evolve over time as players adjust their strategies. The current analysis is static, but a more dynamic perspective could yield additional insights.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of strategic behavior in facility location problems. The findings challenge some common assumptions in the literature and provide a foundation for further investigation of this important class of economic games.
Conclusion
This paper presents a detailed analysis of equilibria in a two-stage facility location problem with strategic clients. The researchers characterize the properties of the stable outcomes (Nash equilibria) and explore their implications for social welfare.
The key insights include the potential for multiple equilibria, the lack of single-peakedness in client preferences, and the complex interplay between facility locations and client assignments. These findings build on and extend previous work in strategic facility location and facility location games with more sophisticated client behavior.
While the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis, the results have practical relevance for real-world facility location decisions, where the strategic considerations of clients can have a significant impact on the final outcomes. Further research on the computational aspects and dynamic aspects of the problem could yield additional insights and inform the design of better facility location policies and mechanisms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔄
0
Equilibria in Two-Stage Facility Location with Atomic Clients
Simon Krogmann, Pascal Lenzner, Alexander Skopalik, Marc Uetz, Marnix C. Vos
We consider competitive facility location as a two-stage multi-agent system with two types of clients. For a given host graph with weighted clients on the vertices, first facility agents strategically select vertices for opening their facilities. Then, the clients strategically select which of the opened facilities in their neighborhood to patronize. Facilities want to attract as much client weight as possible, clients want to minimize congestion on the chosen facility. All recently studied versions of this model assume that clients can split their weight strategically. We consider clients with unsplittable weights but allow mixed strategies. So clients may randomize over which facility to patronize. Besides modeling a natural client behavior, this subtle change yields drastic changes, e.g., for a given facility placement, qualitatively different client equilibria are possible. As our main result, we show that pure subgame perfect equilibria always exist if all client weights are identical. For this, we use a novel potential function argument, employing a hierarchical classification of the clients and sophisticated rounding in each step. In contrast, for non-identical clients, we show that deciding the existence of even approximately stable states is computationally intractable. On the positive side, we give a tight bound of $2$ on the price of anarchy which implies high social welfare of equilibria, if they exist.
Read more7/10/2024
🌐
0
Two-Stage Facility Location Games with Strategic Clients and Facilities
Simon Krogmann, Pascal Lenzner, Louise Molitor, Alexander Skopalik
We consider non-cooperative facility location games where both facilities and clients act strategically and heavily influence each other. This contrasts established game-theoretic facility location models with non-strategic clients that simply select the closest opened facility. In our model, every facility location has a set of attracted clients and each client has a set of shopping locations and a weight that corresponds to her spending capacity. Facility agents selfishly select a location for opening their facility to maximize the attracted total spending capacity, whereas clients strategically decide how to distribute their spending capacity among the opened facilities in their shopping range. We focus on a natural client behavior similar to classical load balancing: our selfish clients aim for a distribution that minimizes their maximum waiting times for getting serviced, where a facility's waiting time corresponds to its total attracted client weight. We show that subgame perfect equilibria exist and give almost tight constant bounds on the Price of Anarchy and the Price of Stability, which even hold for a broader class of games with arbitrary client behavior. Since facilities and clients influence each other, it is crucial for the facilities to anticipate the selfish clients' behavior when selecting their location. For this, we provide an efficient algorithm that also implies an efficient check for equilibrium. Finally, we show that computing a socially optimal facility placement is NP-hard and that this result holds for all feasible client weight distributions.
Read more6/17/2024
💬
0
Strategic Facility Location with Clients that Minimize Total Waiting Time
Simon Krogmann, Pascal Lenzner, Alexander Skopalik
We study a non-cooperative two-sided facility location game in which facilities and clients behave strategically. This is in contrast to many other facility location games in which clients simply visit their closest facility. Facility agents select a location on a graph to open a facility to attract as much purchasing power as possible, while client agents choose which facilities to patronize by strategically distributing their purchasing power in order to minimize their total waiting time. Here, the waiting time of a facility depends on its received total purchasing power. We show that our client stage is an atomic splittable congestion game, which implies existence, uniqueness and efficient computation of a client equilibrium. Therefore, facility agents can efficiently predict client behavior and make strategic decisions accordingly. Despite that, we prove that subgame perfect equilibria do not exist in all instances of this game and that their existence is NP-hard to decide. On the positive side, we provide a simple and efficient algorithm to compute 3-approximate subgame perfect equilibria.
Read more6/14/2024
📈
0
Facility Location Games Beyond Single-Peakedness: the Entrance Fee Model
Mengfan Ma, Mingyu Xiao, Tian Bai, Bakh Khoussainov
The facility location game has been studied extensively in mechanism design. In the classical model, each agent's cost is solely determined by her distance to the nearest facility. In this paper, we introduce a novel model where each facility charges an entrance fee. Thus, the cost of each agent is determined by both the distance to the facility and the entrance fee of the facility. In our model, the entrance fee function is allowed to be an arbitrary function, causing agents' preferences may no longer be single-peaked anymore: This departure from the classical model introduces additional challenges. We systematically delve into the intricacies of the model, designing strategyproof mechanisms with favorable approximation ratios. Additionally, we complement these ratios with nearly-tight impossibility results. Specifically, for one-facility and two-facility games, we provide upper and lower bounds for the approximation ratios given by deterministic and randomized mechanisms with respect to utilitarian and egalitarian objectives.
Read more4/16/2024