On the Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models for Spoken Language Understanding
2406.10083
0
0
Abstract
The Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation (SLUE) suite of benchmark tasks was recently introduced to address the need for open resources and benchmarking of complex spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks, including both classification and sequence generation tasks, on natural speech. The benchmark has demonstrated preliminary success in using pre-trained speech foundation models (SFM) for these SLU tasks. However, the community still lacks a fine-grained understanding of the comparative utility of different SFMs. Inspired by this, we ask: which SFMs offer the most benefits for these complex SLU tasks, and what is the most effective approach for incorporating these SFMs? To answer this, we perform an extensive evaluation of multiple supervised and self-supervised SFMs using several evaluation protocols: (i) frozen SFMs with a lightweight prediction head, (ii) frozen SFMs with a complex prediction head, and (iii) fine-tuned SFMs with a lightweight prediction head. Although the supervised SFMs are pre-trained on much more speech recognition data (with labels), they do not always outperform self-supervised SFMs; the latter tend to perform at least as well as, and sometimes better than, supervised SFMs, especially on the sequence generation tasks in SLUE. While there is no universally optimal way of incorporating SFMs, the complex prediction head gives the best performance for most tasks, although it increases the inference time. We also introduce an open-source toolkit and performance leaderboard, SLUE-PERB, for these tasks and modeling strategies.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the performance of speech foundation models on spoken language understanding tasks.
- Speech foundation models are large neural networks trained on massive amounts of speech data to perform a variety of speech-related tasks.
- The authors assess how well these speech foundation models perform on downstream tasks like speech recognition, intent classification, and dialogue state tracking.
- The results provide insights into the capabilities and limitations of current speech foundation models, which can inform future model development and deployment.
Plain English Explanation
Speech foundation models are like very smart digital assistants that can understand and process spoken language. These models are trained on huge datasets of speech, allowing them to learn patterns and features that help them perform a wide range of speech-related tasks.
In this paper, the researchers evaluate how well these speech foundation models perform on different spoken language understanding challenges. This includes things like transcribing speech accurately, classifying the intent behind spoken phrases, and tracking the state of a dialogue. By testing the models on these kinds of tasks, the researchers can get a sense of the models' strengths and weaknesses.
The findings from this study help us understand the current capabilities of speech foundation models and where there is room for improvement. This knowledge can inform the development of even more powerful and versatile speech AI systems in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper "On the Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models for Spoken Language Understanding" presents a comprehensive evaluation of several state-of-the-art speech foundation models on a range of spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks.
The authors assess the performance of models like Whisper, UniSLU, and DiscreteSLU on benchmarks covering speech recognition, intent classification, dialogue state tracking, and other SLU capabilities. They also analyze how model size, pretraining data, and other factors impact the models' performance.
The results show that larger speech foundation models generally achieve better performance, but there are also tradeoffs in terms of inference latency and memory usage. The authors further find that models pretrained on more diverse speech data tend to generalize better to a wider range of SLU tasks. Additionally, the paper introduces a new benchmark, SVSNet, for evaluating speaker voice similarity.
Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the current state-of-the-art in speech foundation models and identifies areas for future research and development to advance the field of spoken language understanding.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of speech foundation models, which is crucial for understanding the capabilities and limitations of these powerful AI systems. The authors' use of diverse SLU benchmarks and careful analysis of model performance under different conditions is commendable.
However, the paper does not address some potential concerns with speech foundation models, such as their susceptibility to biases present in the training data or their ability to handle accented or non-standard speech. Additionally, the authors do not discuss the ethical implications of deploying these models in real-world applications, such as privacy concerns or the potential for misuse.
Further research is needed to address these issues and ensure that speech foundation models are developed and deployed responsibly. The authors could also explore the application of these models in domains beyond SLU, such as speech-based interfaces for assistive technologies or multimodal AI systems that combine speech with other modalities.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive evaluation of speech foundation models and their performance on a range of spoken language understanding tasks. The findings provide valuable insights into the current state of the art in this rapidly evolving field, highlighting the strengths and limitations of these powerful AI systems.
The results can inform the development of more advanced and versatile speech AI models, which have the potential to enhance a wide variety of applications, from virtual assistants to language learning tools. As the researchers note, continued progress in this area will require addressing key challenges, such as improving model generalization and exploring the ethical implications of deploying these technologies.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the ongoing effort to push the boundaries of speech AI and unlock new possibilities for human-machine interaction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Large-Scale Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models
Shu-wen Yang, Heng-Jui Chang, Zili Huang, Andy T. Liu, Cheng-I Lai, Haibin Wu, Jiatong Shi, Xuankai Chang, Hsiang-Sheng Tsai, Wen-Chin Huang, Tzu-hsun Feng, Po-Han Chi, Yist Y. Lin, Yung-Sung Chuang, Tzu-Hsien Huang, Wei-Cheng Tseng, Kushal Lakhotia, Shang-Wen Li, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Shinji Watanabe, Hung-yi Lee
0
0
The foundation model paradigm leverages a shared foundation model to achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance for various tasks, requiring minimal downstream-specific modeling and data annotation. This approach has proven crucial in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, the speech processing community lacks a similar setup to explore the paradigm systematically. In this work, we establish the Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark (SUPERB) to study the effectiveness of the paradigm for speech. We propose a unified multi-tasking framework to address speech processing tasks in SUPERB using a frozen foundation model followed by task-specialized, lightweight prediction heads. Combining our results with community submissions, we verify that the foundation model paradigm is promising for speech, and our multi-tasking framework is simple yet effective, as the best-performing foundation model shows competitive generalizability across most SUPERB tasks. For reproducibility and extensibility, we have developed a long-term maintained platform that enables deterministic benchmarking, allows for result sharing via an online leaderboard, and promotes collaboration through a community-driven benchmark database to support new development cycles. Finally, we conduct a series of analyses to offer an in-depth understanding of SUPERB and speech foundation models, including information flows across tasks inside the models, the correctness of the weighted-sum benchmarking protocol and the statistical significance and robustness of the benchmark.
5/31/2024
Benchmarking Children's ASR with Supervised and Self-supervised Speech Foundation Models
Ruchao Fan, Natarajan Balaji Shankar, Abeer Alwan
0
0
Speech foundation models (SFMs) have achieved state-of-the-art results for various speech tasks in supervised (e.g. Whisper) or self-supervised systems (e.g. WavLM). However, the performance of SFMs for child ASR has not been systematically studied. In addition, there is no benchmark for child ASR with standard evaluations, making the comparisons of novel ideas difficult. In this paper, we initiate and present a comprehensive benchmark on several child speech databases based on various SFMs (Whisper, Wav2vec2.0, HuBERT, and WavLM). Moreover, we investigate finetuning strategies by comparing various data augmentation and parameter-efficient finetuning (PEFT) methods. We observe that the behaviors of these methods are different when the model size increases. For example, PEFT matches the performance of full finetuning for large models but worse for small models. To stabilize finetuning using augmented data, we propose a perturbation invariant finetuning (PIF) loss as a regularization.
6/18/2024
🗣️
Speech Translation with Speech Foundation Models and Large Language Models: What is There and What is Missing?
Marco Gaido, Sara Papi, Matteo Negri, Luisa Bentivogli
0
0
The field of natural language processing (NLP) has recently witnessed a transformative shift with the emergence of foundation models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) that have revolutionized text-based NLP. This paradigm has extended to other modalities, including speech, where researchers are actively exploring the combination of Speech Foundation Models (SFMs) and LLMs into single, unified models capable of addressing multimodal tasks. Among such tasks, this paper focuses on speech-to-text translation (ST). By examining the published papers on the topic, we propose a unified view of the architectural solutions and training strategies presented so far, highlighting similarities and differences among them. Based on this examination, we not only organize the lessons learned but also show how diverse settings and evaluation approaches hinder the identification of the best-performing solution for each architectural building block and training choice. Lastly, we outline recommendations for future works on the topic aimed at better understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the SFM+LLM solutions for ST.
5/20/2024
💬
UniverSLU: Universal Spoken Language Understanding for Diverse Tasks with Natural Language Instructions
Siddhant Arora, Hayato Futami, Jee-weon Jung, Yifan Peng, Roshan Sharma, Yosuke Kashiwagi, Emiru Tsunoo, Karen Livescu, Shinji Watanabe
0
0
Recent studies leverage large language models with multi-tasking capabilities, using natural language prompts to guide the model's behavior and surpassing performance of task-specific models. Motivated by this, we ask: can we build a single model that jointly performs various spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks? We start by adapting a pre-trained automatic speech recognition model to additional tasks using single-token task specifiers. We enhance this approach through instruction tuning, i.e., finetuning by describing the task using natural language instructions followed by the list of label options. Our approach can generalize to new task descriptions for the seen tasks during inference, thereby enhancing its user-friendliness. We demonstrate the efficacy of our single multi-task learning model UniverSLU for 12 speech classification and sequence generation task types spanning 17 datasets and 9 languages. On most tasks, UniverSLU achieves competitive performance and often even surpasses task-specific models. Additionally, we assess the zero-shot capabilities, finding that the model generalizes to new datasets and languages for seen task types.
4/4/2024