Ethical AI Governance: Methods for Evaluating Trustworthy AI
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines ethical governance methods for evaluating trustworthy AI systems
- Proposes a framework for assessing AI trustworthiness across key dimensions
- Highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to ensuring ethical and responsible AI development
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to evaluate the trustworthiness of AI systems. It recognizes that as AI becomes more advanced and widely adopted, it's crucial to ensure these technologies are developed and used in an ethical and responsible manner.
The researchers present a framework for assessing AI trustworthiness across several key dimensions, such as transparency, accountability, and fairness. This comprehensive approach aims to provide a structured way for organizations to evaluate the trustworthiness of their AI systems and identify areas for improvement.
The paper emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to ethical AI governance that goes beyond technical considerations and addresses the broader societal impacts of AI. By establishing robust frameworks for assessing trustworthiness, the researchers hope to help organizations develop AI systems that are aligned with ethical principles and can be trusted by the public.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for evaluating the trustworthiness of AI systems, which includes the following key dimensions:
- Transparency: Ensuring the AI system's decision-making process is understandable and explainable to both developers and end-users.
- Accountability: Establishing clear lines of responsibility and mechanisms for holding AI systems and their developers accountable for their actions and impacts.
- Fairness: Ensuring AI systems do not exhibit biases or discriminate against individuals or groups based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or age.
- Robustness: Ensuring AI systems are reliable, secure, and able to handle a range of input conditions without unexpected or undesirable behaviors.
- Privacy: Protecting the privacy and personal data of individuals who interact with or are impacted by the AI system.
- Societal Impact: Considering the broader societal implications of AI systems, including their effects on employment, social welfare, and the environment.
The researchers argue that a comprehensive assessment of these dimensions is necessary to ensure the development of trustworthy and ethical AI systems that can be reliably deployed in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-rounded framework for evaluating the trustworthiness of AI systems, covering a range of important ethical and technical considerations. By addressing multiple dimensions, the researchers acknowledge the complexity of ensuring responsible AI development and deployment.
However, the paper does not provide detailed guidance on how to practically implement this framework or address potential challenges that organizations may face. For example, the paper does not delve into the specific methods or metrics that could be used to assess fairness or societal impact, which can be highly context-dependent and difficult to quantify.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs or conflicts that may arise between the different trustworthiness dimensions. For instance, efforts to maximize transparency and explainability may sometimes conflict with the need to protect individual privacy or maintain system robustness.
Further research and practical case studies would be valuable to help refine and operationalize this framework, as well as to understand the practical challenges and potential solutions for implementing trustworthy AI systems in real-world settings.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the trustworthiness of AI systems, addressing key dimensions such as transparency, accountability, fairness, and societal impact. The researchers emphasize the importance of a holistic approach to ethical AI governance, recognizing that the development of trustworthy AI systems requires considering a broad range of technical and societal factors.
By establishing a structured way to assess AI trustworthiness, the paper aims to help organizations create AI systems that are aligned with ethical principles and can be trusted by the public. As AI becomes increasingly pervasive, this type of framework will be crucial for ensuring the responsible and ethical development and deployment of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Ethical AI Governance: Methods for Evaluating Trustworthy AI
Louise McCormack, Malika Bendechache
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) integrates ethics that align with human values, looking at their influence on AI behaviour and decision-making. Primarily dependent on self-assessment, TAI evaluation aims to ensure ethical standards and safety in AI development and usage. This paper reviews the current TAI evaluation methods in the literature and offers a classification, contributing to understanding self-assessment methods in this field.
Read more9/14/2024
0
Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges
Maria Teresa Baldassarre, Domenico Gigante, Marcos Kalinowski, Azzurra Ragone, Sara Tibid`o
Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.
Read more7/18/2024
0
The Journey to Trustworthy AI- Part 1: Pursuit of Pragmatic Frameworks
Mohamad M Nasr-Azadani, Jean-Luc Chatelain
This paper reviews Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) and its various definitions. Considering the principles respected in any society, TAI is often characterized by a few attributes, some of which have led to confusion in regulatory or engineering contexts. We argue against using terms such as Responsible or Ethical AI as substitutes for TAI. And to help clarify any confusion, we suggest leaving them behind. Given the subjectivity and complexity inherent in TAI, developing a universal framework is deemed infeasible. Instead, we advocate for approaches centered on addressing key attributes and properties such as fairness, bias, risk, security, explainability, and reliability. We examine the ongoing regulatory landscape, with a focus on initiatives in the EU, China, and the USA. We recognize that differences in AI regulations based on geopolitical and geographical reasons pose an additional challenge for multinational companies. We identify risk as a core factor in AI regulation and TAI. For example, as outlined in the EU-AI Act, organizations must gauge the risk level of their AI products to act accordingly (or risk hefty fines). We compare modalities of TAI implementation and how multiple cross-functional teams are engaged in the overall process. Thus, a brute force approach for enacting TAI renders its efficiency and agility, moot. To address this, we introduce our framework Set-Formalize-Measure-Act (SFMA). Our solution highlights the importance of transforming TAI-aware metrics, drivers of TAI, stakeholders, and business/legal requirements into actual benchmarks or tests. Finally, over-regulation driven by panic of powerful AI models can, in fact, harm TAI too. Based on GitHub user-activity data, in 2023, AI open-source projects rose to top projects by contributor account. Enabling innovation in TAI hinges on the independent contributions of the open-source community.
Read more4/9/2024
0
Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems
Farzaneh Dehghani (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Mahsa Dibaji (Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Fahim Anzum (Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Lily Dey (Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Alican Basdemir (Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Sayeh Bayat (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Jean-Christophe Boucher (Department of Political Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Steve Drew (Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Sarah Elaine Eaton (Werklund School of Education, Specialization, Leadership, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Richard Frayne (Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Gouri Ginde (Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Ashley Harris (Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Yani Ioannou (Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Catherine Lebel (Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), John Lysack (Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Leslie Salgado Arzuaga (Department of Communication, Media, and Film, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Emma Stanley (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Roberto Souza (Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Ronnie de Souza Santos (Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Lana Wells (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Tyler Williamson (Centre for Health Informatics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Matthias Wilms (Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Zaman Wahid (Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Mark Ungrin (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Marina Gavrilova (Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada), Mariana Bento (Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has paved the way for revolutionary decision-making processes, which if harnessed appropriately, can contribute to advancements in various sectors, from healthcare to economics. However, its black box nature presents significant ethical challenges related to bias and transparency. AI applications are hugely impacted by biases, presenting inconsistent and unreliable findings, leading to significant costs and consequences, highlighting and perpetuating inequalities and unequal access to resources. Hence, developing safe, reliable, ethical, and Trustworthy AI systems is essential. Our team of researchers working with Trustworthy and Responsible AI, part of the Transdisciplinary Scholarship Initiative within the University of Calgary, conducts research on Trustworthy and Responsible AI, including fairness, bias mitigation, reproducibility, generalization, interpretability, and authenticity. In this paper, we review and discuss the intricacies of AI biases, definitions, methods of detection and mitigation, and metrics for evaluating bias. We also discuss open challenges with regard to the trustworthiness and widespread application of AI across diverse domains of human-centric decision making, as well as guidelines to foster Responsible and Trustworthy AI models.
Read more9/4/2024