Evaluation and Continual Improvement for an Enterprise AI Assistant
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the evaluation and continual improvement of an enterprise AI assistant
- Highlights limitations of existing approaches and proposes a new framework
- Emphasizes the importance of responsible development and evaluation of advanced AI assistants
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper discusses the evaluation and ongoing improvement of an enterprise-level AI assistant. It recognizes that existing approaches have limitations, such as difficulty in measuring the full impact of the AI system and challenges in maintaining performance over time.
To address these issues, the paper proposes a new framework that focuses on responsible development of generative AI systems and continual learning for dialogue systems. The goal is to ensure the AI assistant remains effective, transparent, and aligned with user needs as it is deployed and updated within an organization.
The framework emphasizes the importance of evaluating the scientific landscape of conversational AI and developing a conceptual framework for generative AI chatbots in educational contexts. By taking a holistic approach to the design, deployment, and ongoing improvement of the AI assistant, the researchers aim to promote ethical and responsible development of advanced AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for the evaluation and continual improvement of an enterprise AI assistant. It identifies several limitations of existing approaches, including:
- Difficulty in measuring the full impact of the AI system on user productivity, satisfaction, and organizational outcomes.
- Challenges in maintaining the performance of the AI assistant over time as user needs and organizational contexts evolve.
To address these issues, the proposed framework emphasizes the following key elements:
- Responsible Development: The framework advocates for a responsible approach to the development of the AI assistant, ensuring alignment with organizational values, ethical principles, and user needs.
- Holistic Evaluation: The evaluation process considers a wide range of metrics, including task completion rates, user satisfaction, and organizational impact, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the AI assistant's performance.
- Continual Learning: The framework incorporates mechanisms for the AI assistant to continuously learn and adapt to changing user preferences, organizational needs, and emerging use cases, ensuring its ongoing effectiveness and relevance.
The authors highlight the importance of evaluating the scientific landscape of conversational AI and developing a conceptual framework for generative AI chatbots in educational contexts to inform the design and implementation of the enterprise AI assistant. They also emphasize the need for lifelong continual learning and ethical considerations to ensure the long-term success and responsible deployment of the system.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive framework for the evaluation and continual improvement of an enterprise AI assistant, addressing important limitations in existing approaches. However, the authors acknowledge that the framework may face challenges in practical implementation, such as the difficulty in quantifying the full organizational impact of the AI system and the complexity of maintaining continual learning capabilities.
Additionally, while the paper emphasizes the importance of responsible development and ethical considerations, it does not provide detailed guidelines or case studies on how to navigate potential ethical dilemmas that may arise during the deployment and ongoing improvement of the AI assistant. Further research and industry collaboration may be needed to develop more concrete strategies for addressing ethical concerns.
Finally, the proposed framework may require significant resources and expertise to implement, which could pose barriers for smaller organizations or those with limited technical capabilities. The authors could have discussed potential strategies for scaling the framework or providing guidance for organizations with varying levels of AI maturity.
Conclusion
The paper presents a thoughtful and comprehensive framework for the evaluation and continual improvement of an enterprise AI assistant. By addressing the limitations of existing approaches and emphasizing responsible development, holistic evaluation, and continual learning, the framework aims to ensure the long-term effectiveness, transparency, and alignment of the AI assistant with organizational and user needs.
While the proposed framework faces some practical challenges, it represents an important step towards the responsible and ethical deployment of advanced AI systems in enterprise settings. The insights and principles outlined in the paper can serve as a valuable reference for organizations seeking to harness the power of AI while prioritizing user trust, organizational impact, and ethical considerations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluation and Continual Improvement for an Enterprise AI Assistant
Akash V. Maharaj, Kun Qian, Uttaran Bhattacharya, Sally Fang, Horia Galatanu, Manas Garg, Rachel Hanessian, Nishant Kapoor, Ken Russell, Shivakumar Vaithyanathan, Yunyao Li
The development of conversational AI assistants is an iterative process with multiple components. As such, the evaluation and continual improvement of these assistants is a complex and multifaceted problem. This paper introduces the challenges in evaluating and improving a generative AI assistant for enterprises, which is under active development, and how we address these challenges. We also share preliminary results and discuss lessons learned.
Read more7/18/2024
🤖
0
Towards Responsible Development of Generative AI for Education: An Evaluation-Driven Approach
Irina Jurenka, Markus Kunesch, Kevin R. McKee, Daniel Gillick, Shaojian Zhu, Sara Wiltberger, Shubham Milind Phal, Katherine Hermann, Daniel Kasenberg, Avishkar Bhoopchand, Ankit Anand, Miruna P^islar, Stephanie Chan, Lisa Wang, Jennifer She, Parsa Mahmoudieh, Aliya Rysbek, Wei-Jen Ko, Andrea Huber, Brett Wiltshire, Gal Elidan, Roni Rabin, Jasmin Rubinovitz, Amit Pitaru, Mac McAllister, Julia Wilkowski, David Choi, Roee Engelberg, Lidan Hackmon, Adva Levin, Rachel Griffin, Michael Sears, Filip Bar, Mia Mesar, Mana Jabbour, Arslan Chaudhry, James Cohan, Sridhar Thiagarajan, Nir Levine, Ben Brown, Dilan Gorur, Svetlana Grant, Rachel Hashimshoni, Laura Weidinger, Jieru Hu, Dawn Chen, Kuba Dolecki, Canfer Akbulut, Maxwell Bileschi, Laura Culp, Wen-Xin Dong, Nahema Marchal, Kelsie Van Deman, Hema Bajaj Misra, Michael Duah, Moran Ambar, Avi Caciularu, Sandra Lefdal, Chris Summerfield, James An, Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Abhinit Mohdi, Theofilos Strinopoulous, Annie Hale, Wayne Anderson, Luis C. Cobo, Niv Efron, Muktha Ananda, Shakir Mohamed, Maureen Heymans, Zoubin Ghahramani, Yossi Matias, Ben Gomes, Lila Ibrahim
A major challenge facing the world is the provision of equitable and universal access to quality education. Recent advances in generative AI (gen AI) have created excitement about the potential of new technologies to offer a personal tutor for every learner and a teaching assistant for every teacher. The full extent of this dream, however, has not yet materialised. We argue that this is primarily due to the difficulties with verbalising pedagogical intuitions into gen AI prompts and the lack of good evaluation practices, reinforced by the challenges in defining excellent pedagogy. Here we present our work collaborating with learners and educators to translate high level principles from learning science into a pragmatic set of seven diverse educational benchmarks, spanning quantitative, qualitative, automatic and human evaluations; and to develop a new set of fine-tuning datasets to improve the pedagogical capabilities of Gemini, introducing LearnLM-Tutor. Our evaluations show that LearnLM-Tutor is consistently preferred over a prompt tuned Gemini by educators and learners on a number of pedagogical dimensions. We hope that this work can serve as a first step towards developing a comprehensive educational evaluation framework, and that this can enable rapid progress within the AI and EdTech communities towards maximising the positive impact of gen AI in education.
Read more7/22/2024
0
A Novel Mathematical Framework for Objective Evaluation of Ideas using a Conversational AI (CAI) System
B. Sankar, Dibakar Sen
The demand for innovation in product design necessitates a prolific ideation phase. Conversational AI (CAI) systems that use Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) have been shown to be fruitful in augmenting human creativity, providing numerous novel and diverse ideas. Despite the success in ideation quantity, the qualitative assessment of these ideas remains challenging and traditionally reliant on expert human evaluation. This method suffers from limitations such as human judgment errors, bias, and oversight. Addressing this gap, our study introduces a comprehensive mathematical framework for automated analysis to objectively evaluate the plethora of ideas generated by CAI systems and/or humans. This framework is particularly advantageous for novice designers who lack experience in selecting promising ideas. By converting the ideas into higher dimensional vectors and quantitatively measuring the diversity between them using tools such as UMAP, DBSCAN and PCA, the proposed method provides a reliable and objective way of selecting the most promising ideas, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the ideation phase.
Read more9/14/2024
🤖
0
Developing generative AI chatbots conceptual framework for higher education
Joshua Ebere Chukwuere
This research explores the quickly changing field of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) chatbots in higher education, an industry that is undergoing major technological changes. AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, HuggingChat, and Google Bard, are becoming more and more common in a variety of sectors, including education. Their acceptance is still in its early phases, with a variety of prospects and obstacles. However, their potential in higher education is particularly noteworthy, providing lecturers and students with affordable, individualized support. Creating a comprehensive framework to aid the usage of generative AI chatbots in higher education institutions (HEIs) is the aim of this project. The Generative AI Chatbots Acceptance Model (GAICAM) is the result of this study's synthesis of elements from well-known frameworks, including the TAM, UTAUT2, TPB, and others along with variables like optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, insecurity, and others. Using a research method that encompasses a comprehensive analysis of extant literature from databases such as IEEE, ACM, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, the study aims to comprehend the implications of AI Chatbots on higher education and pinpoint critical elements for their efficacious implementation. Peer-reviewed English-language publications published between 2020 and 2023 with a focus on the use of AI chatbots in higher education were the main focus of the search criteria. The results demonstrate how much AI chatbots can do to improve student engagement, streamline the educational process, and support administrative and research duties. But there are also clear difficulties, such as unfavorable student sentiments, doubts about the veracity of material produced by AI, and unease and nervousness with new technologies.
Read more5/14/2024