On the Evaluation of Procedural Level Generation Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the evaluation of procedural level generation systems in video games.
- It reviews existing research on evaluating these types of generative systems.
- The paper aims to identify best practices and highlight areas for further research in this field.
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how researchers and developers can assess the quality and effectiveness of video game level generation systems. These are algorithms that can automatically create new game levels or environments, rather than having them designed manually.
The researchers reviewed previous studies that have attempted to evaluate these types of generative systems. They wanted to understand the approaches and metrics that have been used, and identify any gaps or areas that need more work.
The goal is to help the field of procedural level generation develop better methods for determining how good the automatically created content is. This is important because these generative algorithms are becoming more widely used in games, but it's not always clear how to judge their performance. The paper provides guidance on best practices and highlights opportunities for future research in this area.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of procedural level generation and its growing use in video game development. It then reviews existing research on evaluation methods for these types of generative systems, including both quantitative and qualitative approaches.
The researchers analyze the different metrics and criteria that have been used, such as measures of novelty, diversity, playability, and user experience. They also discuss the challenges involved in defining appropriate evaluation frameworks, given the subjective and contextual nature of level design.
The paper then examines recent developments in the broader field of generative AI, and considers how ideas from areas like generative information retrieval and synthetic data generation might be applied to the evaluation of procedural level generation.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the inherent difficulty in evaluating procedural level generation systems, given the subjective and contextual nature of game design. It highlights the need for more standardized evaluation frameworks and metrics that can capture the multifaceted aspects of generated content.
The researchers also note that much of the existing research has focused on specific game genres or contexts, and call for more cross-domain studies to understand the broader applicability of evaluation approaches.
Additionally, the paper suggests that further work is needed to understand the relationship between automated generation and human-authored content, as well as the impact of these systems on the player experience.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art in evaluating procedural level generation systems for video games. It identifies best practices, key challenges, and opportunities for future research in this field.
The insights from this work can help guide both researchers and developers as they seek to create more effective and player-centric generative algorithms for game content. By advancing the evaluation methodologies, the field can continue to improve the quality and impact of procedural level generation in the video game industry.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On the Evaluation of Procedural Level Generation Systems
Oliver Withington, Michael Cook, Laurissa Tokarchuk
The evaluation of procedural content generation (PCG) systems for generating video game levels is a complex and contested topic. Ideally, the field would have access to robust, generalisable and widely accepted evaluation approaches that can be used to compare novel PCG systems to prior work, but consensus on how to evaluate novel systems is currently limited. We argue that the field can benefit from a structured analysis of how procedural level generation systems can be evaluated, and how these techniques are currently used by researchers. This analysis can then be used to both inform on the current state of affairs, and to provide data to justify changes to this practice. This work aims to provide this by first developing a novel taxonomy of PCG evaluation approaches, and then presenting the results of a survey of recent work in the field through the lens of this taxonomy. The results of this survey highlight several important weaknesses in current practice which we argue could be substantially mitigated by 1) promoting use of evaluation free system descriptions where appropriate, 2) promoting the development of diverse research frameworks, 3) promoting reuse of code and methodology wherever possible.
Read more4/30/2024
0
It might be balanced, but is it actually good? An Empirical Evaluation of Game Level Balancing
Florian Rupp, Alessandro Puddu, Christian Becker-Asano, Kai Eckert
Achieving optimal balance in games is essential to their success, yet reliant on extensive manual work and playtesting. To facilitate this process, the Procedural Content Generation via Reinforcement Learning (PCGRL) framework has recently been effectively used to improve the balance of existing game levels. This approach, however, only assesses balance heuristically, neglecting actual human perception. For this reason, this work presents a survey to empirically evaluate the created content paired with human playtesting. Participants in four different scenarios are asked about their perception of changes made to the level both before and after balancing, and vice versa. Based on descriptive and statistical analysis, our findings indicate that the PCGRL-based balancing positively influences players' perceived balance for most scenarios, albeit with differences in aspects of the balancing between scenarios.
Read more7/17/2024
🛸
0
Procedural Content Generation via Generative Artificial Intelligence
Xinyu Mao, Wanli Yu, Kazunori D Yamada, Michael R. Zielewski
The attempt to utilize machine learning in PCG has been made in the past. In this survey paper, we investigate how generative artificial intelligence (AI), which saw a significant increase in interest in the mid-2010s, is being used for PCG. We review applications of generative AI for the creation of various types of content, including terrains, items, and even storylines. While generative AI is effective for PCG, one significant issues it faces is that building high-performance generative AI requires vast amounts of training data. Because content generally highly customized, domain-specific training data is scarce, and straightforward approaches to generative AI models may not work well. For PCG research to advance further, issues related to limited training data must be overcome. Thus, we also give special consideration to research that addresses the challenges posed by limited training data.
Read more7/15/2024
0
PCGRL+: Scaling, Control and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Level Generators
Sam Earle, Zehua Jiang, Julian Togelius
Procedural Content Generation via Reinforcement Learning (PCGRL) has been introduced as a means by which controllable designer agents can be trained based only on a set of computable metrics acting as a proxy for the level's quality and key characteristics. While PCGRL offers a unique set of affordances for game designers, it is constrained by the compute-intensive process of training RL agents, and has so far been limited to generating relatively small levels. To address this issue of scale, we implement several PCGRL environments in Jax so that all aspects of learning and simulation happen in parallel on the GPU, resulting in faster environment simulation; removing the CPU-GPU transfer of information bottleneck during RL training; and ultimately resulting in significantly improved training speed. We replicate several key results from prior works in this new framework, letting models train for much longer than previously studied, and evaluating their behavior after 1 billion timesteps. Aiming for greater control for human designers, we introduce randomized level sizes and frozen pinpoints of pivotal game tiles as further ways of countering overfitting. To test the generalization ability of learned generators, we evaluate models on large, out-of-distribution map sizes, and find that partial observation sizes learn more robust design strategies.
Read more8/23/2024