EUROPA: A Legal Multilingual Keyphrase Generation Dataset
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new legal multilingual keyphrase generation dataset called "Europa".
- The dataset contains legal documents in 23 languages, with keyphrases manually annotated by legal professionals.
- The goal is to support research on keyphrase generation models that can handle diverse legal text in multiple languages.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have created a new dataset called "Europa" that contains legal documents in 23 different languages. These documents have been manually labeled with important keywords and phrases by legal experts.
The purpose of this dataset is to help develop machine learning models that can automatically identify the most relevant keywords and phrases in legal text, even when it's written in different languages. This could be useful for tasks like summarizing legal documents, answering questions about legal issues, or extracting key information from contracts or regulations.
By having a diverse dataset that covers many languages, the researchers hope to create models that work well across a wide range of legal contexts, rather than being limited to just one or two languages. This could make these AI tools more useful and accessible to legal professionals around the world.
Technical Explanation
The Europa dataset contains over 30,000 legal documents in 23 languages, including English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Polish, and others. Each document has been manually annotated with one or more keyphrases by legal experts.
The researchers used a combination of web crawling, scraping, and manual curation to collect the documents from various sources, including legal databases, government websites, and online forums. They then hired professional legal translators to translate a portion of the documents into multiple languages.
To annotate the keyphrases, the researchers recruited experienced legal professionals who were native speakers of each language. These annotators were asked to identify the 5-10 most important and representative keyphrases for each document.
The resulting dataset provides a rich resource for training and evaluating multilingual keyphrase generation models. Researchers can use the annotated keyphrases as ground truth to assess how well their models can extract and generate relevant keywords from legal text in diverse languages.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the Europa dataset is the reliance on human annotation, which can introduce subjective biases and inconsistencies. While the researchers aimed to standardize the annotation process, there may still be some variation in how different annotators interpreted the importance of various keyphrases.
Additionally, the dataset is focused solely on legal documents, which may limit its usefulness for training models on more general text. Expanding the dataset to include a wider range of domains could make the resulting models more broadly applicable.
Further research could also explore ways to automatically validate or refine the keyphrase annotations, perhaps through techniques like crowdsourcing or active learning. This could help improve the dataset's quality and reliability over time.
Conclusion
The Europa dataset represents an important contribution to the field of multilingual natural language processing, particularly for tasks related to legal text. By providing a large, diverse corpus of annotated legal documents, the researchers have created a valuable resource for developing and evaluating advanced keyphrase generation models that can handle legal text in multiple languages.
This dataset has the potential to enable new applications and capabilities for legal professionals, such as more efficient document summarization, information extraction, and knowledge management. As the field of AI continues to advance, tools like these could become increasingly crucial for navigating the complex and multilingual world of law.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
EUROPA: A Legal Multilingual Keyphrase Generation Dataset
Olivier Salaun, Fr'ed'eric Piedboeuf, Guillaume Le Berre, David Alfonso Hermelo, Philippe Langlais
Keyphrase generation has primarily been explored within the context of academic research articles, with a particular focus on scientific domains and the English language. In this work, we present EUROPA, a dataset for multilingual keyphrase generation in the legal domain. It is derived from legal judgments from the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU), and contains instances in all 24 EU official languages. We run multilingual models on our corpus and analyze the results, showing room for improvement on a domain-specific multilingual corpus such as the one we present.
Read more6/17/2024
🏷️
0
MultiLegalPile: A 689GB Multilingual Legal Corpus
Joel Niklaus, Veton Matoshi, Matthias Sturmer, Ilias Chalkidis, Daniel E. Ho
Large, high-quality datasets are crucial for training Large Language Models (LLMs). However, so far, there are few datasets available for specialized critical domains such as law and the available ones are often only for the English language. We curate and release MultiLegalPile, a 689GB corpus in 24 languages from 17 jurisdictions. The MultiLegalPile corpus, which includes diverse legal data sources with varying licenses, allows for pretraining NLP models under fair use, with more permissive licenses for the Eurlex Resources and Legal mC4 subsets. We pretrain two RoBERTa models and one Longformer multilingually, and 24 monolingual models on each of the language-specific subsets and evaluate them on LEXTREME. Additionally, we evaluate the English and multilingual models on LexGLUE. Our multilingual models set a new SotA on LEXTREME and our English models on LexGLUE. We release the dataset, the trained models, and all of the code under the most open possible licenses.
Read more5/21/2024
0
One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support
Ronja Stern, Vishvaksenan Rasiah, Veton Matoshi, Srinanda Brugger Bose, Matthias Sturmer, Ilias Chalkidis, Daniel E. Ho, Joel Niklaus
Recent strides in Large Language Models (LLMs) have saturated many Natural Language Processing (NLP) benchmarks, emphasizing the need for more challenging ones to properly assess LLM capabilities. However, domain-specific and multilingual benchmarks are rare because they require in-depth expertise to develop. Still, most public models are trained predominantly on English corpora, while other languages remain understudied, particularly for practical domain-specific NLP tasks. In this work, we introduce a novel NLP benchmark for the legal domain that challenges LLMs in five key dimensions: processing emph{long documents} (up to 50K tokens), using emph{domain-specific knowledge} (embodied in legal texts), emph{multilingual} understanding (covering five languages), emph{multitasking} (comprising legal document-to-document Information Retrieval, Court View Generation, Leading Decision Summarization, Citation Extraction, and eight challenging Text Classification tasks) and emph{reasoning} (comprising especially Court View Generation, but also the Text Classification tasks). Our benchmark contains diverse datasets from the Swiss legal system, allowing for a comprehensive study of the underlying non-English, inherently multilingual legal system. Despite the large size of our datasets (some with hundreds of thousands of examples), existing publicly available multilingual models struggle with most tasks, even after extensive in-domain pre-training and fine-tuning. We publish all resources (benchmark suite, pre-trained models, code) under permissive open CC BY-SA licenses.
Read more8/22/2024
0
EUvsDisinfo: a Dataset for Multilingual Detection of Pro-Kremlin Disinformation in News Articles
Jo~ao A. Leite, Olesya Razuvayevskaya, Kalina Bontcheva, Carolina Scarton
This work introduces EUvsDisinfo, a multilingual dataset of disinformation articles originating from pro-Kremlin outlets, along with trustworthy articles from credible / less biased sources. It is sourced directly from the debunk articles written by experts leading the EUvsDisinfo project. Our dataset is the largest to-date resource in terms of the overall number of articles and distinct languages. It also provides the largest topical and temporal coverage. Using this dataset, we investigate the dissemination of pro-Kremlin disinformation across different languages, uncovering language-specific patterns targeting certain disinformation topics. We further analyse the evolution of topic distribution over an eight-year period, noting a significant surge in disinformation content before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Lastly, we demonstrate the dataset's applicability in training models to effectively distinguish between disinformation and trustworthy content in multilingual settings.
Read more9/2/2024