Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges

Read original: arXiv:2407.12135 - Published 7/18/2024 by Maria Teresa Baldassarre, Domenico Gigante, Marcos Kalinowski, Azzurra Ragone, Sara Tibid`o
Total Score

0

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the practical needs and challenges faced by AI practitioners in implementing trustworthy AI systems.
  • It uses a mixed-method research approach, combining a survey and semi-structured interviews, to gain insights from a diverse group of AI practitioners.
  • The study aims to identify the key requirements, obstacles, and potential solutions for ensuring the trustworthiness of AI systems in real-world applications.

Plain English Explanation

This research paper investigates the practical issues that AI developers and users face when trying to make AI systems that are reliable, fair, and transparent. The researchers used a combination of an online survey and in-depth interviews to understand the needs and challenges of a wide range of AI practitioners, from researchers to business leaders.

The goal was to identify the essential elements required for "trustworthy AI" - AI that behaves in a way that people can rely on and have confidence in. This is an important issue as AI is becoming more prevalent in many areas of our lives, from healthcare to finance to social services. If AI systems are not trustworthy, they could lead to harmful or biased decisions that negatively impact people.

By directly engaging with AI practitioners, the researchers hoped to uncover the real-world problems they encounter when trying to deploy trustworthy AI, as well as potential solutions. This kind of practical, user-centered research is valuable for guiding the development of AI systems that are safe, ethical, and beneficial to society.

Technical Explanation

The study employed a mixed-method research approach, combining an online survey and semi-structured interviews. The survey gathered quantitative data from 211 AI practitioners on their perspectives and experiences regarding trustworthy AI. The interviews then provided more in-depth, qualitative insights from 15 participants with diverse backgrounds in AI development and deployment.

The survey and interviews explored several key areas related to trustworthy AI, such as:

  • The most important requirements for trustworthy AI systems
  • The primary challenges faced in achieving trustworthy AI
  • The most useful tools, methods, and frameworks for trustworthy AI
  • The organizational and cultural factors that enable or hinder trustworthy AI

The researchers then analyzed the data using a combination of statistical analysis and thematic coding to identify the dominant themes and patterns. This allowed them to develop a comprehensive understanding of the practical needs and obstacles encountered by AI practitioners in the real world.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable, user-centered insights that can help guide the development of more trustworthy and responsible AI systems. By directly engaging with AI practitioners, the researchers were able to uncover challenges and requirements that may not have been apparent from a more theoretical or top-down perspective.

However, the sample size, particularly for the interviews, was relatively small. While the participants represented a diverse range of roles and backgrounds, a larger and more representative sample could have provided even richer and more generalizable findings. Additionally, the study was conducted primarily in North America, so the results may not fully reflect the experiences of AI practitioners in other regions.

Furthermore, the paper acknowledges that the research only represents a snapshot in time, and the needs and challenges of trustworthy AI are likely to evolve rapidly as the technology and its applications continue to advance. Ongoing, longitudinal research will be important for tracking these changes and ensuring that AI development keeps pace with the needs and concerns of practitioners and end-users.

Conclusion

This research provides important insights into the practical realities of implementing trustworthy AI systems from the perspective of AI practitioners. By identifying the key requirements, obstacles, and potential solutions, the study can help inform the development of more robust and responsible AI frameworks and practices.

As AI becomes increasingly integrated into various aspects of our lives, ensuring the trustworthiness of these systems is crucial for maintaining public confidence and realizing the full benefits of the technology. The findings of this paper can serve as a valuable resource for AI researchers, developers, and policymakers as they work to address the challenges of trustworthy AI in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges
Total Score

0

Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges

Maria Teresa Baldassarre, Domenico Gigante, Marcos Kalinowski, Azzurra Ragone, Sara Tibid`o

Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.

Read more

7/18/2024

The Journey to Trustworthy AI- Part 1: Pursuit of Pragmatic Frameworks
Total Score

0

The Journey to Trustworthy AI- Part 1: Pursuit of Pragmatic Frameworks

Mohamad M Nasr-Azadani, Jean-Luc Chatelain

This paper reviews Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) and its various definitions. Considering the principles respected in any society, TAI is often characterized by a few attributes, some of which have led to confusion in regulatory or engineering contexts. We argue against using terms such as Responsible or Ethical AI as substitutes for TAI. And to help clarify any confusion, we suggest leaving them behind. Given the subjectivity and complexity inherent in TAI, developing a universal framework is deemed infeasible. Instead, we advocate for approaches centered on addressing key attributes and properties such as fairness, bias, risk, security, explainability, and reliability. We examine the ongoing regulatory landscape, with a focus on initiatives in the EU, China, and the USA. We recognize that differences in AI regulations based on geopolitical and geographical reasons pose an additional challenge for multinational companies. We identify risk as a core factor in AI regulation and TAI. For example, as outlined in the EU-AI Act, organizations must gauge the risk level of their AI products to act accordingly (or risk hefty fines). We compare modalities of TAI implementation and how multiple cross-functional teams are engaged in the overall process. Thus, a brute force approach for enacting TAI renders its efficiency and agility, moot. To address this, we introduce our framework Set-Formalize-Measure-Act (SFMA). Our solution highlights the importance of transforming TAI-aware metrics, drivers of TAI, stakeholders, and business/legal requirements into actual benchmarks or tests. Finally, over-regulation driven by panic of powerful AI models can, in fact, harm TAI too. Based on GitHub user-activity data, in 2023, AI open-source projects rose to top projects by contributor account. Enabling innovation in TAI hinges on the independent contributions of the open-source community.

Read more

4/9/2024

Ethical AI Governance: Methods for Evaluating Trustworthy AI
Total Score

0

Ethical AI Governance: Methods for Evaluating Trustworthy AI

Louise McCormack, Malika Bendechache

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) integrates ethics that align with human values, looking at their influence on AI behaviour and decision-making. Primarily dependent on self-assessment, TAI evaluation aims to ensure ethical standards and safety in AI development and usage. This paper reviews the current TAI evaluation methods in the literature and offers a classification, contributing to understanding self-assessment methods in this field.

Read more

9/14/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Catalog of General Ethical Requirements for AI Certification

Nicholas Kluge Corr^ea, Julia Maria Monig

This whitepaper offers normative and practical guidance for developers of artificial intelligence (AI) systems to achieve Trustworthy AI. In it, we present overall ethical requirements and six ethical principles with value-specific recommendations for tools to implement these principles into technology. Our value-specific recommendations address the principles of fairness, privacy and data protection, safety and robustness, sustainability, transparency and explainability and truthfulness. For each principle, we also present examples of criteria for risk assessment and categorization of AI systems and applications in line with the categories of the European Union (EU) AI Act. Our work is aimed at stakeholders who can take it as a potential blueprint to fulfill minimum ethical requirements for trustworthy AI and AI Certification.

Read more

8/23/2024