A Survey on Trustworthiness in Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Provides a comprehensive survey on the trustworthiness of foundation models for medical image analysis
- Covers the background, taxonomy, technical details, critical analysis, and future directions
- Focuses on the challenges and opportunities of using foundation models in the medical domain
Plain English Explanation
This paper examines the trustworthiness of using large, pre-trained "foundation" AI models for medical image analysis tasks. Foundation models are powerful AI systems that can be adapted for a variety of applications by fine-tuning them on specific datasets.
The researchers first provide background on foundation models and the key concepts of trustworthy AI, such as robustness, fairness, and interpretability. They then discuss the unique challenges of applying these models to the medical domain, where high reliability and accountability are critical.
The paper delves into the technical details of how foundation models can be adapted and evaluated for medical image analysis tasks. It also provides a critical analysis of the current state of the research, highlighting areas that need further exploration to ensure the trustworthiness of these systems in clinical settings.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing a background on foundation models and the key principles of trustworthy AI, which are essential for the safe and responsible deployment of these models in the medical domain. The researchers then present a taxonomy that categorizes the different aspects of trustworthiness, including robustness, fairness, interpretability, and accountability.
Next, the paper explores the technical details of adapting foundation models for medical image analysis tasks. This includes discussions on fine-tuning strategies, dataset curation, and evaluation metrics that can assess the trustworthiness of the models. The researchers also highlight the unique challenges posed by the medical domain, such as the need for high reliability, the presence of sensitive patient data, and the potential for AI-related harms.
The paper then provides a critical analysis of the current state of the research, identifying areas that require further investigation. This includes the need for more comprehensive evaluation frameworks, the development of interpretable and explainable models, and the consideration of ethical and regulatory implications of using foundation models in healthcare.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the trustworthiness challenges associated with using foundation models for medical image analysis. The authors have done an excellent job of highlighting the key considerations and potential pitfalls that need to be addressed to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of these models in clinical settings.
One area that could use further exploration is the practical implementation of the proposed strategies and frameworks. While the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation, it would be valuable to see more concrete case studies or examples of how these principles have been applied in real-world medical imaging applications.
Additionally, the paper could benefit from a deeper discussion on the regulatory and policy implications of using foundation models in healthcare. As these models become more widely adopted, it will be crucial to establish clear guidelines and frameworks to ensure they are deployed in a manner that protects patient privacy, fairness, and safety.
Overall, this paper serves as an important reference for researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of foundation models and medical image analysis. By addressing the crucial issue of trustworthiness, it lays the groundwork for the development of more reliable and accountable AI systems in the healthcare domain.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey paper provides a detailed exploration of the challenges and opportunities associated with using foundation models for medical image analysis. By highlighting the key principles of trustworthy AI and delving into the technical details of adapting these models for the medical domain, the authors have laid the groundwork for future research and development in this critical area.
As foundation models continue to advance and gain popularity in healthcare applications, it will be essential to address the concerns raised in this paper, such as robustness, fairness, interpretability, and accountability. By doing so, the research community can help ensure that these powerful AI systems are deployed in a way that protects patient well-being and earns the trust of both medical professionals and the general public.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Survey on Trustworthiness in Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis
Congzhen Shi, Ryan Rezai, Jiaxi Yang, Qi Dou, Xiaoxiao Li
The rapid advancement of foundation models in medical imaging represents a significant leap toward enhancing diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment. However, the deployment of foundation models in healthcare necessitates a rigorous examination of their trustworthiness, encompassing privacy, robustness, reliability, explainability, and fairness. The current body of survey literature on foundation models in medical imaging reveals considerable gaps, particularly in the area of trustworthiness. Additionally, extant surveys on the trustworthiness of foundation models fail to address their specific variations and applications within the medical imaging domain. This survey paper reviews the current research on foundation models in the major medical imaging applications, with a focus on segmentation, medical report generation, medical question and answering (Q&A), and disease diagnosis, which includes trustworthiness discussion in their manuscripts. We explore the complex challenges of making foundation models for medical image analysis trustworthy, associated with each application, and summarize the current concerns and strategies to enhance trustworthiness. Furthermore, we explore the future promises of these models in revolutionizing patient care. Our analysis underscores the imperative for advancing towards trustworthy AI in medical image analysis, advocating for a balanced approach that fosters innovation while ensuring ethical and equitable healthcare delivery.
Read more7/24/2024
🤖
0
Developing trustworthy AI applications with foundation models
Michael Mock (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Sebastian Schmidt (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Felix Muller (University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Rebekka Gorge (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Anna Schmitz (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Elena Haedecke (University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Angelika Voss (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Dirk Hecker (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany), Maximillian Poretschkin (Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS Sankt Augustin, Germany, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany)
The trustworthiness of AI applications has been the subject of recent research and is also addressed in the EU's recently adopted AI Regulation. The currently emerging foundation models in the field of text, speech and image processing offer completely new possibilities for developing AI applications. This whitepaper shows how the trustworthiness of an AI application developed with foundation models can be evaluated and ensured. For this purpose, the application-specific, risk-based approach for testing and ensuring the trustworthiness of AI applications, as developed in the 'AI Assessment Catalog - Guideline for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence' by Fraunhofer IAIS, is transferred to the context of foundation models. Special consideration is given to the fact that specific risks of foundation models can have an impact on the AI application and must also be taken into account when checking trustworthiness. Chapter 1 of the white paper explains the fundamental relationship between foundation models and AI applications based on them in terms of trustworthiness. Chapter 2 provides an introduction to the technical construction of foundation models and Chapter 3 shows how AI applications can be developed based on them. Chapter 4 provides an overview of the resulting risks regarding trustworthiness. Chapter 5 shows which requirements for AI applications and foundation models are to be expected according to the draft of the European Union's AI Regulation and Chapter 6 finally shows the system and procedure for meeting trustworthiness requirements.
Read more5/9/2024
🐍
0
Ethical Framework for Responsible Foundational Models in Medical Imaging
Abhijit Das, Debesh Jha, Jasmer Sanjotra, Onkar Susladkar, Suramyaa Sarkar, Ashish Rauniyar, Nikhil Tomar, Vanshali Sharma, Ulas Bagci
Foundational models (FMs) have tremendous potential to revolutionize medical imaging. However, their deployment in real-world clinical settings demands extensive ethical considerations. This paper aims to highlight the ethical concerns related to FMs and propose a framework to guide their responsible development and implementation within medicine. We meticulously examine ethical issues such as privacy of patient data, bias mitigation, algorithmic transparency, explainability and accountability. The proposed framework is designed to prioritize patient welfare, mitigate potential risks, and foster trust in AI-assisted healthcare.
Read more6/19/2024
0
An Empirical Study on the Fairness of Foundation Models for Multi-Organ Image Segmentation
Qin Li, Yizhe Zhang, Yan Li, Jun Lyu, Meng Liu, Longyu Sun, Mengting Sun, Qirong Li, Wenyue Mao, Xinran Wu, Yajing Zhang, Yinghua Chu, Shuo Wang, Chengyan Wang
The segmentation foundation model, e.g., Segment Anything Model (SAM), has attracted increasing interest in the medical image community. Early pioneering studies primarily concentrated on assessing and improving SAM's performance from the perspectives of overall accuracy and efficiency, yet little attention was given to the fairness considerations. This oversight raises questions about the potential for performance biases that could mirror those found in task-specific deep learning models like nnU-Net. In this paper, we explored the fairness dilemma concerning large segmentation foundation models. We prospectively curate a benchmark dataset of 3D MRI and CT scans of the organs including liver, kidney, spleen, lung and aorta from a total of 1056 healthy subjects with expert segmentations. Crucially, we document demographic details such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) for each subject to facilitate a nuanced fairness analysis. We test state-of-the-art foundation models for medical image segmentation, including the original SAM, medical SAM and SAT models, to evaluate segmentation efficacy across different demographic groups and identify disparities. Our comprehensive analysis, which accounts for various confounding factors, reveals significant fairness concerns within these foundational models. Moreover, our findings highlight not only disparities in overall segmentation metrics, such as the Dice Similarity Coefficient but also significant variations in the spatial distribution of segmentation errors, offering empirical evidence of the nuanced challenges in ensuring fairness in medical image segmentation.
Read more6/19/2024