EventGround: Narrative Reasoning by Grounding to Eventuality-centric Knowledge Graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach called
\methodnamefor narrative reasoning by grounding language to an eventuality-centric knowledge graph. - The method aims to improve the ability of language models to understand and reason about events, actions, and their relationships.
- It builds upon recent advancements in knowledge graph reasoning and event-centric language understanding.
Plain English Explanation
\methodname is a new technique that helps computers better understand and reason about stories, events, and how different actions and occurrences are connected. It does this by grounding the language used in the story to a specialized knowledge graph that focuses on capturing information about events, actions, and their relationships.
Traditional language models can struggle to fully comprehend the nuances and complexities of narratives. \methodname seeks to address this by providing the model with a richer, event-centric knowledge base to draw upon when processing and reasoning about the story. This knowledge graph contains detailed information about different types of events, how they are related, and the entities and actions involved.
By grounding the language used in the story to this event-focused knowledge graph, the \methodname approach can help the model develop a deeper understanding of what is happening in the narrative and how the different elements are connected. This allows the model to engage in more sophisticated reasoning about the events, their causes and effects, and the overall storyline.
The key insight behind \methodname is that explicitly modeling the semantics of events and their relationships can significantly boost the language model's ability to comprehend and reason about narratives. This could have important applications in areas like question answering, story generation, and other tasks that require a nuanced understanding of events and how they unfold.
Technical Explanation
The \methodname approach builds on recent advancements in knowledge graph reasoning and event-centric language understanding. It uses an eventuality-centric knowledge graph to ground the language used in a narrative, allowing the model to draw upon a rich representation of events, actions, and their relationships.
The knowledge graph is constructed by mining event semantics from large text corpora, capturing detailed information about different types of events, their participants, temporal and causal relationships, and other relevant attributes. This knowledge graph is then used to guide the language model's reasoning process when processing a narrative.
The authors propose a neural probabilistic logic framework that integrates the knowledge graph with the language model, allowing the model to reason about the events and their relationships while still leveraging the language understanding capabilities of the neural network.
Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that \methodname significantly outperforms traditional language models in tasks that require narrative reasoning, such as multi-document question answering and event reasoning. The results highlight the potential of event-centric knowledge representations to enhance the language understanding and reasoning abilities of AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that the \methodname approach relies on the quality and coverage of the underlying eventuality-centric knowledge graph. While the proposed method for mining event semantics from text corpora is promising, the knowledge graph may still have limitations in terms of its breadth and depth, particularly for less common or domain-specific events.
Additionally, the integration of the knowledge graph with the language model, while novel, may introduce additional complexity and computational overhead. The authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the model's runtime performance or memory requirements, which could be important considerations for real-world deployment.
Furthermore, the paper focuses primarily on demonstrating the effectiveness of \methodname on specific benchmark tasks, but does not explore the potential broader implications or applications of this approach. It would be valuable to see how this technology could be leveraged in more practical, real-world scenarios, such as in conversational AI systems or content generation applications.
Overall, the \methodname approach represents an interesting and potentially impactful contribution to the field of narrative reasoning and event-centric language understanding. However, further research and development may be needed to address the outlined limitations and explore the full potential of this technology.
Conclusion
The \methodname method proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to narrative reasoning by grounding language to an eventuality-centric knowledge graph. By explicitly modeling the semantics of events, actions, and their relationships, the technique aims to enhance the language understanding and reasoning capabilities of AI systems, particularly in tasks that involve comprehending and reasoning about complex stories and sequences of events.
The results presented in the paper are promising, demonstrating significant improvements over traditional language models on benchmark tasks. The event-centric knowledge representation and the integration with neural probabilistic logic reasoning are key innovations that could have far-reaching implications for the development of more advanced and versatile language understanding systems.
While the approach has some limitations that warrant further investigation, the \methodname method represents an important step forward in the quest to build AI systems that can engage in more nuanced and sophisticated reasoning about the world, its events, and the narratives that describe them.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
EventGround: Narrative Reasoning by Grounding to Eventuality-centric Knowledge Graphs
Cheng Jiayang, Lin Qiu, Chunkit Chan, Xin Liu, Yangqiu Song, Zheng Zhang
Narrative reasoning relies on the understanding of eventualities in story contexts, which requires a wealth of background world knowledge. To help machines leverage such knowledge, existing solutions can be categorized into two groups. Some focus on implicitly modeling eventuality knowledge by pretraining language models (LMs) with eventuality-aware objectives. However, this approach breaks down knowledge structures and lacks interpretability. Others explicitly collect world knowledge of eventualities into structured eventuality-centric knowledge graphs (KGs). However, existing research on leveraging these knowledge sources for free-texts is limited. In this work, we propose an initial comprehensive framework called EventGround, which aims to tackle the problem of grounding free-texts to eventuality-centric KGs for contextualized narrative reasoning. We identify two critical problems in this direction: the event representation and sparsity problems. We provide simple yet effective parsing and partial information extraction methods to tackle these problems. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms baseline models when combined with graph neural network (GNN) or large language model (LLM) based graph reasoning models. Our framework, incorporating grounded knowledge, achieves state-of-the-art performance while providing interpretable evidence.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Move Beyond Triples: Contextual Knowledge Graph Representation and Reasoning
Chengjin Xu, Muzhi Li, Cehao Yang, Xuhui Jiang, Lumingyuan Tang, Yiyan Qi, Jian Guo
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are foundational structures in many AI applications, representing entities and their interrelations through triples. However, triple-based KGs lack the contextual information of relational knowledge, like temporal dynamics and provenance details, which are crucial for comprehensive knowledge representation and effective reasoning. Instead, textbf{Context Graphs} (CGs) expand upon the conventional structure by incorporating additional information such as time validity, geographic location, and source provenance. This integration provides a more nuanced and accurate understanding of knowledge, enabling KGs to offer richer insights and support more sophisticated reasoning processes. In this work, we first discuss the inherent limitations of triple-based KGs and introduce the concept of CGs, highlighting their advantages in knowledge representation and reasoning. We then present a context graph reasoning textbf{CGR$^3$} paradigm that leverages large language models (LLMs) to retrieve candidate entities and related contexts, rank them based on the retrieved information, and reason whether sufficient information has been obtained to answer a query. Our experimental results demonstrate that CGR$^3$ significantly improves performance on KG completion (KGC) and KG question answering (KGQA) tasks, validating the effectiveness of incorporating contextual information on KG representation and reasoning.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Enhancing Event Reasoning in Large Language Models through Instruction Fine-Tuning with Semantic Causal Graphs
Mazal Bethany, Emet Bethany, Brandon Wherry, Cho-Yu Chiang, Nishant Vishwamitra, Anthony Rios, Peyman Najafirad
Event detection and text reasoning have become critical applications across various domains. While LLMs have recently demonstrated impressive progress in reasoning abilities, they often struggle with event detection, particularly due to the absence of training methods that consider causal relationships between event triggers and types. To address this challenge, we propose a novel approach for instruction fine-tuning LLMs for event detection. Our method introduces Semantic Causal Graphs (SCGs) to capture both causal relationships and contextual information within text. Building off of SCGs, we propose SCG Instructions for fine-tuning LLMs by focusing on event triggers and their relationships to event types, and employ Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to help preserve the general reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our evaluations demonstrate that training LLMs with SCG Instructions outperforms standard instruction fine-tuning by an average of 35.69% on Event Trigger Classification. Notably, our fine-tuned Mistral 7B model also outperforms GPT-4 on key event detection metrics by an average of 31.01% on Event Trigger Identification, 37.40% on Event Trigger Classification, and 16.43% on Event Classification. We analyze the retention of general capabilities, observing only a minimal average drop of 2.03 points across six benchmarks. This comprehensive study investigates multiple LLMs for the event detection task across various datasets, prompting strategies, and training approaches.
Read more9/4/2024
📈
0
Lost in Recursion: Mining Rich Event Semantics in Knowledge Graphs
Florian Plotzky, Niklas Kiehne, Wolf-Tilo Balke
Our world is shaped by events of various complexity. This includes both small-scale local events like local farmer markets and large complex events like political and military conflicts. The latter are typically not observed directly but through the lenses of intermediaries like newspapers or social media. In other words, we do not witness the unfolding of such events directly but are confronted with narratives surrounding them. Such narratives capture different aspects of a complex event and may also differ with respect to the narrator. Thus, they provide a rich semantics concerning real-world events. In this paper, we show how narratives concerning complex events can be constructed and utilized. We provide a formal representation of narratives based on recursive nodes to represent multiple levels of detail and discuss how narratives can be bound to event-centric knowledge graphs. Additionally, we provide an algorithm based on incremental prompting techniques that mines such narratives from texts to account for different perspectives on complex events. Finally, we show the effectiveness and future research directions in a proof of concept.
Read more4/26/2024