An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers explore using human rights as a framework for regulating the impact of data-intensive AI systems.
- They analyze over 700 decisions and documents from data protection authorities in six countries.
- The goal is to develop a practical Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) methodology for AI applications.
- The proposed HRIA approach aims to provide a measurable risk assessment consistent with regulatory proposals.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a new way to address the challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Rather than focusing solely on personal data or ethics, the researchers suggest using human rights as a framework for regulating the impact of data-intensive AI systems.
Through an analysis of over 700 decisions and documents from data protection authorities in six countries, the researchers show that human rights already underpin many of the decisions made in the field of data use. Based on this empirical evidence, they present a methodology and model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) specifically tailored for AI applications.
The proposed HRIA approach provides a more measurable and context-specific way to assess the risks associated with data-intensive AI systems. This is consistent with regulatory proposals that focus on risk thresholds. The researchers test the feasibility and effectiveness of their HRIA methodology through concrete case studies.
The overall goal is to move the discussion around HRIA from a theoretical debate to a practical, real-world implementation in the field of data-intensive AI applications.
Technical Explanation
The researchers analyze over 700 decisions and documents from the data protection authorities of six countries to demonstrate that human rights already underpin many of the decisions made in the field of data use. Based on this empirical evidence, they present a methodology and model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA) specifically tailored for AI applications.
The proposed HRIA approach aims to provide a more measurable and context-specific risk assessment, which is consistent with regulatory proposals that focus on risk thresholds. The researchers test the feasibility and effectiveness of their HRIA methodology through concrete case studies.
The HRIA methodology and related assessment model are focused on AI applications, whose nature and scale require a proper contextualization of the HRIA approach. The proposed models aim to respond to the growing interest in HRIA, moving from a theoretical debate to a concrete and context-specific implementation in the field of data-intensive AI applications.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their proposed HRIA methodology is not a paradigm shift but rather a way to build on the existing role of human rights in regulating the impact of data-intensive systems. They also recognize that the nature and scale of AI applications require a specialized HRIA approach.
One potential limitation of the research is the specific focus on the decisions and documents from data protection authorities in six countries. While this provides a solid empirical foundation, the generalizability of the findings to other jurisdictions or regulatory bodies may be limited.
Additionally, the researchers do not delve into potential challenges or concerns that may arise during the practical implementation of the HRIA methodology. Further research may be needed to identify and address any obstacles or unintended consequences that could arise when applying this approach in real-world AI deployments.
Conclusion
This research presents a novel approach to regulating the impact of data-intensive AI systems by leveraging the framework of human rights. Through an in-depth analysis of empirical evidence from data protection authorities, the researchers develop a practical HRIA methodology that aims to provide a more measurable and context-specific risk assessment for AI applications.
The proposed HRIA approach represents a promising step towards addressing the challenges of AI regulation in a way that is grounded in human rights principles. By moving the discussion from theory to practice, this research opens the door for further development and refinement of human rights-based frameworks for governing the use of data-intensive technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems
Alessandro Mantelero, Maria Samantha Esposito
Different approaches have been adopted in addressing the challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI), some centred on personal data and others on ethics, respectively narrowing and broadening the scope of AI regulation. This contribution aims to demonstrate that a third way is possible, starting from the acknowledgement of the role that human rights can play in regulating the impact of data-intensive systems. The focus on human rights is neither a paradigm shift nor a mere theoretical exercise. Through the analysis of more than 700 decisions and documents of the data protection authorities of six countries, we show that human rights already underpin the decisions in the field of data use. Based on empirical analysis of this evidence, this work presents a methodology and a model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA). The methodology and related assessment model are focused on AI applications, whose nature and scale require a proper contextualisation of HRIA methodology. Moreover, the proposed models provide a more measurable approach to risk assessment which is consistent with the regulatory proposals centred on risk thresholds. The proposed methodology is tested in concrete case-studies to prove its feasibility and effectiveness. The overall goal is to respond to the growing interest in HRIA, moving from a mere theoretical debate to a concrete and context-specific implementation in the field of data-intensive applications based on AI.
Read more7/31/2024
0
Beyond static AI evaluations: advancing human interaction evaluations for LLM harms and risks
Lujain Ibrahim, Saffron Huang, Lama Ahmad, Markus Anderljung
Model evaluations are central to understanding the safety, risks, and societal impacts of AI systems. While most real-world AI applications involve human-AI interaction, most current evaluations (e.g., common benchmarks) of AI models do not. Instead, they incorporate human factors in limited ways, assessing the safety of models in isolation, thereby falling short of capturing the complexity of human-model interactions. In this paper, we discuss and operationalize a definition of an emerging category of evaluations -- human interaction evaluations (HIEs) -- which focus on the assessment of human-model interactions or the process and the outcomes of humans using models. First, we argue that HIEs can be used to increase the validity of safety evaluations, assess direct human impact and interaction-specific harms, and guide future assessments of models' societal impact. Second, we propose a safety-focused HIE design framework -- containing a human-LLM interaction taxonomy -- with three stages: (1) identifying the risk or harm area, (2) characterizing the use context, and (3) choosing the evaluation parameters. Third, we apply our framework to two potential evaluations for overreliance and persuasion risks. Finally, we conclude with tangible recommendations for addressing concerns over costs, replicability, and unrepresentativeness of HIEs.
Read more7/15/2024
📈
0
Human-Data Interaction Framework: A Comprehensive Model for a Future Driven by Data and Humans
Ivan Durango, Jose A. Gallud, Victor M. R. Penichet
In an age defined by rapid data expansion, the connection between individuals and their digital footprints has become more intricate. The Human-Data Interaction (HDI) framework has become an essential approach to tackling the challenges and ethical issues associated with data governance and utilization in the modern digital world. This paper outlines the fundamental steps required for organizations to seamlessly integrate HDI principles, emphasizing auditing, aligning, formulating considerations, and the need for continuous monitoring and adaptation. Through a thorough audit, organizations can critically assess their current data management practices, trace the data lifecycle from collection to disposal, and evaluate the effectiveness of existing policies, security protocols, and user interfaces. The next step involves aligning these practices with the main HDI principles, such as informed consent, data transparency, user control, algorithm transparency, and ethical data use, to identify gaps that need strategic action. Formulating preliminary considerations includes developing policies and technical solutions to close identified gaps, ensuring that these practices not only meet legal standards, but also promote fairness and accountability in data interactions. The final step, monitoring and adaptation, highlights the need for setting up continuous evaluation mechanisms and being responsive to technological, regulatory, and societal developments, ensuring HDI practices stay up-to-date and effective. Successful implementation of the HDI framework requires multi-disciplinary collaboration, incorporating insights from technology, law, ethics, and user experience design. The paper posits that this comprehensive approach is vital for building trust and legitimacy in digital environments, ultimately leading to more ethical, transparent, and user-centric data interactions.
Read more7/31/2024
0
Hacia una implementaci'on 'etica e inclusiva de la Inteligencia Artificial en las organizaciones: un marco multidimensional
Ernesto Giralt Hern'andez
The article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on contemporary society and the importance of adopting an ethical approach to its development and implementation within organizations. It examines the critical perspective of French philosopher 'Eric Sadin and others, who warn of the risks of unbridled technologization that can erode human autonomy. However, the article also recognizes the active role that various actors, such as governments, academics and civil society, can play in shaping the development of AI aligned with human and social values. A multidimensional approach is proposed that combines ethics with regulation, innovation and education. It highlights the importance of developing detailed ethical frameworks, incorporating ethics in the training of professionals, conducting ethical impact audits, and encouraging stakeholder participation in AI design. In addition, four fundamental pillars for the ethical implementation of AI in organizations are presented: 1) Integrated values, 2) Trust and transparency, 3) Empowering human growth, and 4) Identifying strategic factors. These pillars cover aspects such as alignment with the company's ethical identity, governance and accountability, human-centered design, continuous training and adaptability in the face of technological and market changes. It concludes by emphasizing that ethics must be the cornerstone of the strategy of any organization that aspires to incorporate AI, establishing a solid framework to ensure that the technology is developed and used in a way that respects and promotes human values.
Read more5/2/2024