Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrieval
0
❗
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recent advances in large language models have enabled the development of viable generative retrieval systems.
- These systems directly return a generated text as an answer to an information need, instead of a traditional document ranking.
- Evaluating the utility of these textual responses is essential for assessing such generative ad hoc retrieval.
- The established evaluation methodology for ranking-based retrieval is not well-suited for the reliable, repeatable, and reproducible evaluation of generated answers.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models, which are advanced AI systems that can generate human-like text, have enabled the creation of a new type of search system. Instead of just finding and ranking relevant documents, these generative retrieval systems can directly generate a tailored response to a user's query or question.
This is a significant departure from traditional search engines, which simply provide a list of potentially relevant documents. With generative retrieval, the system tries to understand the user's information need and generate a concise, relevant answer.
However, evaluating the quality and usefulness of these generated responses is challenging. The standard methods used to evaluate traditional ranking-based search systems don't work well for this new type of system. We need new ways to reliably and consistently measure the performance of generative retrieval systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper surveys the relevant research from information retrieval and natural language processing to identify the key characteristics of generative retrieval systems and develop a corresponding user model for evaluation.
The authors recognize that the established evaluation methodology for ranking-based retrieval systems, which focuses on measures like precision and recall, is not well-suited for evaluating the generated textual responses from these new systems. They propose a framework for assessing the utility of the generated answers in a reliable, repeatable, and reproducible way.
The paper provides a foundation and new insights for the evaluation of generative retrieval systems, focusing specifically on ad hoc retrieval tasks, where the user is seeking information to answer a specific question or fulfill an information need.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough overview of the challenges in evaluating generative retrieval systems and outlines a promising framework for addressing these challenges. However, the authors acknowledge that further research is needed to fully operationalize and validate their proposed user model and evaluation methodology.
One potential limitation is that the framework may not easily extend to more open-ended or exploratory search tasks, where the user's information need is less clearly defined. Additionally, the authors do not delve into the ethical considerations of these systems, such as the potential for generating biased or misleading information.
Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of widespread adoption of generative retrieval systems and to ensure that they are developed and deployed in a responsible manner that prioritizes accuracy, transparency, and user trust.
Conclusion
This paper lays the groundwork for the evaluation of a new class of search systems that leverage large language models to directly generate answers to user queries, rather than just ranking relevant documents. The authors identify the limitations of existing evaluation methodologies and propose a framework for assessing the utility of the generated responses in a reliable and reproducible way.
This research is an important step in enabling the responsible development and deployment of generative retrieval systems, which have the potential to significantly improve the user experience and accessibility of information retrieval. As these systems become more prevalent, ongoing research and thoughtful evaluation will be crucial to ensure they are designed and used in a manner that benefits society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
❗
0
Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information Retrieval
Lukas Gienapp, Harrisen Scells, Niklas Deckers, Janek Bevendorff, Shuai Wang, Johannes Kiesel, Shahbaz Syed, Maik Frobe, Guido Zuccon, Benno Stein, Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast
Recent advances in large language models have enabled the development of viable generative retrieval systems. Instead of a traditional document ranking, generative retrieval systems often directly return a grounded generated text as a response to a query. Quantifying the utility of the textual responses is essential for appropriately evaluating such generative ad hoc retrieval. Yet, the established evaluation methodology for ranking-based ad hoc retrieval is not suited for the reliable and reproducible evaluation of generated responses. To lay a foundation for developing new evaluation methods for generative retrieval systems, we survey the relevant literature from the fields of information retrieval and natural language processing, identify search tasks and system architectures in generative retrieval, develop a new user model, and study its operationalization.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Generative Information Retrieval Evaluation
Marwah Alaofi, Negar Arabzadeh, Charles L. A. Clarke, Mark Sanderson
This paper is a draft of a chapter intended to appear in a forthcoming book on generative information retrieval, co-edited by Chirag Shah and Ryen White. In this chapter, we consider generative information retrieval evaluation from two distinct but interrelated perspectives. First, large language models (LLMs) themselves are rapidly becoming tools for evaluation, with current research indicating that LLMs may be superior to crowdsource workers and other paid assessors on basic relevance judgement tasks. We review past and ongoing related research, including speculation on the future of shared task initiatives, such as TREC, and a discussion on the continuing need for human assessments. Second, we consider the evaluation of emerging LLM-based generative information retrieval (GenIR) systems, including retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems. We consider approaches that focus both on the end-to-end evaluation of GenIR systems and on the evaluation of a retrieval component as an element in a RAG system. Going forward, we expect the evaluation of GenIR systems to be at least partially based on LLM-based assessment, creating an apparent circularity, with a system seemingly evaluating its own output. We resolve this apparent circularity in two ways: 1) by viewing LLM-based assessment as a form of slow search, where a slower IR system is used for evaluation and training of a faster production IR system; and 2) by recognizing a continuing need to ground evaluation in human assessment, even if the characteristics of that human assessment must change.
Read more4/17/2024
0
A Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Generative IR
Negar Arabzadeh, Charles L. A. Clarke
Information retrieval systems increasingly incorporate generative components. For example, in a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) system, a retrieval component might provide a source of ground truth, while a generative component summarizes and augments its responses. In other systems, a large language model (LLM) might directly generate responses without consulting a retrieval component. While there are multiple definitions of generative information retrieval (Gen-IR) systems, in this paper we focus on those systems where the system's response is not drawn from a fixed collection of documents or passages. The response to a query may be entirely new text. Since traditional IR evaluation methods break down under this model, we explore various methods that extend traditional offline evaluation approaches to the Gen-IR context. Offline IR evaluation traditionally employs paid human assessors, but increasingly LLMs are replacing human assessment, demonstrating capabilities similar or superior to crowdsourced labels. Given that Gen-IR systems do not generate responses from a fixed set, we assume that methods for Gen-IR evaluation must largely depend on LLM-generated labels. Along with methods based on binary and graded relevance, we explore methods based on explicit subtopics, pairwise preferences, and embeddings. We first validate these methods against human assessments on several TREC Deep Learning Track tasks; we then apply these methods to evaluate the output of several purely generative systems. For each method we consider both its ability to act autonomously, without the need for human labels or other input, and its ability to support human auditing. To trust these methods, we must be assured that their results align with human assessments. In order to do so, evaluation criteria must be transparent, so that outcomes can be audited by human assessors.
Read more4/11/2024
🗣️
0
From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Yujia Zhou, Yuyao Zhang, Peitian Zhang, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou
Information Retrieval (IR) systems are crucial tools for users to access information, widely applied in scenarios like search engines, question answering, and recommendation systems. Traditional IR methods, based on similarity matching to return ranked lists of documents, have been reliable means of information acquisition, dominating the IR field for years. With the advancement of pre-trained language models, generative information retrieval (GenIR) has emerged as a novel paradigm, gaining increasing attention in recent years. Currently, research in GenIR can be categorized into two aspects: generative document retrieval (GR) and reliable response generation. GR leverages the generative model's parameters for memorizing documents, enabling retrieval by directly generating relevant document identifiers without explicit indexing. Reliable response generation, on the other hand, employs language models to directly generate the information users seek, breaking the limitations of traditional IR in terms of document granularity and relevance matching, offering more flexibility, efficiency, and creativity, thus better meeting practical needs. This paper aims to systematically review the latest research progress in GenIR. We will summarize the advancements in GR regarding model training, document identifier, incremental learning, downstream tasks adaptation, multi-modal GR and generative recommendation, as well as progress in reliable response generation in aspects of internal knowledge memorization, external knowledge augmentation, generating response with citations and personal information assistant. We also review the evaluation, challenges and future prospects in GenIR systems. This review aims to offer a comprehensive reference for researchers in the GenIR field, encouraging further development in this area.
Read more5/17/2024