A Large-Scale Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models
2404.09385
0
0
Abstract
The foundation model paradigm leverages a shared foundation model to achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance for various tasks, requiring minimal downstream-specific modeling and data annotation. This approach has proven crucial in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). However, the speech processing community lacks a similar setup to explore the paradigm systematically. In this work, we establish the Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark (SUPERB) to study the effectiveness of the paradigm for speech. We propose a unified multi-tasking framework to address speech processing tasks in SUPERB using a frozen foundation model followed by task-specialized, lightweight prediction heads. Combining our results with community submissions, we verify that the foundation model paradigm is promising for speech, and our multi-tasking framework is simple yet effective, as the best-performing foundation model shows competitive generalizability across most SUPERB tasks. For reproducibility and extensibility, we have developed a long-term maintained platform that enables deterministic benchmarking, allows for result sharing via an online leaderboard, and promotes collaboration through a community-driven benchmark database to support new development cycles. Finally, we conduct a series of analyses to offer an in-depth understanding of SUPERB and speech foundation models, including information flows across tasks inside the models, the correctness of the weighted-sum benchmarking protocol and the statistical significance and robustness of the benchmark.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a large-scale evaluation of speech foundation models, which are pre-trained models that can be fine-tuned for various speech-related tasks.
- The authors assess the performance of several state-of-the-art speech foundation models across a diverse set of tasks, including speech recognition, speaker identification, emotion recognition, and more.
- The goal is to provide a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the capabilities and limitations of these models, which can inform future research and development in the field of speech AI.
Plain English Explanation
Speech foundation models are AI systems that have been trained on large amounts of speech data, allowing them to understand and process speech in a general way. Much like how large language models like GPT-3 have become powerful tools for natural language processing, speech foundation models have the potential to serve as versatile building blocks for various speech-related applications.
In this paper, the researchers set out to thoroughly evaluate the performance of several prominent speech foundation models across a wide range of tasks. They wanted to see how well these models could handle things like speech recognition, speaker identification, emotion detection, and more. By putting the models through their paces on this diverse set of benchmarks, the researchers aimed to better understand the current capabilities and limitations of speech foundation models, which could help guide future advancements in the field.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by surveying the related work in the area of speech foundation models and their applications. The authors then describe the experimental setup, which involved evaluating several state-of-the-art speech foundation models, including HuBERT, XLSR-Wav2Vec2, and WavLM, on a comprehensive set of 18 speech-related tasks.
The tasks were divided into four categories: speech recognition, speaker-related tasks (e.g., speaker identification, diarization), emotion recognition, and other miscellaneous tasks. The models were evaluated on a diverse set of datasets, including both high-resource and low-resource scenarios, to assess their generalization capabilities.
The results show that the speech foundation models generally outperform previous state-of-the-art approaches on most tasks, demonstrating their strong potential as versatile building blocks for speech-based applications. However, the models also exhibit certain limitations, such as poorer performance on low-resource tasks and difficulty in handling accented or noisy speech.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed evaluation of speech foundation models, covering a wide range of tasks and datasets. This comprehensive benchmark is a valuable resource for the research community, as it helps to identify the current capabilities and limitations of these models.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a relatively small number of speech foundation models. While the authors have included several prominent models, there are likely other relevant models that could be included in future evaluations to provide a more complete picture.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the reasons behind the performance differences between the models, which could offer important insights for further model development. Exploring the specific architectural choices, training strategies, and other factors that contribute to model performance would be a useful area for future research.
Conclusion
This large-scale evaluation of speech foundation models provides a valuable benchmark for assessing the current state of the art in this rapidly evolving field. The results demonstrate the impressive capabilities of these models in handling a diverse set of speech-related tasks, while also highlighting areas where further research and development is needed.
As the authors note, the findings from this study can inform the design of future speech foundation models and guide the development of more robust and versatile speech AI systems. By continuing to push the boundaries of speech foundation model performance, researchers and developers can unlock new possibilities for speech-based applications that can benefit a wide range of industries and user communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
On the Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models for Spoken Language Understanding
Siddhant Arora, Ankita Pasad, Chung-Ming Chien, Jionghao Han, Roshan Sharma, Jee-weon Jung, Hira Dhamyal, William Chen, Suwon Shon, Hung-yi Lee, Karen Livescu, Shinji Watanabe
0
0
The Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation (SLUE) suite of benchmark tasks was recently introduced to address the need for open resources and benchmarking of complex spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks, including both classification and sequence generation tasks, on natural speech. The benchmark has demonstrated preliminary success in using pre-trained speech foundation models (SFM) for these SLU tasks. However, the community still lacks a fine-grained understanding of the comparative utility of different SFMs. Inspired by this, we ask: which SFMs offer the most benefits for these complex SLU tasks, and what is the most effective approach for incorporating these SFMs? To answer this, we perform an extensive evaluation of multiple supervised and self-supervised SFMs using several evaluation protocols: (i) frozen SFMs with a lightweight prediction head, (ii) frozen SFMs with a complex prediction head, and (iii) fine-tuned SFMs with a lightweight prediction head. Although the supervised SFMs are pre-trained on much more speech recognition data (with labels), they do not always outperform self-supervised SFMs; the latter tend to perform at least as well as, and sometimes better than, supervised SFMs, especially on the sequence generation tasks in SLUE. While there is no universally optimal way of incorporating SFMs, the complex prediction head gives the best performance for most tasks, although it increases the inference time. We also introduce an open-source toolkit and performance leaderboard, SLUE-PERB, for these tasks and modeling strategies.
6/17/2024
🗣️
Speech Translation with Speech Foundation Models and Large Language Models: What is There and What is Missing?
Marco Gaido, Sara Papi, Matteo Negri, Luisa Bentivogli
0
0
The field of natural language processing (NLP) has recently witnessed a transformative shift with the emergence of foundation models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) that have revolutionized text-based NLP. This paradigm has extended to other modalities, including speech, where researchers are actively exploring the combination of Speech Foundation Models (SFMs) and LLMs into single, unified models capable of addressing multimodal tasks. Among such tasks, this paper focuses on speech-to-text translation (ST). By examining the published papers on the topic, we propose a unified view of the architectural solutions and training strategies presented so far, highlighting similarities and differences among them. Based on this examination, we not only organize the lessons learned but also show how diverse settings and evaluation approaches hinder the identification of the best-performing solution for each architectural building block and training choice. Lastly, we outline recommendations for future works on the topic aimed at better understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the SFM+LLM solutions for ST.
5/20/2024
Exploring Speech Foundation Models for Speaker Diarization in Child-Adult Dyadic Interactions
Anfeng Xu, Kevin Huang, Tiantian Feng, Lue Shen, Helen Tager-Flusberg, Shrikanth Narayanan
0
0
Speech foundation models, trained on vast datasets, have opened unique opportunities in addressing challenging low-resource speech understanding, such as child speech. In this work, we explore the capabilities of speech foundation models on child-adult speaker diarization. We show that exemplary foundation models can achieve 39.5% and 62.3% relative reductions in Diarization Error Rate and Speaker Confusion Rate, respectively, compared to previous speaker diarization methods. In addition, we benchmark and evaluate the speaker diarization results of the speech foundation models with varying the input audio window size, speaker demographics, and training data ratio. Our results highlight promising pathways for understanding and adopting speech foundation models to facilitate child speech understanding.
6/13/2024
Benchmarking Children's ASR with Supervised and Self-supervised Speech Foundation Models
Ruchao Fan, Natarajan Balaji Shankar, Abeer Alwan
0
0
Speech foundation models (SFMs) have achieved state-of-the-art results for various speech tasks in supervised (e.g. Whisper) or self-supervised systems (e.g. WavLM). However, the performance of SFMs for child ASR has not been systematically studied. In addition, there is no benchmark for child ASR with standard evaluations, making the comparisons of novel ideas difficult. In this paper, we initiate and present a comprehensive benchmark on several child speech databases based on various SFMs (Whisper, Wav2vec2.0, HuBERT, and WavLM). Moreover, we investigate finetuning strategies by comparing various data augmentation and parameter-efficient finetuning (PEFT) methods. We observe that the behaviors of these methods are different when the model size increases. For example, PEFT matches the performance of full finetuning for large models but worse for small models. To stabilize finetuning using augmented data, we propose a perturbation invariant finetuning (PIF) loss as a regularization.
6/18/2024