From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
0
🗣️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Information Retrieval (IR) systems are crucial tools for users to access information, used in search engines, question answering, and recommendation systems.
- Traditional IR methods based on similarity matching have been reliable, but with the rise of pre-trained language models, a new paradigm called Generative Information Retrieval (GenIR) has emerged.
- GenIR research can be categorized into two aspects: generative document retrieval (GR) and reliable response generation.
Plain English Explanation
Information retrieval (IR) systems are software tools that help people find the information they're looking for. They're used in all kinds of common applications, like search engines, question-answering systems, and recommendation systems.
The traditional way these IR systems work is by finding documents that are similar to what the user is searching for and showing them in a ranked list. This has been a reliable approach for many years. But with the development of advanced language models, a new type of IR system called "generative information retrieval" (GenIR) has been gaining attention.
GenIR systems work in two main ways. First, they can directly generate the relevant document IDs, instead of just finding similar documents. This is called "generative document retrieval." Second, they can generate the actual information the user is looking for, instead of just returning documents. This is called "reliable response generation." These GenIR approaches offer more flexibility, efficiency, and creativity in meeting users' needs.
Technical Explanation
Traditional IR methods have relied on similarity matching to return ranked lists of documents, which has been a reliable way of information acquisition. However, with the advancement of pre-trained language models, a new paradigm called Generative Information Retrieval (GenIR) has emerged.
GenIR research can be categorized into two main aspects:
-
Generative Document Retrieval (GR): GR leverages the generative model's parameters to memorize documents, enabling retrieval by directly generating relevant document identifiers without explicit indexing.
-
Reliable Response Generation: This approach employs language models to directly generate the information users seek, breaking the limitations of traditional IR in terms of document granularity and relevance matching. This offers more flexibility, efficiency, and creativity in meeting practical needs.
The paper aims to systematically review the latest research progress in these two areas of GenIR. For GR, the advancements covered include model training, document identifier generation, incremental learning, downstream task adaptation, multi-modal GR, and generative recommendation. For reliable response generation, the progress is discussed in terms of internal knowledge memorization, external knowledge augmentation, generating responses with citations, and personal information assistant applications.
The paper also reviews the evaluation methods, challenges, and future prospects in GenIR systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research in Generative Information Retrieval (GenIR), covering both generative document retrieval and reliable response generation. It highlights the potential advantages of GenIR over traditional IR methods, such as increased flexibility, efficiency, and creativity in meeting user needs.
However, the paper also acknowledges some of the challenges and limitations of GenIR. For example, the evaluation of GenIR systems can be complex, as it requires considering factors beyond just relevance, such as the quality and coherence of the generated responses. Additionally, the integration of external knowledge into GenIR systems remains an area for further research and development.
It would be interesting to see more discussion on the potential ethical implications of GenIR, particularly around the risk of generating false or misleading information, and how to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of these systems. Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific technical challenges and trade-offs involved in the different approaches to GenIR, such as the term-set generation approach or the use of personal information in question-answering applications.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable overview of the current state of GenIR research and highlights the exciting potential of this new paradigm in information retrieval. It will be interesting to see how the field continues to evolve and address the remaining challenges in the coming years.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the latest research in Generative Information Retrieval (GenIR), a novel paradigm that has emerged with the advancement of pre-trained language models. The two main aspects of GenIR research – generative document retrieval and reliable response generation – offer significant improvements over traditional IR methods in terms of flexibility, efficiency, and creativity in meeting user needs.
The paper summarizes the advancements in both areas, covering aspects like model training, document identifier generation, incremental learning, multi-modal capabilities, and the integration of external knowledge. It also highlights the challenges and future prospects of GenIR systems, particularly around evaluation and ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of the generated responses.
Overall, this review provides a valuable reference for researchers working in the GenIR field, encouraging further development and innovation in this exciting area of information retrieval.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🗣️
0
From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Yujia Zhou, Yuyao Zhang, Peitian Zhang, Yutao Zhu, Zhicheng Dou
Information Retrieval (IR) systems are crucial tools for users to access information, widely applied in scenarios like search engines, question answering, and recommendation systems. Traditional IR methods, based on similarity matching to return ranked lists of documents, have been reliable means of information acquisition, dominating the IR field for years. With the advancement of pre-trained language models, generative information retrieval (GenIR) has emerged as a novel paradigm, gaining increasing attention in recent years. Currently, research in GenIR can be categorized into two aspects: generative document retrieval (GR) and reliable response generation. GR leverages the generative model's parameters for memorizing documents, enabling retrieval by directly generating relevant document identifiers without explicit indexing. Reliable response generation, on the other hand, employs language models to directly generate the information users seek, breaking the limitations of traditional IR in terms of document granularity and relevance matching, offering more flexibility, efficiency, and creativity, thus better meeting practical needs. This paper aims to systematically review the latest research progress in GenIR. We will summarize the advancements in GR regarding model training, document identifier, incremental learning, downstream tasks adaptation, multi-modal GR and generative recommendation, as well as progress in reliable response generation in aspects of internal knowledge memorization, external knowledge augmentation, generating response with citations and personal information assistant. We also review the evaluation, challenges and future prospects in GenIR systems. This review aims to offer a comprehensive reference for researchers in the GenIR field, encouraging further development in this area.
Read more5/17/2024
0
A Survey of Generative Information Retrieval
Tzu-Lin Kuo, Tzu-Wei Chiu, Tzung-Sheng Lin, Sheng-Yang Wu, Chao-Wei Huang, Yun-Nung Chen
Generative Retrieval (GR) is an emerging paradigm in information retrieval that leverages generative models to directly map queries to relevant document identifiers (DocIDs) without the need for traditional query processing or document reranking. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of GR, highlighting key developments, indexing and retrieval strategies, and challenges. We discuss various document identifier strategies, including numerical and string-based identifiers, and explore different document representation methods. Our primary contribution lies in outlining future research directions that could profoundly impact the field: improving the quality of query generation, exploring learnable document identifiers, enhancing scalability, and integrating GR with multi-task learning frameworks. By examining state-of-the-art GR techniques and their applications, this survey aims to provide a foundational understanding of GR and inspire further innovations in this transformative approach to information retrieval. We also make the complementary materials such as paper collection publicly available at https://github.com/MiuLab/GenIR-Survey/
Read more6/5/2024
0
A Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Generative IR
Negar Arabzadeh, Charles L. A. Clarke
Information retrieval systems increasingly incorporate generative components. For example, in a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) system, a retrieval component might provide a source of ground truth, while a generative component summarizes and augments its responses. In other systems, a large language model (LLM) might directly generate responses without consulting a retrieval component. While there are multiple definitions of generative information retrieval (Gen-IR) systems, in this paper we focus on those systems where the system's response is not drawn from a fixed collection of documents or passages. The response to a query may be entirely new text. Since traditional IR evaluation methods break down under this model, we explore various methods that extend traditional offline evaluation approaches to the Gen-IR context. Offline IR evaluation traditionally employs paid human assessors, but increasingly LLMs are replacing human assessment, demonstrating capabilities similar or superior to crowdsourced labels. Given that Gen-IR systems do not generate responses from a fixed set, we assume that methods for Gen-IR evaluation must largely depend on LLM-generated labels. Along with methods based on binary and graded relevance, we explore methods based on explicit subtopics, pairwise preferences, and embeddings. We first validate these methods against human assessments on several TREC Deep Learning Track tasks; we then apply these methods to evaluate the output of several purely generative systems. For each method we consider both its ability to act autonomously, without the need for human labels or other input, and its ability to support human auditing. To trust these methods, we must be assured that their results align with human assessments. In order to do so, evaluation criteria must be transparent, so that outcomes can be audited by human assessors.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Generative Information Retrieval Evaluation
Marwah Alaofi, Negar Arabzadeh, Charles L. A. Clarke, Mark Sanderson
This paper is a draft of a chapter intended to appear in a forthcoming book on generative information retrieval, co-edited by Chirag Shah and Ryen White. In this chapter, we consider generative information retrieval evaluation from two distinct but interrelated perspectives. First, large language models (LLMs) themselves are rapidly becoming tools for evaluation, with current research indicating that LLMs may be superior to crowdsource workers and other paid assessors on basic relevance judgement tasks. We review past and ongoing related research, including speculation on the future of shared task initiatives, such as TREC, and a discussion on the continuing need for human assessments. Second, we consider the evaluation of emerging LLM-based generative information retrieval (GenIR) systems, including retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems. We consider approaches that focus both on the end-to-end evaluation of GenIR systems and on the evaluation of a retrieval component as an element in a RAG system. Going forward, we expect the evaluation of GenIR systems to be at least partially based on LLM-based assessment, creating an apparent circularity, with a system seemingly evaluating its own output. We resolve this apparent circularity in two ways: 1) by viewing LLM-based assessment as a form of slow search, where a slower IR system is used for evaluation and training of a faster production IR system; and 2) by recognizing a continuing need to ground evaluation in human assessment, even if the characteristics of that human assessment must change.
Read more4/17/2024