Evaluating Deep Clustering Algorithms on Non-Categorical 3D CAD Models

Read original: arXiv:2404.19134 - Published 5/1/2024 by Siyuan Xiang, Chin Tseng, Congcong Wen, Deshana Desai, Yifeng Kou, Binil Starly, Daniele Panozzo, Chen Feng

🤿

Overview

Rebuttal for a paper on a new dataset and evaluation protocol for 3D CAD model clustering algorithms
Focuses on addressing feedback from reviewers to improve the paper
Covers responses to specific reviewer comments and overall improvements to the work

Plain English Explanation

This paper presents a rebuttal for a previous publication that introduced a new dataset and evaluation protocol for testing clustering algorithms on 3D CAD models. The goal of this work is to provide a more robust and standardized way to assess the performance of 3D model clustering approaches, which have important applications in areas like 3D-based anomaly detection, exploiting structural similarities, and 3D benchmark datasets.

The rebuttal responds to feedback from several reviewers, addressing their concerns and suggestions to improve the original paper. This includes providing more details on the dataset construction, clarifying the evaluation protocol, and strengthening the overall presentation and conclusions. The goal is to demonstrate how the authors have incorporated the reviewer feedback to enhance the quality and impact of the Cluster3D dataset and protocol.

Technical Explanation

The Cluster3D dataset and evaluation protocol were introduced in a previous publication to address shortcomings in existing 3D model clustering benchmarks, which tend to focus on categorical data or lack diversity in the underlying 3D shapes. The rebuttal paper aims to respond to reviewer comments and incorporate their suggestions to improve the dataset and evaluation framework.

Key elements addressed in the rebuttal include:

Providing more details on the Cluster3D dataset construction, including the sources of the 3D models and the process for selecting and preprocessing the data
Clarifying the evaluation protocol, including the specific performance metrics used and how they capture different aspects of clustering quality
Strengthening the analysis of the results, including additional experiments and comparisons to state-of-the-art 3D clustering methods
Addressing concerns about the representativeness of the dataset and the potential biases in the 3D models included

The rebuttal also acknowledges areas for further improvement, such as expanding the dataset to cover a wider range of 3D shape categories and exploring alternative evaluation metrics that better capture the needs of specific 3D modeling applications.

Critical Analysis

The rebuttal paper effectively addresses the key concerns raised by the reviewers and demonstrates the authors' commitment to improving the quality and impact of the Cluster3D dataset and evaluation protocol. The additional details on dataset construction and the clarification of the evaluation methodology help strengthen the technical rigor of the work.

However, the rebuttal could have delved deeper into some of the limitations and potential biases in the Cluster3D dataset. For example, the authors could have discussed how the selection of 3D models from online repositories may introduce biases towards certain design styles or object categories, and how this could impact the generalizability of the results.

Additionally, the rebuttal could have engaged more critically with the choices made in the evaluation protocol, such as the selection of performance metrics and the rationale for prioritizing certain aspects of clustering quality over others. This could help readers better understand the tradeoffs and considerations involved in designing a comprehensive 3D model clustering evaluation framework.

Conclusion

The rebuttal paper for the Cluster3D dataset and evaluation protocol effectively addresses the feedback from the reviewers and outlines the key improvements made to the original work. By providing more details on the dataset construction, clarifying the evaluation methodology, and strengthening the overall presentation, the authors demonstrate their commitment to creating a robust and standardized benchmark for 3D model clustering algorithms.

The Cluster3D dataset and protocol have the potential to significantly advance the field of 3D shape analysis, with applications in areas such as 3D-based anomaly detection, exploiting structural similarities, and 3D benchmark datasets. The rebuttal's focus on addressing reviewer feedback and continuously improving the work is a positive step towards ensuring the dataset and protocol are widely adopted and have a lasting impact on the 3D modeling research community.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Evaluating Deep Clustering Algorithms on Non-Categorical 3D CAD Models

Siyuan Xiang, Chin Tseng, Congcong Wen, Deshana Desai, Yifeng Kou, Binil Starly, Daniele Panozzo, Chen Feng

We introduce the first work on benchmarking and evaluating deep clustering algorithms on large-scale non-categorical 3D CAD models. We first propose a workflow to allow expert mechanical engineers to efficiently annotate 252,648 carefully sampled pairwise CAD model similarities, from a subset of the ABC dataset with 22,968 shapes. Using seven baseline deep clustering methods, we then investigate the fundamental challenges of evaluating clustering methods for non-categorical data. Based on these challenges, we propose a novel and viable ensemble-based clustering comparison approach. This work is the first to directly target the underexplored area of deep clustering algorithms for 3D shapes, and we believe it will be an important building block to analyze and utilize the massive 3D shape collections that are starting to appear in deep geometric computing.

5/1/2024

🤿

A comprehensive overview of deep learning techniques for 3D point cloud classification and semantic segmentation

Sushmita Sarker, Prithul Sarker, Gunner Stone, Ryan Gorman, Alireza Tavakkoli, George Bebis, Javad Sattarvand

Point cloud analysis has a wide range of applications in many areas such as computer vision, robotic manipulation, and autonomous driving. While deep learning has achieved remarkable success on image-based tasks, there are many unique challenges faced by deep neural networks in processing massive, unordered, irregular and noisy 3D points. To stimulate future research, this paper analyzes recent progress in deep learning methods employed for point cloud processing and presents challenges and potential directions to advance this field. It serves as a comprehensive review on two major tasks in 3D point cloud processing-- namely, 3D shape classification and semantic segmentation.

5/21/2024

New!Continual Learning in 3D Point Clouds: Employing Spectral Techniques for Exemplar Selection

Hossein Resani, Behrooz Nasihatkon, Mohammadreza Alimoradi Jazi

We introduce a novel framework for Continual Learning in 3D object classification (CL3D). Our approach is based on the selection of prototypes from each class using spectral clustering. For non-Euclidean data such as point clouds, spectral clustering can be employed as long as one can define a distance measure between pairs of samples. Choosing the appropriate distance measure enables us to leverage 3D geometric characteristics to identify representative prototypes for each class. We explore the effectiveness of clustering in the input space (3D points), local feature space (1024-dimensional points), and global feature space. We conduct experiments on the ModelNet40, ShapeNet, and ScanNet datasets, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy exclusively through the use of input space features. By leveraging the combined input, local, and global features, we have improved the state-of-the-art on ModelNet and ShapeNet, utilizing nearly half the memory used by competing approaches. For the challenging ScanNet dataset, our method enhances accuracy by 4.1% while consuming just 28% of the memory used by our competitors, demonstrating the scalability of our approach.

9/16/2024

3D-CSAD: Untrained 3D Anomaly Detection for Complex Manufacturing Surfaces

Xuanming Cao, Chengyu Tao, Juan Du

The surface quality inspection of manufacturing parts based on 3D point cloud data has attracted increasing attention in recent years. The reason is that the 3D point cloud can capture the entire surface of manufacturing parts, unlike the previous practices that focus on some key product characteristics. However, achieving accurate 3D anomaly detection is challenging, due to the complex surfaces of manufacturing parts and the difficulty of collecting sufficient anomaly samples. To address these challenges, we propose a novel untrained anomaly detection method based on 3D point cloud data for complex manufacturing parts, which can achieve accurate anomaly detection in a single sample without training data. In the proposed framework, we transform an input sample into two sets of profiles along different directions. Based on one set of the profiles, a novel segmentation module is devised to segment the complex surface into multiple basic and simple components. In each component, another set of profiles, which have the nature of similar shapes, can be modeled as a low-rank matrix. Thus, accurate 3D anomaly detection can be achieved by using Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA) on these low-rank matrices. Extensive numerical experiments on different types of parts show that our method achieves promising results compared with the benchmark methods.

4/12/2024