Evaluating the efficacy of haptic feedback, 360{deg} treadmill-integrated Virtual Reality framework and longitudinal training on decision-making performance in a complex search-and-shoot simulation

Overview

• This study explores the impact of a haptic feedback, 360-degree locomotion-integrated virtual reality (VR) framework and longitudinal, heterogeneous training on decision-making performance in a complex search-and-shoot simulation.
• The researchers conducted an experiment with 32 participants from a defense simulation base in India, divided into an experimental group (using the VR framework with extra sensory modalities) and a placebo control group (using VR training without the extra modalities).
• The experiment lasted 10 days, with the participants performing a search-and-shoot simulation on the first and last days, and undergoing heterogeneous training in between.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to see if adding more ways for people to experience virtual reality (VR) could improve their decision-making skills in a complex simulation. They set up an experiment where some people used a VR system with haptic feedback (touch sensations) and 360-degree locomotion (being able to move around freely), while others used a standard VR system without those extra features.

Over 10 days, the participants practiced a search-and-shoot simulation that was designed to be similar to real-world situations. The researchers measured things like how immersed and engaged the participants felt in the VR environment. On the first and last days, the participants performed the same search-and-shoot task, and the researchers compared their decision-making performance between the two groups.

The results showed that the group using the more advanced VR system felt more present, immersed, and engaged in the virtual environment. However, there was no significant difference in their decision-making performance compared to the group using the standard VR system.

The researchers plan to use these findings to design even more engaging and effective VR training frameworks that can improve people's decision-making skills in complex, real-world scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted an experiment to evaluate the impact of a haptic feedback, 360-degree locomotion-integrated VR framework and longitudinal, heterogeneous training on decision-making performance in a complex search-and-shoot simulation. They recruited 32 participants from a defense simulation base in India and randomly divided them into two groups: an experimental group that used the VR framework with extra sensory modalities, and a placebo control group that used VR training without the extra modalities.

The experiment lasted 10 days. On Day 1, all participants executed a search-and-shoot simulation closely replicating elements and situations from the real world. From Day 2 to Day 9, the participants underwent heterogeneous training, with the simulation's complexity levels and enemy behavior/artificial intelligence changing to create a diverse learning experience. On Day 10, they repeated the initial search-and-shoot simulation.

The results showed that the experimental group experienced a gradual increase in presence, immersion, and engagement compared to the placebo control group. However, there was no significant difference in decision-making performance between the two groups on Day 10.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the potential of multisensory VR training to enhance user engagement and presence. However, the lack of a significant difference in decision-making performance between the two groups is an interesting finding that warrants further investigation.

One possible limitation of the study is the relatively short duration of the experiment, as 10 days may not have been sufficient to fully capture the long-term effects of the multisensory VR training on decision-making skills. Additionally, the study focused on a specific search-and-shoot simulation, which may not be representative of all types of decision-making tasks.

Future research could explore the impact of multisensory VR training on a wider range of decision-making scenarios, as well as investigate the optimal duration and training regimen for enhancing decision-making performance. Incorporating physiological measurements and longitudinal studies could also provide deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms and long-term effects of multisensory VR training on cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Conclusion

This study highlights the potential of multisensory VR training to improve user engagement and presence, but it did not find a significant difference in decision-making performance between the experimental and control groups. The findings suggest that the design and implementation of VR training frameworks require careful consideration to effectively enhance decision-making skills in complex, real-world scenarios. The researchers plan to use these insights to develop more advanced VR training systems that can better support improved decision-making performance.