Ethical Framework for Responsible Foundational Models in Medical Imaging

Read original: arXiv:2406.11868 - Published 6/19/2024 by Abhijit Das, Debesh Jha, Jasmer Sanjotra, Onkar Susladkar, Suramyaa Sarkar, Ashish Rauniyar, Nikhil Tomar, Vanshali Sharma, Ulas Bagci
Total Score

0

🐍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Foundational models (FMs) have significant potential to transform medical imaging, but their deployment in real-world clinical settings requires extensive ethical considerations.
  • This paper aims to highlight the ethical concerns related to FMs and propose a framework to guide their responsible development and implementation within medicine.
  • The paper examines ethical issues such as patient data privacy, bias mitigation, algorithmic transparency, explainability, and accountability.
  • The proposed framework is designed to prioritize patient welfare, mitigate potential risks, and foster trust in AI-assisted healthcare.

Plain English Explanation

Foundational models (FMs) are a powerful type of artificial intelligence that have the potential to revolutionize medical imaging. These models can be trained on vast amounts of data to perform a wide range of tasks, such as analyzing medical scans or assisting doctors in making diagnoses.

However, before these FMs can be used in real-world clinical settings, there are important ethical considerations that need to be addressed. The researchers in this paper have identified several key ethical concerns, such as ensuring the privacy of patient data, making sure the models are not biased, and ensuring that the decision-making process of the models is transparent and accountable.

The researchers have proposed a framework to guide the responsible development and implementation of FMs in medicine. This framework is designed to prioritize the well-being of patients, mitigate potential risks, and build trust in the use of AI-assisted healthcare.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the ethical considerations surrounding the deployment of foundational models (FMs) in medical imaging. The researchers examine a range of ethical issues, including:

The researchers propose a comprehensive framework to guide the responsible development and deployment of FMs in clinical settings. This framework is designed to prioritize patient welfare, mitigate potential risks, and foster trust in the use of AI-powered tools in healthcare.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-researched examination of the ethical challenges associated with the deployment of foundational models in medical imaging. The researchers have done an excellent job of identifying the key ethical concerns, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and accountability, and have proposed a thoughtful framework to address these issues.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on the ethical considerations and does not delve deeply into the technical aspects of implementing FMs in real-world medical settings. Further research may be needed to explore the practical challenges and operational considerations of deploying these models in clinical workflows.

Additionally, the paper could have engaged more with the broader societal implications of FMs in healthcare, such as their potential impact on healthcare equity, access, and the patient-provider relationship. Exploring these wider implications could help to provide a more holistic understanding of the ethical landscape.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the ethical deployment of foundational models in medical imaging. By highlighting the key ethical concerns and proposing a comprehensive framework for responsible development and implementation, the researchers have laid the groundwork for the responsible and trustworthy use of these powerful AI tools in healthcare.

As the field of AI-powered medical imaging continues to evolve, it will be crucial for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers to work together to address the ethical challenges and ensure that the benefits of these technologies are realized while prioritizing patient welfare and public trust.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🐍

Total Score

0

Ethical Framework for Responsible Foundational Models in Medical Imaging

Abhijit Das, Debesh Jha, Jasmer Sanjotra, Onkar Susladkar, Suramyaa Sarkar, Ashish Rauniyar, Nikhil Tomar, Vanshali Sharma, Ulas Bagci

Foundational models (FMs) have tremendous potential to revolutionize medical imaging. However, their deployment in real-world clinical settings demands extensive ethical considerations. This paper aims to highlight the ethical concerns related to FMs and propose a framework to guide their responsible development and implementation within medicine. We meticulously examine ethical issues such as privacy of patient data, bias mitigation, algorithmic transparency, explainability and accountability. The proposed framework is designed to prioritize patient welfare, mitigate potential risks, and foster trust in AI-assisted healthcare.

Read more

6/19/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Building an Ethical and Trustworthy Biomedical AI Ecosystem for the Translational and Clinical Integration of Foundational Models

Simha Sankar Baradwaj, Destiny Gilliland, Jack Rincon, Henning Hermjakob, Yu Yan, Irsyad Adam, Gwyneth Lemaster, Dean Wang, Karol Watson, Alex Bui, Wei Wang, Peipei Ping

Foundational Models (FMs) are gaining increasing attention in the biomedical AI ecosystem due to their ability to represent and contextualize multimodal biomedical data. These capabilities make FMs a valuable tool for a variety of tasks, including biomedical reasoning, hypothesis generation, and interpreting complex imaging data. In this review paper, we address the unique challenges associated with establishing an ethical and trustworthy biomedical AI ecosystem, with a particular focus on the development of FMs and their downstream applications. We explore strategies that can be implemented throughout the biomedical AI pipeline to effectively tackle these challenges, ensuring that these FMs are translated responsibly into clinical and translational settings. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of key stewardship and co-design principles that not only ensure robust regulation but also guarantee that the interests of all stakeholders, especially those involved in or affected by these clinical and translational applications are adequately represented. We aim to empower the biomedical AI community to harness these models responsibly and effectively. As we navigate this exciting frontier, our collective commitment to ethical stewardship, co-design, and responsible translation will be instrumental in ensuring that the evolution of FMs truly enhances patient care and medical decision making, ultimately leading to a more equitable and trustworthy biomedical AI ecosystem.

Read more

8/15/2024

A Survey on Trustworthiness in Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis
Total Score

0

A Survey on Trustworthiness in Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis

Congzhen Shi, Ryan Rezai, Jiaxi Yang, Qi Dou, Xiaoxiao Li

The rapid advancement of foundation models in medical imaging represents a significant leap toward enhancing diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment. However, the deployment of foundation models in healthcare necessitates a rigorous examination of their trustworthiness, encompassing privacy, robustness, reliability, explainability, and fairness. The current body of survey literature on foundation models in medical imaging reveals considerable gaps, particularly in the area of trustworthiness. Additionally, extant surveys on the trustworthiness of foundation models fail to address their specific variations and applications within the medical imaging domain. This survey paper reviews the current research on foundation models in the major medical imaging applications, with a focus on segmentation, medical report generation, medical question and answering (Q&A), and disease diagnosis, which includes trustworthiness discussion in their manuscripts. We explore the complex challenges of making foundation models for medical image analysis trustworthy, associated with each application, and summarize the current concerns and strategies to enhance trustworthiness. Furthermore, we explore the future promises of these models in revolutionizing patient care. Our analysis underscores the imperative for advancing towards trustworthy AI in medical image analysis, advocating for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while ensuring ethical and equitable healthcare delivery.

Read more

7/24/2024

A Comprehensive Survey of Foundation Models in Medicine
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Survey of Foundation Models in Medicine

Wasif Khan, Seowung Leem, Kyle B. See, Joshua K. Wong, Shaoting Zhang, Ruogu Fang

Foundation models (FMs) are large-scale deep-learning models trained on extensive datasets using self-supervised techniques. These models serve as a base for various downstream tasks, including healthcare. FMs have been adopted with great success across various domains within healthcare, including natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, graph learning, biology, and omics. Existing healthcare-based surveys have not yet included all of these domains. Therefore, this survey provides a comprehensive overview of FMs in healthcare. We focus on the history, learning strategies, flagship models, applications, and challenges of FMs. We explore how FMs such as the BERT and GPT families are reshaping various healthcare domains, including clinical large language models, medical image analysis, and omics data. Furthermore, we provide a detailed taxonomy of healthcare applications facilitated by FMs, such as clinical NLP, medical computer vision, graph learning, and other biology-related tasks. Despite the promising opportunities FMs provide, they also have several associated challenges, which are explained in detail. We also outline potential future directions to provide researchers and practitioners with insights into the potential and limitations of FMs in healthcare to advance their deployment and mitigate associated risks.

Read more

6/18/2024