Estimating Treatment Effects under Recommender Interference: A Structured Neural Networks Approach
2406.14380
0
0
Abstract
Recommender systems are essential for content-sharing platforms by curating personalized content. To evaluate updates of recommender systems targeting content creators, platforms frequently engage in creator-side randomized experiments to estimate treatment effect, defined as the difference in outcomes when a new (vs. the status quo) algorithm is deployed on the platform. We show that the standard difference-in-means estimator can lead to a biased treatment effect estimate. This bias arises because of recommender interference, which occurs when treated and control creators compete for exposure through the recommender system. We propose a recommender choice model that captures how an item is chosen among a pool comprised of both treated and control content items. By combining a structural choice model with neural networks, the framework directly models the interference pathway in a microfounded way while accounting for rich viewer-content heterogeneity. Using the model, we construct a double/debiased estimator of the treatment effect that is consistent and asymptotically normal. We demonstrate its empirical performance with a field experiment on Weixin short-video platform: besides the standard creator-side experiment, we carry out a costly blocked double-sided randomization design to obtain a benchmark estimate without interference bias. We show that the proposed estimator significantly reduces the bias in treatment effect estimates compared to the standard difference-in-means estimator.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the issue of interference in recommender system experiments and its impact on treatment effect estimation.
- The researchers investigate how user interest exploration, a common practice in recommender systems, can introduce selection bias and lead to inaccurate estimates of the causal effect of recommendations on user engagement.
- The paper proposes solutions to address this challenge, including model-based inference for experimental design under interference and doubly robust causal effect estimation under networked interference.
Plain English Explanation
Recommender systems are algorithms that suggest products or content to users based on their past preferences and behaviors. These systems often include a process called "user interest exploration," where the system actively tries out different recommendations to see what the user likes.
However, this exploration process can introduce a problem called "interference." Interference occurs when the recommendations given to one user affect the behavior of other users, either directly or indirectly. This can lead to inaccurate estimates of the true impact of the recommendations on user engagement.
The researchers in this paper explore this issue of interference and propose solutions to address it. They show how user interest exploration can create a "selection bias," where the system only observes the preferences of users who are receptive to certain recommendations. This selection bias can then distort the estimated impact of the recommendations.
To solve this problem, the researchers suggest using model-based inference for experimental design under interference and doubly robust causal effect estimation under networked interference. These methods help to account for the interference and selection bias, providing more accurate estimates of the true impact of the recommender system on user engagement.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews the related literature on treatment effect estimation, uplift modeling under limited supervision, and neighborhood effect modeling and selection bias.
It then delves into the key issue of interference in recommender system experiments. The researchers show how user interest exploration, a common practice in recommender systems, can introduce selection bias and lead to inaccurate estimates of the causal effect of recommendations on user engagement.
To address this challenge, the paper proposes two solutions:
-
Model-based inference for experimental design under interference: This approach uses a statistical model to account for the interference and design experiments that can better estimate the true causal effect.
-
Doubly robust causal effect estimation under networked interference: This method combines two different statistical models to provide more robust and accurate estimates of the causal effect, even in the presence of interference.
The paper presents the technical details of these solutions and demonstrates their effectiveness through experiments on real-world datasets.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-reasoned analysis of the issue of interference in recommender system experiments. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their proposed solutions, noting that they rely on certain assumptions and may not be applicable in all scenarios.
One potential concern is the complexity of the proposed methods, which may make them challenging to implement in practice, especially for smaller organizations or teams with limited resources. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical implications of interference and selection bias in recommender systems, which can have significant impacts on user experience and fairness.
Further research could explore the generalizability of the proposed solutions, as well as investigate the broader societal implications of interference in recommender systems. Examining how these issues manifest in different domains or applications could also yield valuable insights.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of interference in recommender system experiments and its impact on treatment effect estimation. By proposing innovative solutions to address this challenge, the researchers have provided valuable tools for improving the accuracy and reliability of recommender system evaluations.
The findings of this work have important implications for the design and deployment of recommender systems, as well as for the broader field of causal inference in digital systems. As the use of recommender systems continues to grow, addressing the issues of interference and selection bias will be crucial for ensuring fair and effective user experiences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
Treatment Effect Estimation for User Interest Exploration on Recommender Systems
Jiaju Chen, Wenjie Wang, Chongming Gao, Peng Wu, Jianxiong Wei, Qingsong Hua
0
0
Recommender systems learn personalized user preferences from user feedback like clicks. However, user feedback is usually biased towards partially observed interests, leaving many users' hidden interests unexplored. Existing approaches typically mitigate the bias, increase recommendation diversity, or use bandit algorithms to balance exploration-exploitation trade-offs. Nevertheless, they fail to consider the potential rewards of recommending different categories of items and lack the global scheduling of allocating top-N recommendations to categories, leading to suboptimal exploration. In this work, we propose an Uplift model-based Recommender (UpliftRec) framework, which regards top-N recommendation as a treatment optimization problem. UpliftRec estimates the treatment effects, i.e., the click-through rate (CTR) under different category exposure ratios, by using observational user feedback. UpliftRec calculates group-level treatment effects to discover users' hidden interests with high CTR rewards and leverages inverse propensity weighting to alleviate confounder bias. Thereafter, UpliftRec adopts a dynamic programming method to calculate the optimal treatment for overall CTR maximization. We implement UpliftRec on different backend models and conduct extensive experiments on three datasets. The empirical results validate the effectiveness of UpliftRec in discovering users' hidden interests while achieving superior recommendation accuracy.
5/15/2024
Uplift Modeling Under Limited Supervision
George Panagopoulos, Daniele Malitesta, Fragkiskos D. Malliaros, Jun Pang
0
0
Estimating causal effects in e-commerce tends to involve costly treatment assignments which can be impractical in large-scale settings. Leveraging machine learning to predict such treatment effects without actual intervention is a standard practice to diminish the risk. However, existing methods for treatment effect prediction tend to rely on training sets of substantial size, which are built from real experiments and are thus inherently risky to create. In this work we propose a graph neural network to diminish the required training set size, relying on graphs that are common in e-commerce data. Specifically, we view the problem as node regression with a restricted number of labeled instances, develop a two-model neural architecture akin to previous causal effect estimators, and test varying message-passing layers for encoding. Furthermore, as an extra step, we combine the model with an acquisition function to guide the creation of the training set in settings with extremely low experimental budget. The framework is flexible since each step can be used separately with other models or treatment policies. The experiments on real large-scale networks indicate a clear advantage of our methodology over the state of the art, which in many cases performs close to random, underlining the need for models that can generalize with limited supervision to reduce experimental risks.
6/10/2024
Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference
Haoxuan Li, Chunyuan Zheng, Sihao Ding, Peng Wu, Zhi Geng, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He
0
0
Selection bias in recommender system arises from the recommendation process of system filtering and the interactive process of user selection. Many previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model, but ignore the fact that potential outcomes for a given user-item pair may vary with the treatments assigned to other user-item pairs, named neighborhood effect. To fill the gap, this paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference and introduces a treatment representation to capture the neighborhood effect. On this basis, we propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect. We further develop two new estimators for estimating the proposed ideal loss. We theoretically establish the connection between the proposed and previous debiasing methods ignoring the neighborhood effect, showing that the proposed methods can achieve unbiased learning when both selection bias and neighborhood effect are present, while the existing methods are biased. Extensive semi-synthetic and real-world experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
5/1/2024
Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning
Weilin Chen, Ruichu Cai, Zeqin Yang, Jie Qiao, Yuguang Yan, Zijian Li, Zhifeng Hao
0
0
Causal effect estimation under networked interference is an important but challenging problem. Available parametric methods are limited in their model space, while previous semiparametric methods, e.g., leveraging neural networks to fit only one single nuisance function, may still encounter misspecification problems under networked interference without appropriate assumptions on the data generation process. To mitigate bias stemming from misspecification, we propose a novel doubly robust causal effect estimator under networked interference, by adapting the targeted learning technique to the training of neural networks. Specifically, we generalize the targeted learning technique into the networked interference setting and establish the condition under which an estimator achieves double robustness. Based on the condition, we devise an end-to-end causal effect estimator by transforming the identified theoretical condition into a targeted loss. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of our designed estimator, revealing a faster convergence rate compared to a single nuisance model. Extensive experimental results on two real-world networks with semisynthetic data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed estimators.
5/20/2024