BalanceVR: Balance Training to Increase Tolerance to Cybersickness in Immersive Virtual Reality

Overview

• Cybersickness is a significant usability problem in virtual reality (VR)
• Postural (or balance) instability theory is one of the main hypotheses for the cause of cybersickness
• This paper conducted a two-week experiment to observe trends in user balance learning and sickness tolerance under different conditions
• The results showed that balance training had a stronger effect on increasing tolerance to cybersickness than just exposure to VR
• Training in immersive VR was more effective than using non-immersive 2D media, especially for transfer to other VR content

Plain English Explanation

When people use virtual reality (VR), some of them experience cybersickness, which is like motion sickness but caused by the virtual environment. One theory is that this sickness is linked to problems with balance and stability.

To better understand this, the researchers in this paper did an experiment over two weeks. They had people practice balancing in different ways - some just used regular VR, while others did special balance training. The researchers wanted to see how this affected both the people's balance skills and their tolerance for cybersickness.

The results showed that the balance training was more effective than just using VR for increasing someone's ability to handle cybersickness. The training also improved their actual balance skills. Importantly, the training worked better when it was done in fully immersive VR, compared to just using a regular 2D screen. This means the immersive VR was better at preparing people to feel comfortable in other VR environments as well.

Overall, this research suggests that incorporating balance training into VR experiences could be a good way to reduce cybersickness and make the technology more usable for a wider range of people. The immersive nature of the training also seems to be an important factor.

Technical Explanation

This paper investigated the relationship between balance learning and cybersickness tolerance in virtual reality (VR). The researchers conducted a two-week experiment to observe trends in user balance performance and sickness tolerance under different conditions.

The experiment involved three groups: one that received balance training in immersive VR, one that received balance training using a 2D non-immersive medium, and a control group that just had exposure to VR without any targeted training. Balance performance was measured through postural stability tests, while cybersickness tolerance was assessed through self-reported symptoms.

The results showed that, in addition to improving balance skills, the balance training had a stronger effect on increasing cybersickness tolerance compared to just VR exposure alone. Furthermore, the immersive VR training was more effective than the 2D training, especially for the transfer of balance abilities to non-training VR content.

These findings support the postural (or balance) instability theory as a key factor underlying cybersickness. The paper suggests that incorporating targeted balance training, particularly in highly immersive VR environments, could be a promising approach to mitigate cybersickness and improve the overall usability of VR systems. This has important implications for the design and deployment of effective VR-based interventions, haptic feedback systems, and collaborative experiences.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the role of balance training in addressing cybersickness, a significant usability challenge in VR. However, the study has a few limitations that could be addressed in future research.

Firstly, the experiment only lasted two weeks, which may not be long enough to fully capture the long-term effects of balance training on sickness tolerance. Longer-term studies could help understand if the observed benefits persist over time or require ongoing training.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific mechanisms by which balance training reduces cybersickness. More research is needed to understand the underlying physiological and cognitive processes involved. This could lead to more targeted and effective training approaches.

Finally, the study focuses on balance training, but other factors, such as gameplay duration and individual differences, may also play a role in cybersickness. Incorporating these variables could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of cybersickness and offers a promising direction for mitigating this problem in VR. However, further research is needed to build upon these findings and develop more robust solutions.

Conclusion

This paper investigated the relationship between balance learning and cybersickness tolerance in virtual reality (VR). The results demonstrate that balance training, particularly in immersive VR environments, can effectively increase users' tolerance to cybersickness. This supports the postural instability theory as a key factor underlying this issue.

The findings have important implications for the design and deployment of VR systems, suggesting that incorporating targeted balance training could be a valuable approach to improving the overall usability and accessibility of VR technology. As VR continues to evolve and become more prevalent, addressing cybersickness will be crucial to ensuring a positive user experience and wider adoption of the technology.