Human-Data Interaction Framework: A Comprehensive Model for a Future Driven by Data and Humans

Read original: arXiv:2407.21010 - Published 7/31/2024 by Ivan Durango, Jose A. Gallud, Victor M. R. Penichet
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a comprehensive framework for Human-Data Interaction (HDI), which aims to facilitate a future driven by both data and humans.
  • The framework provides a structured approach to understanding and optimizing the relationship between humans and data in various domains.
  • The authors emphasize the importance of considering the human element in the design and deployment of data-driven systems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces the Human-Data Interaction (HDI) Framework, which is a model that helps us understand and improve the way humans and data work together. In today's world, data is becoming increasingly important, but it's crucial that we don't lose sight of the human aspect. The HDI Framework provides a way to ensure that data-driven systems are designed with humans in mind.

The framework breaks down the interaction between humans and data into three key components: Participation, Agency, and Empowerment. Participation refers to how humans engage with data and data-driven systems. Agency is about the level of control and decision-making power that humans have. Empowerment is about how data and data-driven systems can enhance human capabilities and well-being.

By considering these three elements, the HDI Framework helps us create data-driven systems that are more responsive to human needs and preferences. This is important because data and technology are becoming increasingly prevalent in our lives, and we need to make sure that they are serving us, rather than the other way around.

Technical Explanation

The Human-Data Interaction (HDI) Framework presented in the paper provides a comprehensive model for understanding and optimizing the relationship between humans and data in a wide range of domains. The framework identifies three key components:

  1. Participation: This refers to the ways in which humans engage with data and data-driven systems, including data collection, curation, and analysis.
  2. Agency: This involves the level of control and decision-making power that humans have over data and the systems that use it.
  3. Empowerment: This concerns how data and data-driven systems can augment and enhance human capabilities, knowledge, and well-being.

The authors argue that by considering these three elements, it is possible to design data-driven systems that are more responsive to human needs and preferences. This is particularly important as data and technology become increasingly pervasive in our lives.

The paper also outlines several key principles that should guide the development of HDI systems, such as transparency, accountability, and user control. These principles are intended to ensure that data-driven systems are aligned with human values and priorities.

Critical Analysis

The HDI Framework presented in the paper is a well-researched and thoughtful approach to addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by the growing prominence of data and data-driven systems in our lives. The authors recognize the potential risks and limitations of these systems, such as the potential for bias, privacy concerns, and the risk of disempowering or marginalizing certain groups.

However, the paper could have delved deeper into some of these potential issues and provided more concrete guidance on how to mitigate them. Additionally, the authors do not address the potential tradeoffs or tensions that may arise between the different components of the HDI Framework (e.g., between user agency and system optimization).

Despite these minor limitations, the HDI Framework is a valuable contribution to the growing field of human-centered data science and AI. By emphasizing the importance of the human element in the design and deployment of data-driven systems, the framework has the potential to help shape a future where technology serves to empower and enhance human capabilities, rather than replace or diminish them.

Conclusion

The Human-Data Interaction (HDI) Framework presented in this paper offers a comprehensive and holistic approach to understanding and optimizing the relationship between humans and data. By focusing on the key elements of Participation, Agency, and Empowerment, the framework provides a roadmap for designing data-driven systems that are aligned with human values and priorities.

As data and technology continue to play an increasingly central role in our lives, the insights and principles outlined in this paper will be crucial for ensuring that the future is one where humans and data work together in harmony to enhance our capabilities, knowledge, and overall well-being. The HDI Framework represents an important step towards realizing this vision and shaping a more human-centered, data-driven future.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Human-Data Interaction Framework: A Comprehensive Model for a Future Driven by Data and Humans

Ivan Durango, Jose A. Gallud, Victor M. R. Penichet

In an age defined by rapid data expansion, the connection between individuals and their digital footprints has become more intricate. The Human-Data Interaction (HDI) framework has become an essential approach to tackling the challenges and ethical issues associated with data governance and utilization in the modern digital world. This paper outlines the fundamental steps required for organizations to seamlessly integrate HDI principles, emphasizing auditing, aligning, formulating considerations, and the need for continuous monitoring and adaptation. Through a thorough audit, organizations can critically assess their current data management practices, trace the data lifecycle from collection to disposal, and evaluate the effectiveness of existing policies, security protocols, and user interfaces. The next step involves aligning these practices with the main HDI principles, such as informed consent, data transparency, user control, algorithm transparency, and ethical data use, to identify gaps that need strategic action. Formulating preliminary considerations includes developing policies and technical solutions to close identified gaps, ensuring that these practices not only meet legal standards, but also promote fairness and accountability in data interactions. The final step, monitoring and adaptation, highlights the need for setting up continuous evaluation mechanisms and being responsive to technological, regulatory, and societal developments, ensuring HDI practices stay up-to-date and effective. Successful implementation of the HDI framework requires multi-disciplinary collaboration, incorporating insights from technology, law, ethics, and user experience design. The paper posits that this comprehensive approach is vital for building trust and legitimacy in digital environments, ultimately leading to more ethical, transparent, and user-centric data interactions.

Read more

7/31/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

An evidence-based methodology for human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in the development of AI data-intensive systems

Alessandro Mantelero, Maria Samantha Esposito

Different approaches have been adopted in addressing the challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI), some centred on personal data and others on ethics, respectively narrowing and broadening the scope of AI regulation. This contribution aims to demonstrate that a third way is possible, starting from the acknowledgement of the role that human rights can play in regulating the impact of data-intensive systems. The focus on human rights is neither a paradigm shift nor a mere theoretical exercise. Through the analysis of more than 700 decisions and documents of the data protection authorities of six countries, we show that human rights already underpin the decisions in the field of data use. Based on empirical analysis of this evidence, this work presents a methodology and a model for a Human Rights Impact Assessment (HRIA). The methodology and related assessment model are focused on AI applications, whose nature and scale require a proper contextualisation of HRIA methodology. Moreover, the proposed models provide a more measurable approach to risk assessment which is consistent with the regulatory proposals centred on risk thresholds. The proposed methodology is tested in concrete case-studies to prove its feasibility and effectiveness. The overall goal is to respond to the growing interest in HRIA, moving from a mere theoretical debate to a concrete and context-specific implementation in the field of data-intensive applications based on AI.

Read more

7/31/2024

Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework
Total Score

0

Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework

George Fragiadakis, Christos Diou, George Kousiouris, Mara Nikolaidou

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in working environments with individuals, known as Human-AI Collaboration (HAIC), has become essential in a variety of domains, boosting decision-making, efficiency, and innovation. Despite HAIC's wide potential, evaluating its effectiveness remains challenging due to the complex interaction of components involved. This paper provides a detailed analysis of existing HAIC evaluation approaches and develops a fresh paradigm for more effectively evaluating these systems. Our framework includes a structured decision tree which assists to select relevant metrics based on distinct HAIC modes (AI-Centric, Human-Centric, and Symbiotic). By including both quantitative and qualitative metrics, the framework seeks to represent HAIC's dynamic and reciprocal nature, enabling the assessment of its impact and success. This framework's practicality can be examined by its application in an array of domains, including manufacturing, healthcare, finance, and education, each of which has unique challenges and requirements. Our hope is that this study will facilitate further research on the systematic evaluation of HAIC in real-world applications.

Read more

7/30/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Patient-centered data science: an integrative framework for evaluating and predicting clinical outcomes in the digital health era

Mohsen Amoei, Dan Poenaru

This study proposes a novel, integrative framework for patient-centered data science in the digital health era. We developed a multidimensional model that combines traditional clinical data with patient-reported outcomes, social determinants of health, and multi-omic data to create comprehensive digital patient representations. Our framework employs a multi-agent artificial intelligence approach, utilizing various machine learning techniques including large language models, to analyze complex, longitudinal datasets. The model aims to optimize multiple patient outcomes simultaneously while addressing biases and ensuring generalizability. We demonstrate how this framework can be implemented to create a learning healthcare system that continuously refines strategies for optimal patient care. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the translation of digital health innovations into real-world clinical benefits, addressing current limitations in AI-driven healthcare models.

Read more

8/7/2024